Christos Constantinidis

Dr. Christos Constantinidis

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 August 2018 in The Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CCChristos Constantinidis
Christos Constantinidis
SFShintaro Funahashi
Shintaro Funahashi
DLDaeyeol Lee
Daeyeol Lee
JMJohn D. Murray
John D. Murray
XQXue-Lian Qi
Xue-Lian Qi
AAAmy F.T. Arnsten
Amy F.T. Arnsten
Persistent activity generated in the PFC during the delay period of working memory tasks represents information about stimuli held in memory and determines working memory performance. Alternative models of working memory, depending on the rhythmicity of discharges or exclusively on short-term synaptic plasticity, are inconsistent with the neurophysiological data. Dual Perspectives Companion Paper:Working Memory: Delay Activity, Yes! Persistent Activity? Maybe Not, by Mikael Lundqvist, Pawel Herman, and Earl K. Miller

5 January 2016 in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MRMitchell R. Riley
Mitchell R. Riley
CCChristos Constantinidis
Christos Constantinidis
The prefrontal cortex is activated during working memory, as evidenced by fMRI results in human studies and neurophysiological recordings in animal models. Persistent activity during the delay period of working memory tasks, after the offset of stimuli that subjects are required to remember, has traditionally been thought of as the neural correlate of working memory. In the last few years several findings have cast doubt on the role of this activity. By some accounts, activity in other brain areas, such as the primary visual and posterior parietal cortex, is a better predictor of information maintained in visual working memory and working memory performance; dynamic patterns of activity may convey information without requiring persistent activity at all; and prefrontal neurons may be ill-suited to represent non-spatial information about the features and identity of remembered stimuli. Alternative interpretations about the role of the prefrontal cortex have thus been suggested, such as that it provides a top-down control of information represented in other brain areas, rather than maintaining a working memory trace itself. Here we review evidence for and against the role of prefrontal persistent activity, with a focus on visual neurophysiology. We show that persistent activity predicts behavioral parameters precisely in working memory tasks. We illustrate that prefrontal cortex represents features of stimuli other than their spatial location. This information is largely absent from early cortical areas during working memory. We examine memory models not dependent on persistent activity and conclude that each of those models could mediate only a limited range of memory-dependent behaviors. We review activity decoded from brain areas other than the prefrontal cortex during working memory and demonstrate that these areas alone cannot mediate working memory maintenance, particularly in the presence of distractors. We finally discuss the discrepancy between BOLD activation and spiking activity findings, and point out that fMRI methods do not currently have the spatial precision necessary to decode information within the prefrontal cortex, which is likely organized at the micrometer scale. Therefore, we make the case that prefrontal persistent activity is both necessary and sufficient for the maintenance of information in working memory.

1 September 2019 in Trends in Neurosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CCChristos Constantinidis
Christos Constantinidis
BLBeatriz Luna
Beatriz Luna

13 April 2022 in Cell Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CGClément M. Garin
Clément M. Garin
YHYuki Hori
Yuki Hori
SEStefan Everling
Stefan Everling
CWChristopher T. Whitlow
Christopher T. Whitlow
FCFinnegan J. Calabro
Finnegan J. Calabro
CCChristos Constantinidis
Christos Constantinidis
The human default mode network (DMN) is engaged at rest and in cognitive states such as self-directed thoughts. Interconnected homologous cortical areas in primates constitute a network considered as the equivalent. Here, based on a cross-species comparison of the DMN between humans and non-hominoid primates (macaques, marmosets, and mouse lemurs), we report major dissimilarities in connectivity profiles. Most importantly, the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of non-hominoid primates is poorly engaged with the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), though strong correlated activity between the human PCC and the mPFC is a key feature of the human DMN. Instead, a fronto-temporal resting-state network involving the mPFC was detected consistently across non-hominoid primate species. These common functional features shared between non-hominoid primates but not with humans suggest a substantial gap in the organization of the primate’s DMN and its associated cognitive functions.

1 July 2016 in Cerebral Cortex
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMitchell R. Riley
Mitchell R. Riley
XQXue-Lian Qi
Xue-Lian Qi
CCChristos Constantinidis
Christos Constantinidis
Functional specialization of areas along the anterior–posterior axis of the lateral prefrontal cortex has been speculated but little evidence exists about distinct neurophysiological properties between prefrontal sub-regions. To address this issue we divided the lateral prefrontal cortex into a posterior-dorsal, a mid-dorsal, an anterior-dorsal, a posterior-ventral, and an anterior ventral region. Selectivity for spatial locations, shapes, and colors was evaluated in six monkeys never trained in working memory tasks, while they viewed the stimuli passively. Recordings from over two thousand neurons revealed systematic differences between anterior and posterior regions. In the dorsal prefrontal cortex, anterior regions exhibited the largest receptive fields, longest response latencies, and lowest amount of information for stimuli. In the ventral prefrontal cortex, posterior regions were characterized by a low percentage of responsive neurons to any stimuli we used, consistent with high specialization for stimulus features. Additionally, spatial information was more prominent in the dorsal and color in ventral regions. Our results provide neurophysiological evidence for a rostral-caudal gradient of stimulus selectivity through the prefrontal cortex, suggesting that posterior areas are selective for stimuli even when these are not releant for execution of a task, and that anterior areas are likely engaged in more abstract operations.

17 September 2018 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMitchell R. Riley
Mitchell R. Riley
XQXue-Lian Qi
Xue-Lian Qi
XZXin Zhou
Xin Zhou
CCChristos Constantinidis
Christos Constantinidis
The functional organization of the primate prefrontal cortex has been a matter of debate with some models speculating dorso-ventral and rostro-caudal specialization while others suggesting that information is represented dynamically by virtue of plasticity across the entire prefrontal cortex. To address functional properties and capacity for plasticity, we recorded from different prefrontal sub-regions and analyzed changes in responses following training in a spatial working memory task. This training induces more pronounced changes in anterior prefrontal regions, including increased firing rate during the delay period, selectivity, reliability, information for stimuli, representation of whether a test stimulus matched the remembered cue or not, and variability and correlation between neurons. Similar results are obtained for discrete subdivisions or when treating position along the anterior-posterior axis as a continuous variable. Our results reveal that anterior aspects of the lateral prefrontal cortex of non-human primates possess greater plasticity based on task demands.