Elizabeth Rhiannon Davies

Dr. Elizabeth Rhiannon Davies

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 March 2005 in Journal of Experimental Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PWPeter Wark
Peter Wark
SJSebastian L Johnston
Sebastian L Johnston
FBFabio Bucchieri
Fabio Bucchieri
RPRobert Powell
Robert Powell
SPSarah Puddicombe
Sarah Puddicombe
EDElizabeth Rhiannon Davies
Elizabeth Rhiannon Davies
Rhinoviruses are the major trigger of acute asthma exacerbations and asthmatic subjects are more susceptible to these infections. To investigate the underlying mechanisms of this increased susceptibility, we examined virus replication and innate responses to rhinovirus (RV)-16 infection of primary bronchial epithelial cells from asthmatic and healthy control subjects. Viral RNA expression and late virus release into supernatant was increased 50- and 7-fold, respectively in asthmatic cells compared with healthy controls. Virus infection induced late cell lysis in asthmatic cells but not in normal cells. Examination of the early cellular response to infection revealed impairment of virus induced caspase 3/7 activity and of apoptotic responses in the asthmatic cultures. Inhibition of apoptosis in normal cultures resulted in enhanced viral yield, comparable to that seen in infected asthmatic cultures. Examination of early innate immune responses revealed profound impairment of virus-induced interferon-β mRNA expression in asthmatic cultures and they produced >2.5 times less interferon-β protein. In infected asthmatic cells, exogenous interferon-β induced apoptosis and reduced virus replication, demonstrating a causal link between deficient interferon-β, impaired apoptosis and increased virus replication. These data suggest a novel use for type I interferons in the treatment or prevention of virus-induced asthma exacerbations.

13 August 2006 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MCMarco Contoli
Marco Contoli
SMSimon D Message
Simon D Message
VLVasile Laza-Stanca
Vasile Laza-Stanca
MEMichael R Edwards
Michael R Edwards
PWPeter Wark
Peter Wark
SJSebastian L Johnston
Sebastian L Johnston

1 September 2011 in Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CXChang Xiao
Chang Xiao
SPSarah M. Puddicombe
Sarah M. Puddicombe
SFSarah Field
Sarah Field
JHJoel Haywood
Joel Haywood
VBVictoria Broughton-Head
Victoria Broughton-Head
EDElizabeth Rhiannon Davies
Elizabeth Rhiannon Davies

17 November 2013 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KBKlaus Bønnelykke
Klaus Bønnelykke
PSPatrick Sleiman
Patrick Sleiman
KNKasper Nielsen
Kasper Nielsen
EKEskil Kreiner-Møller
Eskil Kreiner-Møller
JMJosep M Mercader
Josep M Mercader
HBHans Bisgaard
Hans Bisgaard

26 May 2011 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CGChristopher L. Grainge
Christopher L. Grainge
LLLaurie C.K. Lau
Laurie C.K. Lau
JWJonathon A. Ward
Jonathon A. Ward
VDValdeep Dulay
Valdeep Dulay
GLGemma Lahiff
Gemma Lahiff
PHPeter H Howarth
Peter H Howarth
Asthma is characterized pathologically by structural changes in the airway, termed airway remodeling. These changes are associated with worse long-term clinical outcomes and have been attributed to eosinophilic inflammation. In vitro studies indicate, however, that the compressive mechanical forces that arise during bronchoconstriction may induce remodeling independently of inflammation. We evaluated the influence of repeated experimentally induced bronchoconstriction on airway structural changes in patients with asthma. We randomly assigned 48 subjects with asthma to one of four inhalation challenge protocols involving a series of three challenges with one type of inhaled agent presented at 48-hour intervals. The two active challenges were with either a dust-mite allergen (which causes bronchoconstriction and eosinophilic inflammation) or methacholine (which causes bronchoconstriction without eosinophilic inflammation); the two control challenges (neither of which causes bronchoconstriction) were either saline alone or albuterol followed by methacholine (to control for nonbronchoconstrictor effects of methacholine). Bronchial-biopsy specimens were obtained before and 4 days after completion of the challenges. Allergen and methacholine immediately induced similar levels of bronchoconstriction. Eosinophilic inflammation of the airways increased only in the allergen group, whereas both the allergen and the methacholine groups had significant airway remodeling not seen in the two control groups. Subepithelial collagen-band thickness increased by a median of 2.17 μm in the allergen group (interquartile range [IQR], 0.70 to 3.67) and 1.94 μm in the methacholine group (IQR, 0.37 to 3.24) (P<0.001 for the comparison of the two challenge groups with the two control groups); periodic acid–Schiff staining of epithelium (mucus glands) also increased, by a median of 2.17 percentage points in the allergen group (IQR, 1.03 to 4.77) and 2.13 percentage points in the methacholine group (IQR, 1.14 to 7.96) (P=0.003 for the comparison with controls). There were no significant differences between the allergen and methacholine groups. Bronchoconstriction without additional inflammation induces airway remodeling in patients with asthma. These findings have potential implications for management.

1 February 2000 in Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHStephen T. Holgate
Stephen T. Holgate
EDElizabeth Rhiannon Davies
Elizabeth Rhiannon Davies
PLPeter M. Lackie
Peter M. Lackie
SWSusan J. Wilson
Susan J. Wilson
SPSarah M. Puddicombe
Sarah M. Puddicombe
JLJames L. Lordan
James L. Lordan