Stephen Robert Connor

Dr. Stephen Robert Connor

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

45Years (1982-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2018 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FKFelicia Marie Knaul
Felicia Marie Knaul
PFPaul E Farmer
Paul E Farmer
EKEric L Krakauer
Eric L Krakauer
LLLiliana De Lima
Liliana De Lima
ABAfsan Bhadelia
Afsan Bhadelia
CZCamilla Zimmerman
Camilla Zimmerman

1 June 2013 in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TLThomas Lynch
Thomas Lynch
SCStephen Robert Connor
Stephen Robert Connor
DCDavid Clark
David Clark

1 February 2017 in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCStephen Robert Connor
Stephen Robert Connor
JDJulia Downing
Julia Downing
JMJoan Marston
Joan Marston

1 March 2007 in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCStephen Robert Connor
Stephen Robert Connor
BPBruce Pyenson
Bruce Pyenson
KFKathryn Fitch
Kathryn Fitch
CSCarol Spence
Carol Spence
KIKosuke Iwasaki
Kosuke Iwasaki

1 April 2022 in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EFEric Finkelstein
Eric Finkelstein
ABAfsan Bhadelia
Afsan Bhadelia
CGCynthia Goh
Cynthia Goh
DBDrishti Baid
Drishti Baid
RSRatna Singh
Ratna Singh
SCStephen Robert Connor
Stephen Robert Connor
Few efforts have attempted to quantify how well countries deliver end-of-life (EOL) care. To score, grade, and rank countries (and Hong Kong and Taiwan) on the quality of EOL care based on assessments from country experts using a novel preference-based scoring algorithm. We fielded a survey to country experts around the world, asking them to assess the performance of their country on 13 key indicators of EOL care. Results were combined with preference weights from caregiver-proxies of recently deceased patients to generate a preference-weighted summary score. The scores were then converted to grades (from A-F) and a ranking was created for all included countries. The final sample included responses from 181 experts representing 81 countries with 2 or more experts reporting. The 6 countries who received the highest assessment scores and a grade of A were United Kingdom, Ireland, Taiwan, Australia, Republic of Korea, and Costa Rica. Only Costa Rica (upper middle) is not a high income country. Not until Uganda (ranked 31st) does a low-income country appear on the ranking. Based on the assessment scores, twenty-one countries received a failing grade, with only two - Czech Republic (66th), and Portugal (75th) - being high income countries. This study provides an example of how a preference-based scoring algorithm and input from key stakeholders can be used to assess EOL health system performance. Results highlight the large disparities in assessments of the quality of EOL care across countries, and especially between the highest income countries and others.

1 June 2007 in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BFBetty Ferrell
Betty Ferrell
SCStephen Robert Connor
Stephen Robert Connor
ACAnne Cordes
Anne Cordes
CDConstance M. Dahlin
Constance M. Dahlin
PFPerry G. Fine
Perry G. Fine
KZKen Zuroski
Ken Zuroski