SR proteins, named for their multiple arginine/serine (RS) dipeptide repeats, are critical components of the spliceosome, influencing both constitutive and alternative splicing of pre-mRNA. SR protein function is regulated through phosphorylation of their RS domains by multiple kinases, including a family of evolutionarily conserved SR protein-specific kinases (SRPKs). The SRPK family of kinases is unique in that they are capable of phosphorylating repetitive RS domains with remarkable specificity and efficiency. Here, we carried out kinetic experiments specially developed to investigate how SRPK1 phosphorylates the model human SR protein, ASF/SF2. By using the start–trap strategy, we monitored the progress curve for ASF/SF2 phosphorylation in the absence and presence of an inhibitor peptide directed at the active site of SRPK1. ASF/SF2 modification is not altered when the inhibitor peptide (trap) is added with ATP (start). However, when the trap is added first and allowed to incubate for a specific delay time, the decrease in phosphate content of the enzyme–substrate complex follows a simple exponential decline corresponding to the release rate of SRPK1. These data demonstrate that SRPK1 phosphorylates a specific region within the RS domain of ASF/SF2 by using a fully processive catalytic mechanism, in which the splicing factor remains “locked” onto SRPK1 during RS domain modification.

Serine-arginine (SR) proteins are essential splicing factors containing a canonical RNA recognition motif (RRM), sometimes followed by a pseudo-RRM, and a C-terminal arginine/serine-rich (RS) domain that undergoes multisite phosphorylation. Phosphorylation regulates the localization and activity of SR proteins, and thus may provide insight into their differential biological roles. The phosphorylation mechanism of the prototypic SRSF1 by serine-arginine protein kinase 1 (SRPK1) has been well studied but little is known about the phosphorylation of other SR protein members. In the present study, interaction and kinetic assays unveiled how SRSF1 and the single RRM-containing SRSF3 are phosphorylated by SRPK2, another member of the SRPK family. We showed a conserved SRPK-specific substrate-docking groove in SRPK2 impacts the binding and phosphorylation of both SR proteins, and the localization of SRSF3. We identified a non-conserved residue within the groove that affects the kinase processivity. We demonstrated that, in contrast to SRSF1, for which SRPK-mediated phosphorylation is confined to the N-terminal region of the RS domain, SRSF3 phosphorylation sites are spread throughout its entire RS domain in vitro. Despite this, SRSF3 appears to be hypophosphorylated in cells at steady state. Our results suggest that the absence of a pseudo-RRM renders the single RRM-containing SRSF3 more susceptible to dephosphorylation by phosphatase. These findings suggest the single RRM- and two RRMs-containing SR proteins represent two subclasses of phosphoproteins which phosphorylation statuses are maintained by unique mechanisms, and pose new directions to explore the distinct roles of SR proteins in vivo.