Purpose of Review The rapid spread of virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has turned out to be a global emergency. Symptoms of this viral infection, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), include mild infections of the upper respiratory tract, viral pneumonia, respiratory failure, multiple organ failure and death. Till date, no drugs have been discovered to treat COVID-19 patients, and therefore, a considerable amount of interest has been shown in repurposing the existing drugs. Recent Findings Out of these drugs, chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have demonstrated positive results indicating a potential antiviral role against SARS-CoV-2. Its mechanism of action (MOA) includes the interference in the endocytic pathway, blockade of sialic acid receptors, restriction of pH mediated spike (S) protein cleavage at the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) binding site and prevention of cytokine storm. Unfortunately, its adverse effects like gastrointestinal complications, retinopathy and QT interval prolongation are evident in treated COVID-19 patients. Yet, multiple clinical trials have been employed in several countries to evaluate its ability in turning into a needed drug in this pandemic. Summary This review attempts to summarize the MOA of CQ/HCQ and its side effects. The existing literature hints that till date, the role of CQ/HCQ in COVID-19 may be sceptical, and further studies are warranted for obtaining a therapeutic option that could be effectively used across the world to rise out from this pandemic.

MicroRNA (miR) are a class of small non-coding RNA that are involved in post-transcriptional gene regulation. Altered expression of miR has been associated with several pathological conditions. MicroRNA-124 (miR-124) is an abundantly expressed miR in the brain as well as the thymus, lymph nodes, bone marrow, and peripheral blood mono-nuclear cells. It plays a key role in the regulation of the host immune system. Emerging studies show that dysregulated expression of miR-124 is a hallmark in several cancer types and it has been attributed to the progression of these malignancies. In this review, we present a comprehensive summary of the role of miR-124 as a promising therapeutic gateway in oncology.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are specialized cells that can differentiate into various types of cells. MSCs can be utilized to treat cancer. However, a MSC is considered a double-edged sword, because it can promote tumor progression and support cancer cell growth. Likewise, MSC-derived exosomes (MSC-Exos) carry various intracellular materials and transfer them to other cells. MSC-Exos could also cause tumor progression, including brain cancer, breast cancer, hepatic cancer, lung cancer, and colorectal cancer, and develop resistance against therapies, mainly chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. An MSC-Exo promotes tumor development and causes drug resistance in various cancer types. The mechanisms involved in cancer drug resistance vary depending on the cancer cell heterogeneity and complexity. In this article, we have explained the various biomarkers and mechanisms involved in the tumor and resistance development through MSC-Exos in different cancer types.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive malignant type of brain tumor. Targeting one single intracellular pathway might not alleviate the disease, rather it activates the other molecular pathways that lead to the worsening of the disease condition. Therefore, in this study, we attempted to target both isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and IDH2, which are one of the most commonly mutated proteins in GBM and other cancer types. Here, standard precision and extra precision docking, IFD, MM-GBSA, QikProp, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation were performed to identify the potential dual inhibitor for IDH1 and IDH2 from the enamine database containing 59,161 ligands. Upon docking the ligands with IDH1 (PDB: 6VEI) and IDH2 (PDB: 6VFZ), the top eight ligands were selected, based on the XP Glide score. These ligands produced favourable MMGBSA scores and ADME characteristics. Finally, the top four ligands 12953, 44825, 51295, and 53210 were subjected to MD analysis. Interestingly, 53210 showed maximum interaction with Gln 277 for 99% in IDH1 and Gln 316 for 100% in IDH2, which are the crucial amino acids for the inhibitory function of IDH1 and IDH2 to target GBM. Therefore, the present study attempts to identify the novel molecules which could possess a pan-inhibitory action on both IDH1 and IDH that could be crucial in the management of GBM. Yet further evaluation involving in vitro and in vivo studies is warranted to support the data in our current study.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.