Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a major change in the last decade in terms of survival and prognosis due to the introduction of new drugs in the last 10 years. One of the drugs with the most promising preliminary results in NSCLC are PARP inhibitors (iPARPs), whose clinical trials have very heterogeneous results. The use of iPARPs in NSCLC may lead to increased survival in several selected patients, and their use may become a standard in the coming years. However, there is currently controversy about the efficacy and safety of these drugs in NSCLC. Therefore, future studies are needed to evaluate their role in these tumours. The aim of this review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iPARPs in the treatment of NSCLC. Methods: We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis using the different clinical trials (PubMed, COCHRANE, Science Direct, EMBASE and the clinical trial registry) that evaluated the efficacy and safety of iPARP in NSCLC by PRISMA criteria. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the efficacy of iPARPs in the treatment of NSCLC through overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS). Two authors independently reviewed the articles and abstracts (A.O.H. and J.R.R.), with subsequent confirmation by a third independent reviewer (E.B.M.). The heterogeneity of the included studies in the meta-analysis was assessed by using the I² statistic. Results: A total of 14 articles were included for analysis (2,651 patients). A total of 1,503 patients were randomised in iPARP arms and 1,148 patients were included in control arms. Three clinical trials were conducted in localised or locally advanced NSCLC and 11 in advanced or metastatic stages. The global OS of the meta-analysis showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74–0.97] with a heterogeneity (I²) of 0% (P=0.84). PFS showed a HR of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.74–1.17) with an I²=51% (P=0.07). The overall adverse event rate (grade 1–5) was similar in both iPARP and placebo arms. Conclusions: iPARPs are a future promising in the treatment of NSCLC in terms of efficacy and safety. Proper patient selection [homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) positive] is key for future clinical trials. The studies conducted to date open a new approach for a novel treatment modality in NSCLC.

Introduction: Immunotherapy represents a key pillar of cancer treatments, with high response rates and long survival. Its use is increasing, mainly at the expense of the geriatric population due to the ageing of this population. However, despite its benefit, its safety in certain areas such as cardiotoxicity is largely unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the safety of immunotherapy in elderly patients using real-world data. Methods: This is an ambispective study of patients ≥ 70 years old with solid tumours who were treated with immunotherapy at the University Hospital of Salamanca. Cardiotoxicity was assessed using the CTCAEv5.0 criteria. Results: In total, 195 patients were included (76.9% male and 23.1% female), with a mean age of 75 years [70–93]. The percentage of patients with cardiotoxicity was 1.54%; 1.35% of patients with previous heart disease were diagnosed with cardiotoxicity, and 1.65% of those without previous heart disease were diagnosed with cardiotoxicity. The median time from the initiation of treatment until the cardiac event was 45 days [14–96]. The most frequent toxicity was myocarditis in 66.7% of patients, followed by arrhythmias in 33.3% of patients. Conclusions: Immunotherapy is shown to be a safe treatment in elderly cancer patients in terms of cardiotoxicity. The event rate shows no difference between patients with or without cardiac comorbidity.

In recent years, non-small cell lung cancer treatment has been revolutionized. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and our improved understanding of its alterations have driven new diagnostic strategies. Liquid biopsies have emerged as a useful tool in these contexts, showing potential utility in early diagnosis combined with low-dose CT scans, as well as potential in monitoring treatment response and predicting the development of patients. We studied the circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) of 38 EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients at diagnosis in different moments of their disease by liquid biopsy techniques. Our results show that mean overall survival was significantly lower when a liquid biopsy was positive for the detection of EGFR mutations compared with wild-type patients in their liquid biopsy in both univariate (29 ± 4 vs. 104 ± 19 months; p = 0.004) and multivariate analysis (p = 0.008). Taking this into consideration, liquid biopsies could be key to improving the control of this disease.

Background/Objectives: Recent advances in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have shifted from conventional chemotherapy to targeted therapies aimed at specific genetic mutations, particularly in the adenocarcinoma subtype. These therapies have improved overall survival and quality of life. However, some patients still face barriers to accessing these treatments due to challenges in diagnosing advanced-stage NSCLC. Limited tumor cellularity in small biopsies and cytological samples hinders the ability to perform further molecular analyses. Additionally, the increasing number of genetic alterations requiring testing complicates the diagnostic process. To overcome this challenge, we propose combining endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) with next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry for PD-L1. Methods: A total of 120 EBUS-TBNA samples were consecutively collected during the first year of integrating NGS at a reference hospital in Castilla y León, Spain. Depending on the histology and patient characteristics, a total of 67 NGS analyses and 116 PD-L1 determinations were performed. Results: The cytological sample obtained in these cases successfully achieved the triple objective proposed by the NCCN for lung cancer (diagnosis, staging, and molecular analysis in a single procedure) in 97% of instances. Conclusions: Our study highlights the effectiveness of EBUS-TBNA as a comprehensive, cost-effective, and safe diagnostic tool for NSCLC, successfully achieving the triple objective of diagnosis, staging, and molecular analysis in 97% of cases. The procedure consistently provided high-quality samples for NGS and PD-L1 testing, with minimal complications, reinforcing its value as a reliable approach for optimizing personalized treatment strategies.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is one of the most aggressive tumors. Its diagnosis is usually made in locally advanced or metastatic disease and survival is less than one year. The most frequent sites of metastatic involvement are the liver, peritoneum and lungs. Other organs such as the bones or the brain may be affected to a lesser extent. Cutaneous involvement of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is extremely rare with less than 150 cases reported in the literature since 1960. Most cases with cutaneous involvement involve the periumbilical region, in a lesion known as "Sister Mary Joseph’s Node". Scalp metastases are very rare and their diagnosis suggests advanced disease and the prognosis will be dismal. It is very important to perform a complete physical examination and a global anamnesis to guide the request for diagnostic tests. Once the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma has been made, a global assessment will be necessary, involving different medical specialists, nurses, psychologists and social workers among others. In many cases, supportive care is the mainstay of treatment.

Objective: Physical exercise is an effective supportive strategy in oncology, yet its implementation remains limited, particularly in patients with metastatic breast cancer. This prospective pilot program aimed to evaluate the effects of a 12-week supervised multicomponent exercise program on quality of life, functional capacity, and biological parameters in women undergoing treatment for breast cancer. Methods: Prospective single-arm pilot program. In total, 44 women with early or metastatic breast cancer were enrolled; 29 completed the full intervention and assessments. The program consisted of supervised aerobic, resistance, mobility, and neuromuscular training three times per week. Quality of life was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Strength, body composition, functional mobility (Functional Movement Screen, FMS), 6 min walk test (6MWT), and laboratory markers (RDW, HDL, and cholesterol profile) were evaluated pre- and post-intervention. Results: Significant improvements were observed in global quality of life (+19.5%, p = 0.002), physical function (p = 0.006), emotional function (p = 0.003), and fatigue reduction (p = 0.007). The FMS total score increased significantly (p = 0.001), and 6MWT distance improved by 110 m (p < 0.001). Biochemical analyses showed a significant reduction in RDW (p = 0.005), a pro-inflammatory marker, and an increase in HDL cholesterol (p = 0.007). The intervention was well tolerated, with no exercise-related serious adverse events and high adherence to the supervised program. Conclusions: A 12-week supervised exercise program is feasible and beneficial for women with breast cancer, including those with metastatic disease. It is associated with improvements in quality of life, functional mobility, and selected markers of systemic inflammation. These findings should be considered exploratory and support the integration of structured exercise into routine oncologic care, pending confirmation in larger controlled studies.