Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet #Preprint #PeerReviewMe: Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint. Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn. Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period. Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author). Background: The available methods for monitoring food intake—which for a great part rely on self-report—often provide biased and incomplete data. Currently, no good technological solutions are available. Hence, the SPLENDID eating detection sensor (i.e., an ear-worn device) was developed to enable complete and objective measurements of eating events. The technical performance of this device has been described before. To date, literature is lacking a description of how such a device is perceived and experienced by potential users. Objective: To describe how potential users perceived and experienced the SPLENDID eating detection sensor during the different stages of its development. Methods: Potential users evaluated the eating detection sensor at different stages of its development: 1) At the start twelve health professionals (e.g., dieticians or personal trainers) were interviewed and a focus group was held with five potential end-users (m/w = 0/5, age: 22±2 yrs., BMI: 22.5±1.9 kg/m2) to find out about their thoughts on the concept of the eating detection sensor. 2) The first prototypes of the eating detection sensor were tested in a laboratory setting where 23 participants (m/w = 13/10, age: 23±3 yrs., BMI: 22.6±3 kg/m2) reported their experiences. 3) The first wearable version of the eating detection sensor was tested in a semi-controlled study where 22 young, overweight adults (m/w = 3/19, age: 23±2 yrs., BMI: 28.0±2.3 kg/m) used the sensor on two days and reported their experiences. 4) The final version of the sensor was tested in a 4-week feasibility study by 20 young, overweight adults (m/w = 4/16, age: 25±2 yrs., BMI: 28.8±2.8 kg/m2) who reported their experiences. Results: Most individuals were enthusiastic about the concept across the different stages of development. It, however, was stressed multiple times that it is critical that the device is discrete and comfortable to wear for a longer period of time. The experiences of the potential users with the eating detection sensor show that some participants would like the sensor to be less noticeable, but that the device needs to be further improved on wearer comfort especially. In final study the eating detection sensor received a grade of 3.7 for wearer comfort, on a scale of 1 to 10. Moreover, experienced discomfort was the main reason for wearing the eating detection sensor less than two hours a day. The participants reported to have used the eating detection sensor on, on average, 19 out of 28 days. Conclusions: The SPLENDID eating detection sensor is a promising new device that can facilitate the collection of reliable food intake data, as shown by its technical potential, which has been described before. Potential users are enthusiastic, but in order to be successful the wearer comfort and discreteness of the device need to be improved. Clinical Trial: n.a.