Carsten Müller

Prof. Dr. Carsten Müller

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 October 2012 in BMC Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMichaela Döring
Michaela Döring
Carsten MüllerCarsten Müller
Carsten Müller
PJPascal-David Johann
Pascal-David Johann
AEAnnika Erbacher
Annika Erbacher
AKAstrid Kimmig
Astrid Kimmig
IMIngo Müller
Ingo Müller
Pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are at high risk of acquiring fungal infections. Antifungal prophylaxis shortly after transplantation is therefore indicated, but data for pediatric patients under 12 years of age are scarce. To address this issue, we retrospectively assessed the safety, feasibility, and initial efficacy of prophylactic posaconazole in children.

8 June 2020 in Annals of Hematology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJannik Stemler
Jannik Stemler
PKPhilipp Koehler
Philipp Koehler
CMChristian Maurer
Christian Maurer
Carsten MüllerCarsten Müller
Carsten Müller
OCOliver A. Cornely
Oliver A. Cornely
With the advent of new targeted drugs in hematology and oncology patient prognosis is improved. Combination with antifungal prophylaxis challenges clinicians due to pharmacological profiles prone to drug–drug interactions (DDI). Midostaurin is a novel agent for FLT3-TKD/-ITDmut-acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and metabolized via cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). Posaconazole is a standard of care antifungal agent used for prophylaxis during induction treatment of AML and a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. Concomitant administration of both drugs leads to elevated midostaurin exposure. Both drugs improve overall survival at low numbers needed to treat. The impact of CYP3A4-related DDI remains to be determined. Severe adverse events have been observed; however, it remains unclear if they can be directly linked to DDI. The lack of prospective clinical studies assessing incidence of invasive fungal infections and clinical impact of DDI contributes to neglecting live-saving antifungal prophylaxis. Management strategies to combine both drugs have been proposed, but evidence on which approach to use is scarce. In this review, we discuss several approaches in the specific clinical setting of concomitant administration of midostaurin and posaconazole and give examples from everyday clinical practice. Therapeutic drug monitoring will become increasingly important to individualize and personalize antineoplastic concomitant and antifungal treatment in the context of DDI. Pharmaceutical companies addressing the issue in clinical trials may take a pioneer role in this field. Other recently developed and approved drugs for the treatment of AML likely inhere potential of DDI marking a foreseeable issue in future treatment of this life-threatening disease.

6 September 2006 in Mycoses
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Carsten MüllerCarsten Müller
Carsten Müller
MAMargit Arndt
Margit Arndt
CQChristian Queckenberg
Christian Queckenberg
OCOliver A. Cornely
Oliver A. Cornely
MTMartin Theisohn
Martin Theisohn

1 December 2014 in Journal of Chromatography B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NNN.S. Nosseir
N.S. Nosseir
GMG. Michels
G. Michels
PBP. Binder
P. Binder
MWM.H.J. Wiesen
M.H.J. Wiesen
Carsten MüllerCarsten Müller
Carsten Müller

28 January 2006 in European Journal of Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Carsten MüllerCarsten Müller
Carsten Müller
WKWolf Kremer
Wolf Kremer
SHSteffi Harlfinger
Steffi Harlfinger
ODOxana Doroshyenko
Oxana Doroshyenko
AJAlexander Jetter
Alexander Jetter
MTMartin Theisohn
Martin Theisohn

14 September 2018 in Journal of Intensive Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RNRichard J. Nies
Richard J. Nies
Carsten MüllerCarsten Müller
Carsten Müller
RPRoman Pfister
Roman Pfister
PBPhilipp S. Binder
Philipp S. Binder
NNNicole Nosseir
Nicole Nosseir
GMGuido Michels
Guido Michels
Analgosedation is a cornerstone therapy for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units (ICU). To avoid inadequate sedation and its complications, monitoring of analgosedation is of great importance. The aim of this study was to investigate whether monitoring of analgosedative drug concentrations (midazolam and sufentanil) might be beneficial to optimize analgosedation and whether drug serum concentrations correlate with the results of subjective (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale [RASS]/Ramsay Sedation Scale) and objective (bispectral (BIS) index) monitoring procedures. Forty-nine intubated, ventilated, and analgosedated critically ill patients treated in ICU were clinically evaluated concerning the depth of sedation using RASS Score, Ramsay Score, and BIS index twice a day. Serum concentrations of midazolam and sufentanil were determined in blood samples drawn at the same time. Clinical and laboratory data were statistically analyzed for correlations using the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient rho (ρ). Average age of the population was 57.8 ± 16.0 years, 61% of the patients were males. Most frequent causes for ICU treatments were sepsis (22%), pneumonia (22%), or a combination of both (25%). Serum concentrations of midazolam correlated weakly with RASS (ρ = − 0.467) and Ramsay Scores (ρ = 0.476). Serum concentrations of sufentanil correlated weakly with RASS (ρ = − 0.312) and Ramsay Scores (ρ = 0.295). Correlations between BIS index and serum concentrations of midazolam (ρ = − 0.252) and sufentanil (ρ = − 0.166) were low. Correlations between drug serum concentrations and clinical or neurophysiological monitoring procedures were weak. This might be due to intersubject variability, polypharmacy with drug-drug interactions, and complex metabolism, which can be altered in critically ill patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring is not beneficial to determine depth of sedation in ICU patients.