Background: Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) syndrome is a respiratory sleep disorder characterized by partial or complete episodes of upper airway collapse with reduction or complete cessation of airflow. Although the connection remains debated, several mechanisms such as intermittent hypoxemia, sleep deprivation, hypercapnia disruption of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis have been associated with poor neurocognitive performance. Different treatments have been proposed to treat OSAS patients as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), mandibular advancement devices (MAD), surgery; however, the effect on neurocognitive functions is still debated. This article presents the effect of OSAS treatments on neurocognitive performance by reviewing the literature. Methods: We performed a comprehensive review of the English language over the past 20 years using the following keywords: neurocognitive performance and sleep apnea, neurocognitive improvement and CPAP, OSAS, and cognitive dysfunction. We included in the analysis papers that correlated OSA treatment with neurocognitive performance improvement. All validated tests used to measure different neurocognitive performance improvements were considered. Results: Seventy papers reported neurocognitive Performance improvement in OSA patients after CPAP therapy. Eighty percent of studies found improved executive functions such as verbal fluency or working memory, with partial neural recovery at long-term follow-up. One article compared the effect of MAD, CPAP treatment on cognitive disorders, reporting better improvement of CPAP and MAD than placebo in cognitive function. Conclusions: CPAP treatment seems to improve cognitive defects associated with OSA. Limited studies have evaluated the effects of the other therapies on cognitive function.

Objectives: To evaluate the role of clinical scores assessing the risk of disease severity in patients with clinical suspicion of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA). The hypothesis was tested by applying artificial intelligence (AI) to demonstrate its effectiveness in distinguishing between mild–moderate OSA and severe OSA risk. Methods: A support vector machine model (SVM) was developed from the samples included in the analysis (N = 498), and they were split into 75% for training (N = 373) with the remaining for testing (N = 125). Two diagnostic thresholds were selected for OSA severity: mild to moderate (apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5 events/h and AHI < 30 events/h) and severe (AHI ≥ 30 events/h). The algorithms were trained and tested to predict OSA patient severity. Results: The sensitivity and specificity for the SVM model were 0.93 and 0.80 with an accuracy of 0.86; instead, the logistic regression full mode reported a value of 0.74 and 0.63, respectively, with an accuracy of 0.68. After backward stepwise elimination for features selection, the reduced logistic regression model demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 0.79 and 0.56, respectively, and an accuracy of 0.67. Conclusion: Artificial intelligence could be applied to patients with symptoms related to OSA to identify individuals with a severe OSA risk with clinical-based algorithms in the OSA framework.

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy and sildenafil pharmacological therapy in improving sexual function among patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and erectile dysfunction (ED). Materials and methods: Population: Patients affected by OSA and ED; Intervention: CPAP therapy vs. Comparison: Sildenafil pharmacological therapy; Outcomes: Improvement in erectile function, as measured by the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5) scoring system; Time: A systematic review of the literature from the past 20 years; Study Design: Observational studies comparing erectile function improvements after OSA treatment. Results: A total of eight papers were included in the qualitative summary, involving four hundred fifty-seven patients with ED and OSA. Erectile function improvements were observed in both treatment groups. After sildenafil and CPAP treatment, the mean IIEF-5 domain scores were 37.7 and 27.3, respectively (p < 0.001). Sildenafil 100 mg demonstrated a higher therapeutic impact compared to CPAP treatment. Conclusions: CPAP therapy significantly improved sexual parameters in most studies for OSA patients with ED. The findings suggest that CPAP therapy effectively alleviates erectile dysfunction symptoms, resulting in improved sexual performance in OSA patients. The comparison of the two treatments indicates that sildenafil has a more substantial therapeutic impact on erectile function than CPAP therapy; however, a combined treatment will provide a cumulative effect.

Background/Objective: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is a chronic inflammatory disease with a significant impact on quality of life and is frequently associated, from a pathogenetic perspective, with type 2 inflammation. The introduction of biologic therapies has marked a turning point in the management of severe forms of the disease, offering a valuable treatment option. However, selecting the most suitable biologic agent for a specific patient remains a clinical challenge. Artificial intelligence, and, in particular, ChatGPT, has recently been proposed as a potential tool to support medical decision-making and guide therapeutic choices. To evaluate the concordance between the therapeutic recommendations provided by ChatGPT and those of a multidisciplinary expert board in selecting the most appropriate biologic therapy for CRSwNP patients, based on the analysis of their phenotype and endotype. Methods: A multicenter observational cohort study was conducted. Clinical data from 286 patients with CRSwNP were analyzed. For each case, the therapeutic choice among Dupilumab, Mepolizumab, and Omalizumab was compared between the board and ChatGPT. Concordance rates and Cohen’s Kappa coefficient were calculated. Results: Overall concordance was 59.2%, with a Cohen’s Kappa coefficient of 0.116. Concordance by drug was 62.8% for Dupilumab, 26.5% for Mepolizumab, and 9.1% for Omalizumab. Patients presented with severe clinical profiles, with an average Nasal Polyp Score of 6.22 and an average SNOT-22 score of 64.5. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that, despite its substantial theoretical potential, ChatGPT is currently not a reliable tool for the autonomous selection of biological therapies in patients with CRSwNP. Further studies are necessary to enhance its reliability and integration into clinical practice.

Background: Olfactory recovery plays an important role in improving the quality of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP), and Dupilumab therapy shows promising results. The Nasal Polyp Score (NPS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for olfactory disorders (ODs), and the Sniffin’ Sticks 16-item identification test (SS-I) are three of the main indices of efficacy in CRSwNP treatment. Although mechanical obstruction appears to be a major cause of olfactory disorders in this condition, the three indices can often vary with different trends. Aim: The aim is to assess whether there is a correlation between the sense of smell recovery and the volumetric reduction in polyps and to assess how the reduction in NPS affects the improvement in olfactory symptoms. Methods: An observational monocentric retrospective cohort study was conducted on a sample of 50 patients, enrolled in treatment with Dupilumab for 12 months at the ENT Unit of Rodolico Hospital. We investigated the relationship between NPS changes and olfactory recovery using the Sniffin’ Stick 16-item identification test and the VAS for ODs at baseline and follow-up endpoints (1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month assessments). Results: During the follow-up, according to the data in the literature, the patients showed a faster improvement in terms of SS-I and VAS for ODs than expressed in terms of NPS variation. Conclusions: This study shows that, in patients treated with Dupilumab, there is no strong correlation between the reduction in NPS and the recovery of the sense of smell evaluated by an improvement in the SS-I and VAS for ODs in the 12 months of follow-up, suggesting that, in patients with CRSwNP, the improvement in olfactory symptoms following treatment with Dupilumab is mainly related to its anti-inflammatory effects and not to the reduction in mechanical obstruction caused by nasal polyps.