Vito D'Andrea

Dr. Vito D'Andrea

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Lazio, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 January 2022 in Frontiers in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Vito D'AndreaVito D'Andrea
Vito D'Andrea
GPGiorgia Prontera
Giorgia Prontera
SRSerena Antonia Rubortone
Serena Antonia Rubortone
LPLucilla Pezza
Lucilla Pezza
GPGiovanni Pinna
Giovanni Pinna
GVGiovanni Vento
Giovanni Vento
The umbilical venous catheter (UVC) is one of the most commonly used central lines in neonates. It can be easily inserted soon after birth providing stable intravenous access in infants requiring advanced resuscitation in the delivery room or needing medications, fluids, and parenteral nutrition during the 1st days of life. Resident training is crucial for UVC placement. The use of simulators allows trainees to gain practical experience and confidence in performing the procedure without risks for patients. UVCs are easy to insert, however when the procedure is performed without the use of ultrasound, there is a quite high risk, up to 40%, of non-central position. Ultrasound-guided UVC tip location is a simple and learnable technique and therefore should be widespread among all physicians. The feasibility of targeted training on the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for UVC placement in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) among neonatal medical staff has been demonstrated. Conversely, UVC-related complications are very common and can sometimes be life-threatening. Despite UVCs being used by neonatologists for over 60 years, there are still no standard guidelines for assessment or monitoring of tip location, securement, management, or dwell time. This review article is an overview of the current knowledge and evidence available in the literature about UVCs. Our aim is to provide precise and updated recommendations on the use of this central line.

1 June 2011 in Early Human Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SFSergio Ferrazzani
Sergio Ferrazzani
RLRita Luciano
Rita Luciano
SGSerafina Garofalo
Serafina Garofalo
Vito D'AndreaVito D'Andrea
Vito D'Andrea
Sara De CarolisSara De Carolis
Sara De Carolis
ACAlessandro Caruso
Alessandro Caruso

9 May 2022 in The Journal of Vascular Access
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMauro Pittiruti
Mauro Pittiruti
DCDavide Celentano
Davide Celentano
Giovanni BaroneGiovanni Barone
Giovanni Barone
Vito D'AndreaVito D'Andrea
Vito D'Andrea
MAMaria Giuseppina Annetta
Maria Giuseppina Annetta
GCGiorgio Conti
Giorgio Conti
Background: In the pediatric patient, central venous catheterization may be associated with relevant complications. Though, most of them may be prevented by a wise choice of materials, methods, and techniques. Evidence-based insertion bundles for central venous catheterization have been developed in the adult patient, but not in neonates and children. Methods: The Italian Group for Long Term Venous Access Devices (GAVeCeLT) has developed an insertion bundle for central venous catheterization in neonates, infants, and children, which includes seven evidence-based strategies: (1) preprocedural ultrasound evaluation, (2) appropriate aseptic technique, (3) ultrasound guided venipuncture, (4) intraprocedural tip location by non-radiological methods, (5) proper choice of the exit site by tunneling, (6) sutureless securement, and (7) protection of the exit site using glue and transparent membranes. The effectiveness and safety of this bundle has been tested in a prospective study. Results: All neonates, infants and children requiring a non-emergency central line (except for umbilical venous catheters and epicutaneo-cava catheters) were included in the study. Out of 729 central line insertions, there were no immediate complications (no pneumothorax, no arterial puncture, no malposition); the incidence of early and late complications (local ecchymosis, dislodgment, local pain, exit site infection) was 3.7%; in the first 2 weeks after insertion, no catheter-related bacterial infection or catheter-related thrombosis was recorded. Conclusion: The results of this prospective study strongly validate the hypothesis that an insertion bundle is highly effective in optimizing the safety of the maneuver, reducing immediate, early, and late complications.

10 July 2020 in The Journal of Vascular Access
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Giovanni BaroneGiovanni Barone
Giovanni Barone
MPMauro Pittiruti
Mauro Pittiruti
GAGina Ancora
Gina Ancora
GVGiovanni Vento
Giovanni Vento
FTFrancesca Tota
Francesca Tota
Vito D'AndreaVito D'Andrea
Vito D'Andrea
Objective: Central venous access in critically ill newborns can be challenging. Ultrasound-guided brachio-cephalic vein catheterization is a relatively new procedure, recently introduced in several neonatal intensive care units. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of such a technique in preterm babies. Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on ultrasound-guided central venous catheter insertion in preterm neonates. Setting: Neonatal intensive care unit. Patients: Critically ill preterm neonates with weight below 1500 g requiring a central access. Interventions: Ultrasound-guided brachio-cephalic vein catheterization. Main Results: Thirty centrally inserted catheters were placed in 30 neonates. The success rate of the procedure was 100%. No case of accidental arterial or pleural puncture was registered during the study period. Conclusion: The brachio-cephalic vein can be safely catheterized in preterm newborns requiring intensive care after appropriate training.

1 February 2021 in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GVGiovanni Vento
Giovanni Vento
MVMaria Luisa Ventura
Maria Luisa Ventura
RPRoberta Pastorino
Roberta Pastorino
AKAnton H van Kaam
Anton H van Kaam
VCVirgilio Carnielli
Virgilio Carnielli
JPJ Jane Pillow
J Jane Pillow

3 May 2011 in The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AZAntonio Alberto Zuppa
Antonio Alberto Zuppa
Vito D'AndreaVito D'Andrea
Vito D'Andrea
PCPiero Catenazzi
Piero Catenazzi
ASAntonio Scorrano
Antonio Scorrano
CRCostantino Romagnoli
Costantino Romagnoli
Objective. Conjunctivitis during neonatal period occurs in 1–12% of all babies. Ophthalmia neonatorum is an acute muco-purulent conjunctivitis occurring in the first month of birth. It is essentially an infection acquired during vaginal delivery. The most frequent infectious agents involved in ophthalmia neonatorum are Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Methods. Topical ocular prophylaxis must be instituted early after birth. Recommended prophylactic regimen are: 1% nitrate solution; 1% tetracycline solution; 1% erythromycin solution; 2.5% povidone-iodine solution; and fusidic acid. Results. Evidence suggests better outcomes using 1% tetracycline solutions even if there is the risk of selecting drug resistant bacteria. However, even the widespread used nitrate solution can cause a chemical conjunctivitis, arguing against its widespread use. Conclusions. Fusidic acid is a relatively new promising therapy even if there are still few data about its use. None of the used regimens has the optimal risk-benefit profile to suggest a widespread use.