J.Peter van Tintelen

Prof. Dr. J.Peter van Tintelen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 August 2023 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Elena ArbeloElena Arbelo
Elena Arbelo
APAlexandros Protonotarios
Alexandros Protonotarios
Juan Ramón GimenoJuan Ramón Gimeno
Juan Ramón Gimeno
EAEloisa Arbustini
Eloisa Arbustini
RBRoberto Barriales-Villa
Roberto Barriales-Villa
AWAdam Witkowski
Adam Witkowski

6 July 2021 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EJElizabeth Jordan
Elizabeth Jordan
LPLaiken Peterson
Laiken Peterson
TATomohiko Ai
Tomohiko Ai
BABabken Asatryan
Babken Asatryan
LBLucas Bronicki
Lucas Bronicki
RHRay E. Hershberger
Ray E. Hershberger
Background: Each of the cardiomyopathies, classically categorized as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, has a signature genetic theme. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy are largely understood as genetic diseases of sarcomere or desmosome proteins, respectively. In contrast, >250 genes spanning >10 gene ontologies have been implicated in DCM, representing a complex and diverse genetic architecture. To clarify this, a systematic curation of evidence to establish the relationship of genes with DCM was conducted. Methods: An international panel with clinical and scientific expertise in DCM genetics evaluated evidence supporting monogenic relationships of genes with idiopathic DCM. The panel used the Clinical Genome Resource semiquantitative gene-disease clinical validity classification framework with modifications for DCM genetics to classify genes into categories on the basis of the strength of currently available evidence. Representation of DCM genes on clinically available genetic testing panels was evaluated. Results: Fifty-one genes with human genetic evidence were curated. Twelve genes (23%) from 8 gene ontologies were classified as having definitive ( BAG3 , DES , FLNC , LMNA , MYH7 , PLN , RBM20 , SCN5A , TNNC1 , TNNT2 , TTN ) or strong ( DSP ) evidence. Seven genes (14%; ACTC1 , ACTN2 , JPH2 , NEXN , TNNI3 , TPM1 , VCL ) including 2 additional ontologies were classified as moderate evidence; these genes are likely to emerge as strong or definitive with additional evidence. Of these 19 genes, 6 were similarly classified for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and 3 for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Of the remaining 32 genes (63%), 25 (49%) had limited evidence, 4 (8%) were disputed, 2 (4%) had no disease relationship, and 1 (2%) was supported by animal model data only. Of the 16 evaluated clinical genetic testing panels, most definitive genes were included, but panels also included numerous genes with minimal human evidence. Conclusions: In the curation of 51 genes, 19 had high evidence (12 definitive/strong, 7 moderate). It is notable that these 19 genes explain only a minority of cases, leaving the remainder of DCM genetic architecture incompletely addressed. Clinical genetic testing panels include most high-evidence genes; however, genes lacking robust evidence are also commonly included. We recommend that high-evidence DCM genes be used for clinical practice and that caution be exercised in the interpretation of variants in variable-evidence DCM genes.

25 January 2021 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RTRafik Tadros
Rafik Tadros
CFCatherine Francis
Catherine Francis
XXXiao Xu
Xiao Xu
AVAlexa M. C. Vermeer
Alexa M. C. Vermeer
AHAndrew R. Harper
Andrew R. Harper
CBConnie Bezzina
Connie Bezzina

1 June 2021 in Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CJCynthia A. James
Cynthia A. James
JJJan D.H. Jongbloed
Jan D.H. Jongbloed
RHRay E. Hershberger
Ray E. Hershberger
AMAna Morales
Ana Morales
DJDaniel Judge
Daniel Judge
JTJ.Peter van Tintelen
J.Peter van Tintelen
Background: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited disease characterized by ventricular arrhythmias and progressive ventricular dysfunction. Genetic testing is recommended, and a pathogenic variant in an ARVC-associated gene is a major criterion for diagnosis according to the 2010 Task Force Criteria. As incorrect attribution of a gene to ARVC can contribute to misdiagnosis, we assembled an international multidisciplinary ARVC Clinical Genome Resource Gene Curation Expert Panel to reappraise all reported ARVC genes. Methods: Following a comprehensive literature search, six 2-member teams conducted blinded independent curation of reported ARVC genes using the semiquantitative Clinical Genome Resource framework. Results: Of 26 reported ARVC genes, only 6 ( PKP2 , DSP , DSG2 , DSC2 , JUP , and TMEM43 ) had strong evidence and were classified as definitive for ARVC causation. There was moderate evidence for 2 genes, DES and PLN . The remaining 18 genes had limited or no evidence. RYR2 was refuted as an ARVC gene since clinical data and model systems exhibited a catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia phenotype. In ClinVar, only 5 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (1.1%) in limited evidence genes had been reported in ARVC cases in contrast to 450 desmosome gene variants (97.4%). Conclusions: Using the Clinical Genome Resource approach to gene-disease curation, only 8 genes ( PKP2 , DSP , DSG2 , DSC2 , JUP , TMEM43 , PLN , and DES ) had definitive or moderate evidence for ARVC, and these genes accounted for nearly all pathogenic/likely pathogenic ARVC variants in ClinVar. Therefore, only pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in these 8 genes should yield a major criterion for ARVC diagnosis. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants identified in other genes in a patient should prompt further phenotyping as variants in many of these genes are associated with other cardiovascular conditions.

11 June 2021 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TVTom E Verstraelen
Tom E Verstraelen
FLFreyja H M van Lint
Freyja H M van Lint
LBLaurens P Bosman
Laurens P Bosman
RBRemco de Brouwer
Remco de Brouwer
VPVirginnio M Proost
Virginnio M Proost
AWArthur A M Wilde
Arthur A M Wilde
This study aims to improve risk stratification for primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation by developing a new mutation-specific prediction model for malignant ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in phospholamban (PLN) p.Arg14del mutation carriers. The proposed model is compared to an existing PLN risk model. Data were collected from PLN p.Arg14del mutation carriers with no history of malignant VA at baseline, identified between 2009 and 2020. Malignant VA was defined as sustained VA, appropriate ICD intervention, or (aborted) sudden cardiac death. A prediction model was developed using Cox regression. The study cohort consisted of 679 PLN p.Arg14del mutation carriers, with a minority of index patients (17%) and male sex (43%), and a median age of 42 years [interquartile range (IQR) 27–55]. During a median follow-up of 4.3 years (IQR 1.7–7.4), 72 (10.6%) carriers experienced malignant VA. Significant predictors were left ventricular ejection fraction, premature ventricular contraction count/24 h, amount of negative T waves, and presence of low-voltage electrocardiogram. The multivariable model had an excellent discriminative ability {C-statistic 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78–0.88]}. Applying the existing PLN risk model to the complete cohort yielded a C-statistic of 0.68 (95% CI 0.61–0.75). This new mutation-specific prediction model for individual VA risk in PLN p.Arg14del mutation carriers is superior to the existing PLN risk model, suggesting that risk prediction using mutation-specific phenotypic features can improve accuracy compared to a more generic approach. Malignant VA risk prediction in PLN p.Arg14del carriers. With the mutation specific risk factors low and high risk groups can be identified. PLN, Phospholamban; VA, Ventricular arrhythmia.

4 August 2017 in Cardiovascular Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EHEdgar T. Hoorntje
Edgar T. Hoorntje
WRWouter P. Te Rijdt
Wouter P. Te Rijdt
CJCynthia A. James
Cynthia A. James
KPKalliopi Pilichou
Kalliopi Pilichou
CBCristina Basso
Cristina Basso
JTJ.Peter van Tintelen
J.Peter van Tintelen
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a rare, heritable heart disease characterized by fibro-fatty replacement of the myocardium and a high degree of electric instability. It was first thought to be a congenital disorder, but is now regarded as a dystrophic heart muscle disease that develops over time. There is no curative treatment and current treatment strategies focus on attenuating the symptoms, slowing disease progression, and preventing life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Identification of mutations in genes encoding desmosomal proteins and in other genes has led to insights into the disease pathogenesis and greatly facilitated identification of family members at risk. The disease phenotype is, however, highly variable and characterized by incomplete penetrance. Although the reasons are still poorly understood, sex, endurance exercise and a gene-dosage effect seem to play a role in these phenomena. The discovery of the genes and mutations implicated in ACM has allowed animal and cellular models to be generated, enabling researchers to start unravelling it’s underlying molecular mechanisms. Observations in humans and in animal models suggest that reduced cell–cell adhesion affects gap junction and ion channel remodelling at the intercalated disc, and along with impaired desmosomal function, these can lead to perturbations in signalling cascades like the Wnt/β-catenin and Hippo/YAP pathways. Perturbations of these pathways are also thought to lead to fibro-fatty replacement. A better understanding of the molecular processes may lead to new therapies that target specific pathways involved in ACM.