Simulating Arctic Ocean mesoscale eddies in ocean circulation models presents a great challenge because of their small size. This study employs an unstructured‐mesh ocean‐sea ice model to conduct a decadal‐scale global simulation with a 1‐km Arctic. It provides a basinwide overview of Arctic eddy energetics. Increasing model resolution from 4 to 1 km increases Arctic eddy kinetic energy (EKE) and total kinetic energy (TKE) by about 40% and 15%, respectively. EKE is the highest along main currents over topography slopes, where strong conversion from available potential energy to EKE takes place. It is high in halocline with a maximum typically centered in the depth range of 70–110 m, and in the Atlantic Water layer of the Eurasian Basin as well. The seasonal variability of EKE along the continental slopes of southern Canada and eastern Eurasian basins is similar, stronger in fall and weaker in spring.
25 May 2019 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
The cumulative Greenland freshwater flux anomaly has exceeded 5,000 km3 since the 1990s. The volume of this surplus freshwater is expected to cause substantial freshening in the North Atlantic. Analysis of hydrographic observations in the subpolar seas reveals freshening signals in the 2010s. The sources of this freshening are yet to be determined. In this study, the relationship between the surplus Greenland freshwater flux and this freshening is tested by analyzing the propagation of the Greenland freshwater anomaly and its impact on salinity in the subpolar North Atlantic based on observational data and numerical experiments with and without the Greenland runoff. A passive tracer is continuously released during the simulations at freshwater sources along the coast of Greenland to track the Greenland freshwater anomaly. Tracer budget analysis shows that 44% of the volume of the Greenland freshwater anomaly is retained in the subpolar North Atlantic by the end of the simulation. This volume is sufficient to cause strong freshening in the subpolar seas if it stays in the upper 50–100 m. However, in the model the anomaly is mixed down to several hundred meters of the water column resulting in smaller magnitudes of freshening compared to the observations. Therefore, the simulations suggest that the accelerated Greenland melting would not be sufficient to cause the observed freshening in the subpolar seas and other sources of freshwater have contributed to the freshening. Impacts on salinity in the subpolar seas of the freshwater transport through Fram Strait and precipitation are discussed.
In this study, we investigate eddy dynamics in the northern Greenland Sea and the Fram Strait using AVISO altimetry, spaceborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR), and Finite Element Sea ice‐Ocean Model (FESOM) high‐resolution numerical model data. In the region, eddies are thought to play an important role in the redistribution of the warmer and saltier Atlantic Water between the Arctic Ocean and the areas of deep convection in the central Greenland Sea. We found that eddies detected in AVISO and in SAR form two complementary data sets of large mesoscale eddies (with typical radii of 30–50 km) and of small mesoscale/submesoscale eddies (with typical radii of 1–5 km and not exceeding 30 km), respectively. For large mesoscale eddies, the number of cyclones and anticyclones is approximately the same, while for submesoscale eddies, cyclones are strongly dominating. The limitations and possible biases in each of the data sets are discussed and cross‐validated against FESOM results. It is noted that the most energetic eddies are concentrated along the major currents and in the northern part of the region. Eddy translations follow the mean currents in their overall cyclonic circulation around the northern Greenland Sea. A convergence of the eddies toward the Nordbukta area is detected. On seasonal time scale, a higher number of more intense mesoscale eddies is observed during winter, associated with a quasi‐simultaneous intensification of the mean currents. Model results also show an increase in the number of small eddies in spring‐early summer attributed to the decay of large eddies, while in late autumn, the opposite tendency suggests eddy merger.