Naveen Premnath

Dr. Naveen Premnath

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 June 2025 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAmbarish Pandey
Ambarish Pandey
TTToby Thomas
Toby Thomas
YJYuanyuan Ji
Yuanyuan Ji
BKBenjamin Kroger
Benjamin Kroger
PCPeter Carlsgaard
Peter Carlsgaard
SCStephen S. Chung
Stephen S. Chung

31 May 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NPNaveen Premnath
Naveen Premnath
YMYazan F Madanat
Yazan F Madanat
The word Leukemia was coined nearly 200 years ago by Rudolf Virchow. Once a death sentence, Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is now a treatable condition. The introduction of “7 + 3” chemotherapy, originally reported from the Roswell Park Memorial institute in Buffalo, New York, in 1973, changed the treatment paradigm for AML. About twenty-seven years later, FDA approved the first targeted agent, gemtuzumab, to be added to this backbone. During the last seven years, we have had ten new drugs approved for the management of patients with AML. Work by many dedicated scientists led to AML achieving the elite status of being the first cancer to have the whole genome sequenced using next-generation sequencing. In the year 2022, we witnessed the introduction of new classification systems for AML by the international consensus classification and the world health organization, both emphasizing molecular classification of the disease. In addition, the introduction of agents such as venetoclax and targeted therapies have changed the treatment paradigm in older patients ineligible for intensive therapy. In this review, we cover the rationale and evidence behind these regimens and provide insights into the newer agents.

20 December 2022 in Leukemia Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NPNaveen Premnath
Naveen Premnath
SCStephen S. Chung
Stephen S. Chung
OWOlga K. Weinberg
Olga K. Weinberg
RIRuth Ikpefan
Ruth Ikpefan
MPMohak Pandey
Mohak Pandey
YMYazan F. Madanat
Yazan F. Madanat

2 May 2019 in Nutrition and Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TBTimothy J Brown
Timothy J Brown
DMDhruvika Mukhija
Dhruvika Mukhija
NPNaveen Premnath
Naveen Premnath
AVAnand Venkatraman
Anand Venkatraman
SNSajan Jiv Singh Nagpal
Sajan Jiv Singh Nagpal
AGArjun Gupta
Arjun Gupta
Aim: The neutropenic diet is commonly prescribed to cancer patients with neutropenia with the goal of reducing infections. However, multiple randomized trials have proved no benefit with neutropenic diets compared to less restricted diets with regards to reducing infectious risk. We aimed to ascertain if top cancer centers recommended for or against the use of neutropenic diets on their official websites. Methods: We reviewed the websites of the top 20 hospitals in the 2017 US News Best Hospitals for Cancer©, and ascertained recommendations for neutropenic diet (for, against, equivocal, or not addressed). Results: Seven websites (35%) made recommendations for, four (20%) against, and nine (45%) did not address the neutropenic diet. Only five (25%) backed any of their recommendations with evidence (four against, one for), including two (10%) links to abstracts (both against), whereas seven mentioned the FDA safe food handling guidelines (non-exclusive). Type of recommendation made (for or against) did not depend on US News rank (top vs bottom 10; p = 1.00.). Conclusion: The neutropenic diet continues to be recommended on many (35%) websites of top US cancer centers, despite strong evidence against its use. The website content of major US cancer centers should be updated to better guide patients regarding neutropenic diets.

29 May 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NPNaveen Premnath
Naveen Premnath
YMYazan F Madanat
Yazan F Madanat
Acute Myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clinically heterogeneous disease with a 5-year overall survival of 32% between 2012 to 2018. The above number severely dwindles with age and adverse risk of disease, presenting opportunities for new drug development and is an area of dire unmet need. Basic science and clinical investigators across the world have been working on many new and old molecule formulations and combination strategies to improve outcomes in this disease. In this review, we discuss select promising novel agents in various stages of clinical development for patients with AML.

1 March 2018 in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGArjun Gupta
Arjun Gupta
ADAvash Das
Avash Das
RTRaseen Tariq
Raseen Tariq
NBNizar Bhulani
Nizar Bhulani
NPNaveen Premnath
Naveen Premnath
MBMuhammad Shaalan Beg
Muhammad Shaalan Beg
Background: There has been an overall decline in intensive care unit mortality over the past 2 decades, including in patients undergoing intubation and mechanical ventilation (MV). Whether this decline extends to patients with metastatic cancer remains unknown. We analyzed the outcomes of patients with metastatic cancer undergoing intubation/MV using the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) database from 2001 to 2010. Methods: Diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify patients with metastatic cancer who underwent intubation/MV. Demographics, diagnoses, length of stay (LOS), and discharge information were abstracted. Multivariate linear and logistic regression models with weighted analysis were conducted to study trends in outcomes. Results: During the 10-year study period, 200,350 patients with metastatic cancer and who underwent intubation/MV were identified; the mean age was 65.3 years and 46.2% were men. There was an increase in the total number of patients with metastatic cancer who underwent intubation/MV during the study period, from 36,881 in 2001-2002 to 51,003 in 2009-2010 (P<.001). The overall inpatient mortality rate was 57.3%, discharge to a care facility ( DTCF) rate was 40.9% among patients alive at discharge, and mean LOS was 11.1 days. No significant trends were seen in rates of mortality, DTCF, or LOS from 2001 to 2010. Conclusions: In this national database, there was an increase in the number of patients with metastatic cancer who underwent intubation/MV. These patients had high rates of inpatient mortality and DTCF, which did not improve during the study period. Therefore, novel solutions are required to improve outcomes for these patients.