Richard T Lee

Dr. Richard T Lee


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2022 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJun J Mao
Jun J Mao
NINofisat Ismaila
Nofisat Ismaila
TBTing Bao
Ting Bao
DBDebra Barton
Debra Barton
EBEran Ben-Arye
Eran Ben-Arye
Eduardo BrueraEduardo Bruera
Eduardo Bruera
PURPOSE: The aim of this joint guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and other health care providers on integrative approaches to managing pain in patients with cancer. METHODS: The Society for Integrative Oncology and ASCO convened an expert panel of integrative oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, palliative oncology, social sciences, mind-body medicine, nursing, and patient advocacy representatives. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2021. Outcomes of interest included pain intensity, symptom relief, and adverse events. Expert panel members used this evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS: The literature search identified 227 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS: Among adult patients, acupuncture should be recommended for aromatase inhibitor–related joint pain. Acupuncture or reflexology or acupressure may be recommended for general cancer pain or musculoskeletal pain. Hypnosis may be recommended to patients who experience procedural pain. Massage may be recommended to patients experiencing pain during palliative or hospice care. These recommendations are based on an intermediate level of evidence, benefit outweighing risk, and with moderate strength of recommendation. The quality of evidence for other mind-body interventions or natural products for pain is either low or inconclusive. There is insufficient or inconclusive evidence to make recommendations for pediatric patients. More research is needed to better characterize the role of integrative medicine interventions in the care of patients with cancer. Additional information is available at https://integrativeonc.org/practice-guidelines/guidelines and www.asco.org/survivorship-guidelines .

1 July 2021 in JCO Oncology Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FHFay J Hlubocky
Fay J Hlubocky
BSBanu E. Symington
Banu E. Symington
DMDaniel C. McFarland
Daniel C. McFarland
CGColleen M Gallagher
Colleen M Gallagher
KDKonstantin H. Dragnev
Konstantin H. Dragnev
TSTait D. Shanafelt
Tait D. Shanafelt

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GSGeorge B Semeniuk
George B Semeniuk
BBBahareh Bahadini
Bahareh Bahadini
EAEugene Ahn
Eugene Ahn
Jasmine M. ZainJasmine M. Zain
Jasmine M. Zain
Jessica T ChengJessica T Cheng
Jessica T Cheng
RLRichard T Lee
Richard T Lee
Integrative oncology is a new and growing field of cancer care. Integrative oncology is a patient-centered, evidence-based field of comprehensive cancer care that utilizes integrative therapies such as mind-body practices, acupuncture, massage, music therapy, nutrition, and exercise in collaboration with conventional cancer treatments. Patient interest and utilization has been growing over the past two decades. Clinical research has shown the benefits of these approaches to improving symptom management and quality of life, and is now being incorporated into national guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO). The availability of these services at cancer centers is growing, although the structure and implementation of integrative oncology remains highly variable. This article discusses the benefits of integrative oncology and provides an overview of the current state of integrative oncology programs nationwide. Current challenges and opportunities for cancer centers to provide integrative services is reviewed in the areas of programmatic structure, clinical service, education, and research.

1 February 2021 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RLRichard T Lee
Richard T Lee
NKNancy Kwon
Nancy Kwon
JWJimin Wu
Jimin Wu
CTConnie To
Connie To
STSteven To
Steven To
JRJamie Von Roenn
Jamie Von Roenn

9 January 2014 in Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CRChelsea G. Ratcliff
Chelsea G. Ratcliff
SPSarah Prinsloo
Sarah Prinsloo
MRMichael Richardson
Michael Richardson
LBLaura Baynham-Fletcher
Laura Baynham-Fletcher
RLRichard T Lee
Richard T Lee
LCLorenzo Cohen
Lorenzo Cohen
Objectives. This study examines the short‐ and long‐term QOL benefits of a music therapy intervention for patients recovering from hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Methods. Ninety allogeneic HSCT patients, after transplant, were randomized to receive ISO‐principle (i.e., mood matching) based music therapy (MT; n = 29), unstructured music (UM; n = 30), or usual care (UC; n = 31) for four weeks. The ISO principle posits that patients may shift their mood from one state to another by listening to music that is “equal to” the individual’s initial mood state and subsequently listening to music selections that gradually shift in tempo and mood to match the patient’s desired disposition. Participants in MT and UM groups developed two audio CDs to help them feel more relaxed and energized and were instructed to use the CDs to improve their mood as needed. Short‐term effects on mood and long‐term effects on QOL were examined. Results. MT and UM participants reported improved mood immediately after listening to CDs; the within‐group effect was greater for UM participants compared to MT participants. Participant group was not associated with long‐term QOL outcomes. Conclusions. Music listening improves mood acutely but was not associated with long‐term benefits in this study.

1 November 2021 in JCO Oncology Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OLOlivia M. Larbi
Olivia M. Larbi
CJCherry Jiang
Cherry Jiang
BMBethanny McLane
Bethanny McLane
GWGi-Ming Wang
Gi-Ming Wang
KDKatherine Daunov
Katherine Daunov
RLRichard T Lee
Richard T Lee
PURPOSE: Complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) services are more prevalent in cancer centers but continue to be underutilized by patients. This study examines perspectives from patients and caregivers about these services being offered at a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: Patients and caregivers were surveyed about their familiarity, interest, and experience with five CIM therapies: acupuncture, massage, meditation, music therapy, and yoga. Respondents were asked about their interest in and/or paying for these services at baseline, when recommended by their medical team, and when offered in a clinical trial. Respondents were also asked about perceived barriers to accessing these services. Chi-squared tests were performed to explore associations between past experience, interest levels, and willingness to pay. RESULTS: A total of 576 surveys were obtained (464 patients and 112 caregivers). Most respondents identified as White or Caucasian (65.6%), female (57.2%), had been a patient for < 3 years (74.2%), had some college education (73.8%), and made > $40,000 in US dollars as their annual household income (69.1%). Respondents were most familiar with therapeutic massage (34.2%) and least familiar with acupuncture (20.0%). The average interest in these services increased from 53.3% to 64.1% when recommended by a medical professional. Respondents were most willing to pay $1-60 for therapeutic massage (62.3%) and least willing to pay for meditation (43.7%). The main barriers to accessing CIM services were cost (56.0%) and lack of knowledge (52.1%). CONCLUSION: Overall, a significant proportion of patients and caregivers were unfamiliar with these five integrative therapies. Increasing education, decreasing cost, and a recommendation by medical professionals would improve CIM usage.