Misha Zolotov

Dr. Misha Zolotov

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 December 2007 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MZMisha Zolotov
Misha Zolotov

27 July 2007 in Journal of Geophysical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MZMisha Zolotov
Misha Zolotov
MMMikhail V. Mironenko
Mikhail V. Mironenko

13 April 2010 in Space Science Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FSFrank Sohl
Frank Sohl
MCMathieu Choukroun
Mathieu Choukroun
JKJeffrey Kargel
Jeffrey Kargel
JKJun Kimura
Jun Kimura
RPRobert Pappalardo
Robert Pappalardo
MZMisha Zolotov
Misha Zolotov

1 November 2006 in Meteoritics & Planetary Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MZMisha Zolotov
Misha Zolotov
MMMikhail V. Mironenko
Mikhail V. Mironenko
ESEverett L. Shock
Everett L. Shock

7 October 2022 in Space Science Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CGCedric Gillmann
Cedric Gillmann
Michael WayMichael Way
Michael Way
GAGuillaume Avice
Guillaume Avice
Doris BreuerDoris Breuer
Doris Breuer
GGGregor Golabek
Gregor Golabek
MZMisha Zolotov
Misha Zolotov
This work reviews the long-term evolution of the atmosphere of Venus, and modulation of its composition by interior/exterior cycling. The formation and evolution of Venus’s atmosphere, leading to contemporary surface conditions, remain hotly debated topics, and involve questions that tie into many disciplines. We explore these various inter-related mechanisms which shaped the evolution of the atmosphere, starting with the volatile sources and sinks. Going from the deep interior to the top of the atmosphere, we describe volcanic outgassing, surface-atmosphere interactions, and atmosphere escape. Furthermore, we address more complex aspects of the history of Venus, including the role of Late Accretion impacts, how magnetic field generation is tied into long-term evolution, and the implications of geochemical and geodynamical feedback cycles for atmospheric evolution. We highlight plausible end-member evolutionary pathways that Venus could have followed, from accretion to its present-day state, based on modeling and observations. In a first scenario, the planet was desiccated by atmospheric escape during the magma ocean phase. In a second scenario, Venus could have harbored surface liquid water for long periods of time, until its temperate climate was destabilized and it entered a runaway greenhouse phase. In a third scenario, Venus’s inefficient outgassing could have kept water inside the planet, where hydrogen was trapped in the core and the mantle was oxidized. We discuss existing evidence and future observations/missions required to refine our understanding of the planet’s history and of the complex feedback cycles between the interior, surface, and atmosphere that have been operating in the past, present or future of Venus.

5 June 2004 in Journal of Geophysical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MZMisha Zolotov
Misha Zolotov
ESEverett L. Shock
Everett L. Shock