Olivier Verneau

Dr. Olivier Verneau


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 May 2006 in Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AŠAndrea Šimková
Andrea Šimková
OVOlivier Verneau
Olivier Verneau
MGMilan Gelnar
Milan Gelnar
Serge MorandSerge Morand
Serge Morand
Patterns and likely processes connected with evolution of host specificity in congeneric monogeneans parasitizing fish species of the Cyprinidae were investigated. A total of 51 Dactylogyrus species was included. We investigated (1) the link between host specificity and parasite phylogeny; (2) the morphometric correlates of host specificity, parasite body size, and variables of attachment organs important for host specificity; (3) the evolution of morphological adaptation, that is, attachment organ; (4) the determinants of host specificity following the hypothesis of specialization on more predictable resources considering maximal body size, maximal longevity, and abundance as measures of host predictability; and (5) the potential link between host specificity and parasite diversification. Host specificity, expressed as an index of host specificity including phylogenetic and taxonomic relatedness of hosts, was partially associated with parasite phylogeny, but no significant contribution of host phylogeny was found. The mapping of host specificity into the phylogenetic tree suggests that being specialist is not a derived condition for Dactylogyrus species. The different morphometric traits of the attachment apparatus seem to be selected in connection with specialization of specialist parasites and other traits favored as adaptations in generalist parasites. Parasites widespread on several host species reach higher abundance within hosts, which supports the hypothesis of ecological specialization. When separating specialists and generalists, we confirmed the hypothesis of specialization on a predictable resource; that is, specialists with larger anchors tend to live on fish species with larger body size and greater longevity, which could be also interpreted as a mechanism for optimizing morphological adaptation. We demonstrated that ecology of host species could also be recognized as an important determinant of host specificity. The mapping of morphological characters of the attachment organ onto the parasite phylogenetic tree reveals that morphological evolution of the attachment organ is connected with host specificity in the context of fish relatedness, especially at the level of host subfamilies. Finally, we did not find that host specificity leads to parasite diversification in congeneric monogeneans.

18 July 2011 in Parasitology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OVOlivier Verneau
Olivier Verneau
CPC. Palacios
C. Palacios
TPT. Platt
T. Platt
MAM. Alday
M. Alday
EBE. Billard
E. Billard
LPL. H. DU Preez
L. H. DU Preez
SUMMARY: One of the major threats to biodiversity involves biological invasions with direct consequences on the stability of ecosystems. In this context, the role of parasites is not negligible as it may enhance the success of invaders. The red-eared slider,Trachemys scripta elegans, has been globally considered among the worst invasive species. Since its introduction through the pet trade,T. s. elegansis now widespread and represents a threat for indigenous species. BecauseT. s. eleganscoexists withEmys orbicularisandMauremys leprosain Europe, it has been suggested it may compete with the native turtle species and transmit pathogens. We examined parasite transfer from American captive to the two native species that co-exist in artificial pools of a Turtle Farm in France. As model parasite species we used platyhelminth worms of the family Polystomatidae (Monogenea) because polystomes have been described from American turtles in their native range. Phylogenetic relationships among polystomes parasitizing chelonian host species that are geographically widespread show patterns of diversification more complex than expected. Using DNA barcoding to identify species from adult and/or polystome eggs, several cases of host switching from exotic to indigenous individuals were illustrated, corroborating that parasite transmission is important when considering the pet trade and in reintroduction programmes to reinforce wild populations of indigenous species.

18 August 2011 in Systematic Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMathieu Badets
Mathieu Badets
IWIan Whittington
Ian Whittington
FLFabrice Lalubin
Fabrice Lalubin
AJAllienne Jean-François
Allienne Jean-François
JMJean-Luc Maspimby
Jean-Luc Maspimby
OVOlivier Verneau
Olivier Verneau
Investigating patterns and processes of parasite diversification over ancient geological periods should involve comparisons of host and parasite phylogenies in a biogeographic context. It has been shown previously that the geographical distribution of host-specific parasites of sarcopterygians was guided, from Palaeozoic to Cainozoic times, mostly by evolution and diversification of their freshwater hosts. Here, we propose phylogenies of neobatrachian frogs and their specific parasites (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea) to investigate coevolutionary processes and historical biogeography of polystomes and further discuss all the possible assumptions that may account for the early evolution of these parasites. Phylogenetic analyses of concatenated rRNA nuclear genes (18S and partial 28S) supplemented by cophylogenetic and biogeographic vicariance analyses reveal four main parasite lineages that can be ascribed to centers of diversity, namely Australia, India, Africa, and South America. In addition, the relationships among these biogeographical monophyletic groups, substantiated by molecular dating, reflect sequential origins during the breakup of Gondwana. The Australian polystome lineage may have been isolated during the first stages of the breakup, whereas the Indian lineage would have arisen after the complete separation of western and eastern Gondwanan components. Next, polystomes would have codiverged with hyloid sensu stricto and ranoid frog lineages before the completion of South American and African plate separation. Ultimately, they would have undergone an extensive diversification in South America when their ancestral host families diversified. Therefore, the presence of polystome parasites in specific anuran host clades and in discrete geographic areas reveals the importance of biogeographic vicariance in diversification processes and supports the occurrence and radiation of amphibians over ancient and recent geological periods.

7 March 2002 in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OVOlivier Verneau
Olivier Verneau
SBSophie Bentz
Sophie Bentz
NSNeeta Devi Sinnappah
Neeta Devi Sinnappah
LPLouis du Preez
Louis du Preez
IWIan Whittington
Ian Whittington
CCClaude Combes
Claude Combes
The Polystomatidae is the only family within the Monogenea to parasitize sarcopterygians such as the Australian lungfish Neoceratodus poisteri and freshwater tetrapods (lissamphibians and chelonians). We present a phylogeny based on partial 18S rDNA sequences of 26 species of Polystomatidae and three taxon from the infrasubclass Oligonchoinea (= Polyopisthocotylea) obtained from the gills of teleost fishes. The basal position of the polystome from lungfish within the Polystomatidae suggests that the family arose during the evolutionary transition between actinopterygians and sarcopterygians, ca. 425 million years (Myr) ago. The monophyly of the polystomatid lineages from chelonian and lissamphibian hosts, in addition to estimates of the divergence times, indicate that polystomatids from turtles radiated ca. 191 Myr ago, following a switch from an aquatic amniote presumed to be extinct to turtles, which diversified in the Upper Triassic. Within polystomatids from lissamphibians, we observe a polytomy of four lineages, namely caudatan, neobatrachian, pelobatid and pipid polystomatid lineages, which occurred ca. 246 Myr ago according to molecular divergence–time estimates. This suggests that the first polystomatids of amphibians originated during the evolution and diversification of lissamphibian orders and suborders ca. 250 Myr ago. Finally, we report a vicariance event between two major groups of neobatrachian polystomes, which is probably linked to the separation of South America from Africa ca. 100 Myr ago.

1 November 2015 in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LHLaurent Héritier
Laurent Héritier
MBMathieu Badets
Mathieu Badets
LPLouis H. Du Preez
Louis H. Du Preez
MAMartins S.O. Aisien
Martins S.O. Aisien
FLFan Lixian
Fan Lixian
OVOlivier Verneau
Olivier Verneau

13 March 2017 in Biodiversity and Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LHLaurent Héritier
Laurent Héritier
AVAitor Valdeón
Aitor Valdeón
ASAmel Sadaoui
Amel Sadaoui
TGThomas Gendre
Thomas Gendre
SFSébastien Ficheux
Sébastien Ficheux
OVOlivier Verneau
Olivier Verneau