Context: Carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning is the most common form of accidental lethal poisoning and is associated with a risk of brain damage in survivors. Objective: The goal of this study was to examine whether Tau protein or S100B protein may be used as a biomarker for acute brain dysfunction. Materials and methods: The determination of Tau and S100B proteins was performed in serum samples collected from 27 CO-poisoned patients and 12 healthy volunteers. Results: The level of Tau protein in the serum of patients (444 ± 227 ng L⁻¹) differed significantly compared with those in the healthy controls (240 ± 61 ng L⁻¹) and correlated with the level of carboxyhemoglobin. A higher concentration of Tau protein was found in patients who had lost consciousness during CO exposure. The concentration of S100B in the serum of CO-poisoned subjects (0.08 ± 0.03 µg L⁻¹) was not statistically different from values obtained for the controls (0.07 ± 0.02 µg L⁻¹). Conclusion: CO poisoning appears to be associated with an elevated level of Tau and S100B proteins in the serum of patients who had suffered a loss of consciousness. The study has shown that Tau protein is a more sensitive biomarker than S100B protein for the earlier stage of neurotoxic effects of CO intoxication.

In conventional clinical toxicology practice, the blood level of carboxyhemoglobin is a biomarker of carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning but does not correspond to the complete clinical picture and the severity of the poisoning. Taking into account articles suggesting the relationship between oxidative stress parameters and CO poisoning, it seems reasonable to consider this topic more broadly, including experimental biochemical data (oxidative stress parameters) and patients poisoned with CO. This article aimed to critically assess oxidative-stress-related parameters as potential biomarkers to evaluate the severity of CO poisoning and their possible role in the decision to treat. The critically set parameters were antioxidative, including catalase, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl, glutathione, thiol and carbonyl groups. Our preliminary studies involved patients (n = 82) admitted to the Toxicology Clinical Department of the University Hospital of Jagiellonian University Medical College (Kraków, Poland) during 2015–2020. The poisoning was diagnosed based on medical history, clinical symptoms, and carboxyhemoglobin blood level. Blood samples for carboxyhemoglobin and antioxidative parameters were collected immediately after admission to the emergency department. To evaluate the severity of the poisoning, the Pach scale was applied. The final analysis included a significant decrease in catalase activity and a reduction in glutathione level in all poisoned patients based on the severity of the Pach scale: I°–III° compared to the control group. It follows from the experimental data that the poisoned patients had a significant increase in level due to thiol groups and the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl radical, with no significant differences according to the severity of poisoning. The catalase-to-glutathione and thiol-to-glutathione ratios showed the most important differences between the poisoned patients and the control group, with a significant increase in the poisoned group. The ratios did not differentiate the severity of the poisoning. The carbonyl level was highest in the control group compared to the poisoned group but was not statistically significant. Our critical assessment shows that using oxidative-stress-related parameters to evaluate the severity of CO poisoning, the outcome, and treatment options is challenging.

Background/Objectives: Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) lacks widely adopted biomarkers that reflect disease activity and severity. High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), a damage-associated molecular pattern, has been implicated in ALD pathogenesis. We evaluated the detectability of circulating HMGB1 in patients with ALD during active alcohol use and examined clinical associations. Methods: In this observational study, we enrolled hospitalized adults with ongoing ethanol use between 1 November 2023, and 31 December 2024. Controls had no history of excessive alcohol consumption and normal liver biochemistry. Clinical features, laboratory tests, and severity scores (including MELD, MELD-Na, and CLIF-C AD) were recorded. Serum HMGB1 was measured by ELISA; values ≥ 0.08 ng/mL were considered detectable. Results: The cohort included 68 participants (58 with ALD and 10 controls); 29 patients had cirrhosis. HMGB1 was detectable in 32 measurements (42%), with a median concentration of 4.6 ng/mL (IQR, 0.78–10.6; range, 0.08–140.6). Detectable HMGB1 was more frequent in ALD than in controls (47% vs. 11%). Compared with HMGB1-negative patients, HMGB1-positive patients had higher total bilirubin and creatinine levels, prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time, higher white cell counts, and lower serum sodium. Liver enzyme activities and INR did not differ meaningfully by HMGB1 status. MELD, MELD-Na, and CLIF-C AD scores were higher in HMGB1-positive patients. Admission ethanol levels were higher in HMGB1-negative patients. Mortality and readmission did not differ by HMGB1 status. Conclusions: Detectable circulating HMGB1 is present in a subset of patients with ALD and is associated with greater liver disease severity.