Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming thoracic surgery by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, surgical precision, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative management. AI-driven technologies, including machine learning (ML), deep learning, computer vision, and robotic-assisted surgery, have the potential to optimize clinical workflows and improve patient outcomes. However, challenges such as data integration, ethical concerns, and regulatory barriers must be addressed to ensure AI’s safe and effective implementation. This review aims to analyze the current applications, benefits, limitations, and future directions of AI in thoracic surgery. Methods: This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for studies published up to January 2025. Relevant articles were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on AI applications in thoracic surgery, including diagnostics, robotic-assisted surgery, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative care. A risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies. Results: Out of 279 identified studies, 36 met the inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis, highlighting AI’s growing role in diagnostic accuracy, surgical precision, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative care in thoracic surgery. AI-driven imaging analysis and radiomics have improved pulmonary nodule detection, lung cancer classification, and lymph node metastasis prediction, while robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has enhanced surgical accuracy, reduced operative times, and improved recovery rates. Intraoperatively, AI-powered image-guided navigation, augmented reality (AR), and real-time decision-support systems have optimized surgical planning and safety. Postoperatively, AI-driven predictive models and wearable monitoring devices have enabled early complication detection and improved patient follow-up. However, challenges remain, including algorithmic biases, a lack of multicenter validation, high implementation costs, and ethical concerns regarding data security and clinical accountability. Despite these limitations, AI has shown significant potential to enhance surgical outcomes, requiring further research and standardized validation for widespread adoption. Conclusions: AI is poised to revolutionize thoracic surgery by enhancing decision-making, improving patient outcomes, and optimizing surgical workflows. However, widespread adoption requires addressing key limitations through multicenter validation studies, standardized AI frameworks, and ethical AI governance. Future research should focus on digital twin technology, federated learning, and explainable AI (XAI) to improve AI interpretability, reliability, and accessibility. With continued advancements and responsible integration, AI will play a pivotal role in shaping the next generation of precision thoracic surgery.

Background: Postoperative air leak (PAL) is a frequent and potentially serious complication following thoracic surgery, characterized by the persistent escape of air from the lung into the pleural space. It is associated with extended hospitalizations, increased morbidity, and elevated healthcare costs. Understanding the mechanisms, risk factors, and effective management strategies for PAL is crucial in improving surgical outcomes. Aim: This review seeks to synthesize all known data concerning PAL, including its etiology, risk factors, diagnostic approaches, and the range of available treatments from conservative measures to surgical interventions, with a special focus on the use of autologous plasma. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search of databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted for studies and reviews published on PAL following thoracic surgery. The selection criteria aimed to include articles that provided insights into the incidence, mechanisms, risk assessment, diagnostic methods, and treatment options for PAL. Special attention was given to studies detailing the use of autologous plasma in managing this complication. Results: PAL is influenced by a variety of patient-related, surgical, and perioperative factors. Diagnosis primarily relies on clinical observation and imaging, with severity assessments guiding management decisions. Conservative treatments, including chest tube management and physiotherapy, serve as the initial approach, while persistent leaks may necessitate surgical intervention. Autologous plasma has emerged as a promising treatment, offering a novel mechanism for enhancing pleural healing and reducing air leak duration, although evidence is still evolving. Conclusions: Effective management of PAL requires a multifaceted approach tailored to the individual patient’s needs and the specifics of their condition. Beyond the traditional treatment approaches, innovative treatment modalities offer the potential to improve outcomes for patients experiencing PAL after thoracic surgery. Further research is needed to optimize treatment protocols and integrate new therapies into clinical practice.

Lung herniation is a rare clinical entity defined by extrathoracic protrusion of the lung or lung tissue due to a weakness in the thoracic wall. We present here a case of a 72-year-old male who presented with a spontaneous lung herniation, which occurred as a result of a ventral luxation of the third rib from the sternocostal joint due to vigorous coughing. The defect was repaired through anterolateral thoracotomy, reposition of the lung and approximating the ribs using heavy sutures. The postoperative course of the patient was uncomplicated. A brief review of the literature is also provided.

Pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer represents a key component in modern oncological surgery, balancing precision resection with systemic disease management. Despite ongoing debate initiated by randomized trials, the surgical removal of lung metastases continues to offer significant survival benefits in well-selected patients. This review synthesizes the evolving landscape of pulmonary metastasectomy, integrating classical prognostic indicators, such as the disease-free interval (DFI) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, with emerging molecular insights including KRAS and BRAF mutations. The relationship between surgical radicality, systemic therapies, and personalized genetic profiling is redefining patient selection and optimizing outcomes. By dissecting recent evidence and ongoing controversies, we clarify the complex decision-making required to navigate this complex clinical terrain. Ultimately, the synergy of multidisciplinary care and precision surgery holds the promise of durable disease control and extended survival in colorectal cancer patients with lung metastases.

Introduction: Delirium is one of the most common and serious neuropsychiatric complications following cardiac surgery. It is associated with increased mortality, prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, long-term cognitive decline, and reduced quality of life. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study is to synthesize current evidence on the epidemiology, psychiatric and psychosocial risk factors, biological mechanisms, perioperative modifiers, prevention strategies, and long-term outcomes of delirium after cardiac surgery, with particular emphasis on its role as a marker of brain vulnerability. Materials and Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using articles published between 1990 and 2025, identified through the PubMed and ScienceDirect databases. The search strategy included the terms “delirium,” “cardiac surgery,” “psychiatric disorders,” and “cognitive impairment.” Results: Recent evidence suggests that approximately one quarter of patients undergoing cardiac surgery develop delirium, with hypoactive forms frequently remaining underrecognized in clinical practice. Pre-existing depression, cognitive impairment, substance use disorders, low educational level, frailty, and social isolation significantly increase the risk of postoperative delirium. Within a stress–diathesis framework, peripheral physiological insults may be reflected centrally as acute brain dysfunction in vulnerable individuals. Modifiable perioperative factors include sedative choice and depth, as well as sleep and circadian disruption. Multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions, early mobilization, structured psychiatric and cognitive screening, and dexmedetomidine-based sedation have demonstrated consistent efficacy in reducing the incidence and/or duration of delirium. Furthermore, delirium has been associated with persistent cognitive and psychiatric morbidity, functional decline, and increased long-term mortality. Conclusions: Delirium following cardiac surgery is a multifactorial syndrome with significant short- and long-term consequences. A comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach integrating biological, psychiatric, and perioperative perspectives is essential for effective risk stratification, prevention, and long-term follow-up.

Cardiac surgery, now a routine medical intervention, was once deemed unthinkable—not merely due to technical limitations, but because of deep-seated cultural, religious, and philosophical prohibitions. This article traces the historical and ethical trajectory of the human heart from a sacred, inviolable symbol of the soul to a surgically accessible organ. Through an interdisciplinary lens that integrates medical history, anthropology, theology, and contemporary bioethics, we examine how shifts in metaphysical belief, technological progress, and moral reasoning gradually legitimized cardiac intervention. From ancient Egyptian funerary rites and classical cardiocentric models to medieval religious taboos and Enlightenment redefinitions of the body, the heart’s transformation reflects broader changes in how humanity conceives life, death, and identity. The emergence of modern cardiac surgery, especially heart transplantation and extracorporeal technologies, raised new ethical dilemmas, challenging the boundaries between tissue and meaning, biology and personhood. This study argues that despite its clinical secularization, the heart retains a unique symbolic gravity that continues to shape public perception and professional responsibility. In the age of precision medicine, cardiac surgery remains not only a technical act but an existential gesture—a transgression that demands both scientific mastery and moral reverence.