Although hundreds of different adjuvants have been tried, aluminum-containing adjuvants are by far the most widely used currently. It is worth mentioning that although aluminum-containing adjuvants have been commonly applied in vaccine production, their acting mechanism remains not completely clear. Thus far, researchers have proposed the following mechanisms: (1) depot effect, (2) phagocytosis, (3) activation of pro-inflammatory signaling pathway NLRP3, (4) host cell DNA release, and other mechanisms of action. Having an overview on recent studies to increase our comprehension on the mechanisms by which aluminum-containing adjuvants adsorb antigens and the effects of adsorption on antigen stability and immune response has become a mainstream research trend. Aluminum-containing adjuvants can enhance immune response through a variety of molecular pathways, but there are still significant challenges in designing effective immune-stimulating vaccine delivery systems with aluminum-containing adjuvants. At present, studies on the acting mechanism of aluminum-containing adjuvants mainly focus on aluminum hydroxide adjuvants. This review will take aluminum phosphate as a representative to discuss the immune stimulation mechanism of aluminum phosphate adjuvants and the differences between aluminum phosphate adjuvants and aluminum hydroxide adjuvants, as well as the research progress on the improvement of aluminum phosphate adjuvants (including the improvement of the adjuvant formula, nano-aluminum phosphate adjuvants and a first-grade composite adjuvant containing aluminum phosphate). Based on such related knowledge, determining optimal formulation to develop effective and safe aluminium-containing adjuvants for different vaccines will become more substantiated.

In the current era, our experience is full of pandemic infectious agents that no longer threaten the major local source but the whole globe. One such infectious agent is HPV, a sexually transmitted disease that can cause various clinical disorders, including benign lesions and cervical cancer. Since available vaccines still need further improvements in order to enhance efficacy, our goal was to design a chimeric vaccine against HPV using an immunoinformatics approach. For designing the vaccine, the sequence of HPV was retrieved, and then phylogenetic analysis was performed. Several CTL epitopes, HTL epitopes, and LBL epitopes were all predicted using bioinformatics tools. After checking the antigenicity, allergenicity, and toxicity scores, the best epitopes were selected for vaccine construction, and then physicochemical and immunological properties were analyzed. Subsequently, vaccine 3D structure prediction, refinement, and validation were performed. Molecular docking and dynamics simulation techniques were used to explore the interactions between the Toll-like receptor 2 and the modeled vaccine construct. To ensure the vaccine protein was expressed at a higher level, the construct was computationally cloned into the pET28a (+) plasmid. The molecular docking and simulation results showed that our designed vaccine is stable, of immunogenic quality, and has considerable solubility. Through in silico immune simulation, it was predicted that the designed polypeptide vaccine construct would trigger both humoral and cellular immune responses. The developed vaccine showed significant affinity for the TLR2 receptor molecule. However, additional laboratory research is required to evaluate its safety and efficacy.

A series of novel immunoadjuvant QS-21 analogs were synthesized, and their effects on the in vitro hemolysis of red blood cells were evaluated using QS-21 as a control and hemolytic properties as an index. Our results show that all the QS-21 analogs had lower hemolytic effects than QS-21, and their concentrations exhibited a certain quantitative effect relationship with the hemolysis rate. Notably, saponin compounds L1–L8 produced minimal hemolysis and showed lower hemolytic effects, warranting further investigation.