Both forest management—especially forest tending—and afforestation help to enhance the carbon sequestration of forest vegetation. However, with limited resources, appropriate measures need to be selected to increase the vegetation carbon sinks based on regional endowments. This study aimed to assess the differences in the effects and costs of afforestation and forest tending on vegetation carbon sequestration and to help select suitable afforestation and forest tending areas. In this paper, we used panel fixed effects models to analyze the effects of afforestation and forest tending on vegetation carbon sequestration and conducted a regional heterogeneity analysis to identify suitable afforestation and tending areas. Our results show that the vegetation carbon sequestration capacity of forest tending is 4.48 times higher than that of afforestation, and there is obvious spatial heterogeneity in the effects of afforestation and forest tending on vegetation carbon sequestration. Specifically, the marginal contribution of afforestation is higher than that of tending in northwest and southwest China, whereas the marginal contribution of tending is greater in other regions. Additionally, the afforestation cost for vegetation carbon sequestration is 44.44 times higher than that of tending. Therefore, the management of existing forests must be enhanced, especially in northeastern, southern, and northern China. Similar to the northwest and southwest regions of China, there is still a need to emphasize the use of suitable space for afforestation.

Enhancing carbon sequestration capacity through effective forest management is a critical strategy for mitigating climate change. China has established public administrations, known as state-owned forest farms (SFFs), primarily to manage state-owned forests. This study examines the carbon sequestration effects of forestry investment made by 211 SFFs in Shaanxi Province from 2000 to 2018, using a panel fixed effects model and a panel threshold model. The findings reveal that SFF investment has a significant time-lag effect on carbon sequestration, with the marginal contribution peaking three years after the initial investment. Additionally, the impact of investment exhibits spatial heterogeneity, varying across regions due to differences in environmental and ecological conditions. Threshold effects are also identified, indicating that the effectiveness of carbon sequestration is constrained by the scale and structure of investment, with diminishing returns observed beyond optimal levels. Furthermore, we found that investment increases carbon sequestration mainly by expanding forest area and improving forest quality. These findings underscore the importance of cost-effectiveness analyses to optimize forestry investment decisions. SFFs are advised to prioritize appropriate investment timing, regions, scales, and structures to achieve optimal carbon sequestration benefits and maximize resource utilization, supporting sustainable forest management and climate change mitigation efforts.

Many countries have established grassroots forestry institutions to manage and protect small-scale forestry resources and provide technology and services to private foresters. Since the inception of township forestry workstations (TFWs) in China almost 70 years ago, TFW has supported resource protection and forest property reform. In this paper, we employ fixed effect models to test the effects of TFW on collective forest carbon density and provide evidence for improving the quality of collective forests. Our results demonstrate that TFWs in China improve the carbon density of collective forests by performing forestry management and service functions. However, significant differences in TFWs exist under different management systems, and the dual leadership township forestry workstation (D_TWF) is more effective in increasing the carbon density of collective forests. The management system’s heterogeneity directly affects its performance, with D_TWF performing better management functions and the single leadership township forestry workstation (S_TWF) performing better service functions. These results underscore the importance of reforming the TFW management system in accordance with local conditions. In areas with abundant forest resources, the TFW’s management system should shift to single leadership (jurisdictional or vertical management). In forest resource-scarce regions, the TFW’s management system should change to dual leadership.