Astri Johansen Lundervold

Prof. Astri Johansen Lundervold

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 June 2018 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJeanne E. Savage
Jeanne E. Savage
PJPhilip R. Jansen
Philip R. Jansen
SSSven Stringer
Sven Stringer
KWKyoko Watanabe
Kyoko Watanabe
JBJulien Bryois
Julien Bryois
DPDanielle Posthuma
Danielle Posthuma
Intelligence is highly heritable1 and a major determinant of human health and well-being2. Recent genome-wide meta-analyses have identified 24 genomic loci linked to variation in intelligence3,4,5,6,7, but much about its genetic underpinnings remains to be discovered. Here, we present a large-scale genetic association study of intelligence (n = 269,867), identifying 205 associated genomic loci (190 new) and 1,016 genes (939 new) via positional mapping, expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) mapping, chromatin interaction mapping, and gene-based association analysis. We find enrichment of genetic effects in conserved and coding regions and associations with 146 nonsynonymous exonic variants. Associated genes are strongly expressed in the brain, specifically in striatal medium spiny neurons and hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Gene set analyses implicate pathways related to nervous system development and synaptic structure. We confirm previous strong genetic correlations with multiple health-related outcomes, and Mendelian randomization analysis results suggest protective effects of intelligence for Alzheimer’s disease and ADHD and bidirectional causation with pleiotropic effects for schizophrenia. These results are a major step forward in understanding the neurobiology of cognitive function as well as genetically related neurological and psychiatric disorders.

1 April 2017 in The Lancet Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMartine Hoogman
Martine Hoogman
JBJanita Bralten
Janita Bralten
DHDerrek P Hibar
Derrek P Hibar
MMMaarten Mennes
Maarten Mennes
MZMarcel P Zwiers
Marcel P Zwiers
BFBarbara Franke
Barbara Franke

29 May 2018 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GDGail Davies
Gail Davies
MLMax Lam
Max Lam
SHSarah E Harris
Sarah E Harris
JTJoey W Trampush
Joey W Trampush
MLMichelle Luciano
Michelle Luciano
IDIan Deary
Ian Deary
General cognitive function is a prominent and relatively stable human trait that is associated with many important life outcomes. We combine cognitive and genetic data from the CHARGE and COGENT consortia, and UK Biobank (totalN = 300,486; age 16–102) and find 148 genome-wide significant independent loci (P < 5 × 10−8) associated with general cognitive function. Within the novel genetic loci are variants associated with neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental disorders, physical and psychiatric illnesses, and brain structure. Gene-based analyses find 709 genes associated with general cognitive function. Expression levels across the cortex are associated with general cognitive function. Using polygenic scores, up to 4.3% of variance in general cognitive function is predicted in independent samples. We detect significant genetic overlap between general cognitive function, reaction time, and many health variables including eyesight, hypertension, and longevity. In conclusion we identify novel genetic loci and pathways contributing to the heritability of general cognitive function.

24 September 2019 in Nature Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
K(Karolinska Schizophrenia Project (KaSP)
Karolinska Schizophrenia Project (KaSP)
TKTobias Kaufmann
Tobias Kaufmann
DMDennis van der Meer
Dennis van der Meer
NDNhat Trung Doan
Nhat Trung Doan
ESEmanuel Schwarz
Emanuel Schwarz
LWLars T. Westlye
Lars T. Westlye

1 January 2015 in BMJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMari Hysing
Mari Hysing
SPStåle Pallesen
Ståle Pallesen
KSKjell Morten Stormark
Kjell Morten Stormark
RJReidar Jakobsen
Reidar Jakobsen
ALAstri Johansen Lundervold
Astri Johansen Lundervold
BSBørge Sivertsen
Børge Sivertsen
Objectives Adolescents spend increasingly more time on electronic devices, and sleep deficiency rising in adolescents constitutes a major public health concern. The aim of the present study was to investigate daytime screen use and use of electronic devices before bedtime in relation to sleep. Design A large cross-sectional population-based survey study from 2012, the youth@hordaland study, in Hordaland County in Norway. Setting Cross-sectional general community-based study. Participants 9846 adolescents from three age cohorts aged 16–19. The main independent variables were type and frequency of electronic devices at bedtime and hours of screen-time during leisure time. Outcomes Sleep variables calculated based on self-report including bedtime, rise time, time in bed, sleep duration, sleep onset latency and wake after sleep onset. Results Adolescents spent a large amount of time during the day and at bedtime using electronic devices. Daytime and bedtime use of electronic devices were both related to sleep measures, with an increased risk of short sleep duration, long sleep onset latency and increased sleep deficiency. A dose–response relationship emerged between sleep duration and use of electronic devices, exemplified by the association between PC use and risk of less than 5 h of sleep (OR=2.70, 95% CI 2.14 to 3.39), and comparable lower odds for 7–8 h of sleep (OR=1.64, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.96). Conclusions Use of electronic devices is frequent in adolescence, during the day as well as at bedtime. The results demonstrate a negative relation between use of technology and sleep, suggesting that recommendations on healthy media use could include restrictions on electronic devices.

9 August 2011 in Molecular Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GDG Davies
G Davies
ATA Tenesa
A Tenesa
APA Payton
A Payton
JYJ Yang
J Yang
SHS E Harris
S E Harris
IDIan Deary
Ian Deary
General intelligence is an important human quantitative trait that accounts for much of the variation in diverse cognitive abilities. Individual differences in intelligence are strongly associated with many important life outcomes, including educational and occupational attainments, income, health and lifespan. Data from twin and family studies are consistent with a high heritability of intelligence, but this inference has been controversial. We conducted a genome-wide analysis of 3511 unrelated adults with data on 549 692 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and detailed phenotypes on cognitive traits. We estimate that 40% of the variation in crystallized-type intelligence and 51% of the variation in fluid-type intelligence between individuals is accounted for by linkage disequilibrium between genotyped common SNP markers and unknown causal variants. These estimates provide lower bounds for the narrow-sense heritability of the traits. We partitioned genetic variation on individual chromosomes and found that, on average, longer chromosomes explain more variation. Finally, using just SNP data we predicted ∼1% of the variance of crystallized and fluid cognitive phenotypes in an independent sample (P=0.009 and 0.028, respectively). Our results unequivocally confirm that a substantial proportion of individual differences in human intelligence is due to genetic variation, and are consistent with many genes of small effects underlying the additive genetic influences on intelligence.