Kelly Goodwin

Dr. Kelly Goodwin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2017 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LTLuke R. Thompson
Luke R. Thompson
JSJon G. Sanders
Jon G. Sanders
DMDaniel McDonald
Daniel McDonald
AAAmnon Amir
Amnon Amir
JLJoshua Ladau
Joshua Ladau
RKRob Knight
Rob Knight
Our growing awareness of the microbial world’s importance and diversity contrasts starkly with our limited understanding of its fundamental structure. Despite recent advances in DNA sequencing, a lack of standardized protocols and common analytical frameworks impedes comparisons among studies, hindering the development of global inferences about microbial life on Earth. Here we present a meta-analysis of microbial community samples collected by hundreds of researchers for the Earth Microbiome Project. Coordinated protocols and new analytical methods, particularly the use of exact sequences instead of clustered operational taxonomic units, enable bacterial and archaeal ribosomal RNA gene sequences to be followed across multiple studies and allow us to explore patterns of diversity at an unprecedented scale. The result is both a reference database giving global context to DNA sequence data and a framework for incorporating data from future studies, fostering increasingly complete characterization of Earth’s microbial diversity.

19 June 2015 in GigaScience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAnna Kopf
Anna Kopf
MBMesude Bicak
Mesude Bicak
RKRenzo Kottmann
Renzo Kottmann
JSJulia Schnetzer
Julia Schnetzer
IKIvaylo Kostadinov
Ivaylo Kostadinov
FGFrank Oliver Glöckner
Frank Oliver Glöckner
Ocean Sampling Day was initiated by the EU-funded Micro B3 (Marine Microbial Biodiversity, Bioinformatics, Biotechnology) project to obtain a snapsho

23 July 2019 in Frontiers in Marine Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GCGabrielle Canonico
Gabrielle Canonico
PBPier Luigi Buttigieg
Pier Luigi Buttigieg
EMEnrique Montes
Enrique Montes
FMFrank E. Muller-Karger
Frank E. Muller-Karger
CSCarol Stepien
Carol Stepien
BMBramley Murton
Bramley Murton
The diversity of life in the sea is critical to the health of ocean ecosystems that support living resources and therefore essential to the economic, nutritional, recreational, and health needs of billions of people. Yet there is evidence that the biodiversity of many marine habitats is being altered in response to a changing climate and human activity. Understanding this change, and forecasting where changes are likely to occur, requires monitoring of organism diversity, distribution, abundance, and health. It requires a minimum of measurements including productivity and ecosystem function, species composition, allelic diversity, and genetic expression. These observations need to be complemented with metrics of environmental change and socio-economic drivers. However, existing global ocean observing infrastructure and programs often do not explicitly consider observations of marine biodiversity and associated processes. Much effort has focused on physical, chemical and some biogeochemical measurements. Broad partnerships, shared approaches, and best practices are now being organized to implement an integrated observing system that serves information to resource managers and decision-makers, scientists and educators, from local to global scales. This integrated observing system of ocean life is now possible due to recent developments among satellite, airborne, and in situ sensors in conjunction with increases in information system capability and capacity, along with an improved understanding of marine processes represented in new physical, biogeochemical, and biological models.

16 July 2019 in Frontiers in Marine Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KYKevan M. Yamahara
Kevan M. Yamahara
CPChristina M. Preston
Christina M. Preston
JBJames Birch
James Birch
KWKristine Walz
Kristine Walz
RMRoman Marin
Roman Marin
CSChristopher Scholin
Christopher Scholin
Environmental DNA (eDNA) can be used to identify macroorganisms and describe biodiversity, and thus has promise to supplement biological monitoring in marine ecosystems. Despite this promise, scaling sample acquisition to the spatial and temporal scales needed for effective monitoring would require prohibitively large investments in time and human resources. To address this challenge, we evaluated the efficacy of an autonomous eDNA sampling system and compare results obtained to traditional eDNA sampling methods. The autonomous sampling instrument consisted of the Environmental Sample Processor (ESP) coupled to an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV). We tested equivalency between the ESP and traditional eDNA sampling techniques by comparing the quantification of eDNA across a broad range of taxa, from microbes (SAR11), phytoplankton (Pseudo-nitzschia spp.), and invertebrates (krill: Euphausia pacifica) to vertebrates (anchovy: Engraulis mordax). No significant differences in eDNA densities were observed between the two sample collection and filtration methods. eDNA filters collected by the ESP were preserved and stable for 21 days, the typical deployment length of the instrumentation. Finally, we demonstrated the unique capabilities of an autonomous, mobile ESP during a deployment near Monterey Bay, CA, by remotely and repeatedly sampling a water mass over 12 h. The development of a mobile ESP demonstrates the promise of utilizing eDNA measurements to observe complex biological processes in the ocean absent a human presence.

22 December 1992 in Limnology and Oceanography
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSteven L. Manley
Steven L. Manley
KGKelly Goodwin
Kelly Goodwin
WNWheeler J. North
Wheeler J. North
Production rates of bromoform (CHBr3), methylene bromide (CH2Br2), and methyl iodide (CH3I) were measured in the laboratory for 11 species of marine macroalgae. Production rates of the volatile bromomethanes extrapolated to a global scale suggest that marine macroalgae produce 2 × 1011 g Br yr−1(1 × 109 mol Br yr−1), 98% of which is bromoform. Laminarians (kelps) produce 61% of this organic Br. These calculations suggest that marine macroalgae are important in the biogeochemical cycling of Br. Seawater concentrations of CHBr3, CH2Br2, and CH3I were determined from various southern California coastal locales. High concentrations were measured in seawater from the canopy and the bottom of a dense bed of Macrocystis as compared to other sites. Surface seawater concentrations of these halomethanes showed a strong cross‐shore gradient with the highest concentration in the kelp canopy and the lowest at 5 km offshore. Seawater adjacent to decaying macroalgae on the bottom of a submarine canyon was not enriched in halomethanes relative to surface water. Water exiting a productive estuary was enriched only with CH2Br2, although two algal species that are abundant there (Ulva and Enteromorpha) showed high laboratory production rates of both CHBr3 and CH2Br2.

1 May 2011 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EVEmily J. Viau
Emily J. Viau
KGKelly Goodwin
Kelly Goodwin
KYKevan M. Yamahara
Kevan M. Yamahara
BLBlythe A. Layton
Blythe A. Layton
LSLauren M. Sassoubre
Lauren M. Sassoubre
ABAlexandria B. Boehm
Alexandria B. Boehm