Philip Brey

Prof. Philip Brey


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 April 2012 in NanoEthics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBPhilip Brey
Philip Brey

21 September 2023 in AI and Ethics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBPhilip Brey
Philip Brey
BDBrandt Dainow
Brandt Dainow
In this paper, we present an approach for the systematic and comprehensive inclusion of ethical considerations in the design and development process of artificial intelligence systems, called Ethics by Design for AI (EbD-AI). The approach is the result of a three-year long research effort, and has recently be adopted by the European Commission as part of its ethics review procedure for AI projects. We describe and explain the approach and its different components and its application to the development of AI software and systems. We also compare it to other approaches in AI ethics, and we consider limitations of the approach as well as potential criticisms.

24 May 2012 in Ethics and Information Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBPhilip Brey
Philip Brey

28 September 2017 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAgata Gurzawska
Agata Gurzawska
PBPhilip Brey
Philip Brey
MMMarkus Mäkinen
Markus Mäkinen
: Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is a term used by policy-makers and academics to refer to research and innovation that is ethically acceptable and socially desirable. Despite the fact that the vast majority of research and innovation (R&I) is funded and produced by industry, companies tend to have no awareness or recognition of this concept. This is unfortunate, as the RRI paradigm could be mutually beneficial for both business and society: it could help businesses realise competitive opportunities while also leading to positive economic, societal and environmental impacts. This paper investigates how industry can be incentivised to engage in research and innovation following the approach of RRI. We propose a matrix of incentives for stimulating the adoption of RRI. We categorise incentives according to three dichotomies: external and internal, instrumental and non-instrumental, direct and indirect. The incentives are formalised in a causal loop diagram, which can be used to demonstrate the sound character of investing in RRI from a business perspective. We discuss examples of incentives, including corporate reputation and critical consumerism, certification, employee engagement, and governance. Lastly, to ensure effective implementation of RRI, we outline factors for the realisation of successful incentives for RRI in industry.

1 September 2005 in Ethics and Information Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBPhilip Brey
Philip Brey

27 October 2005 in Minds and Machines
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBPhilip Brey
Philip Brey