Background: Despite its estimated high prevalence among women and increasing awareness, lipedema remains under-investigated. Ignoring its debilitating nature, surgical treatment for this condition is frequently covered by health insurance only in advanced stages and after the exhaustion of conservative therapies. Methods: A total of 1015 patients with lipedema were recruited via social media platforms. Of these, 860 patients provided answers to at least one complete section of the modified Body-Q questionnaire (response rate 85%). The Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests were utilized to assess the impact of the surgical treatment by means of patient-reported outcomes on the self-perception of various body areas. Results: The satisfaction scores among conservatively treated patients for abdominal appearance, arms, back, body, buttocks, and inner thighs showed a statistically significant decline with increasing stages of lipedema. The comparison of patient evaluation scores in the appearance domain demonstrated better patient self-perception scores in patients who received at least one session of the surgical treatment for the hips and thighs (p < 0.01), inner thighs (p < 0.01), and excess skin (0.01) scales. On the body scale, the patients who underwent liposuction again reported better satisfaction scores; however, this did not reach statistical significance (p < 0.081). In the health-related quality of life domain, the patients who received liposuction treatment reported a better outcome in the body image (p < 0.01), physical function (p = 0.05), physical symptoms (p = 0.04), and psychological function (p < 0.01) scales. Conclusions: The current study underscores the burden of lipedema of affected patients and its negative impact on self-perception. As the disease progresses, conservatively treated patients experience a decline in satisfaction with various aspects of their appearance. However, surgical interventions, particularly liposuction, does not address esthetic concerns but significantly improve health-related quality of life across multiple domains, emphasizing the comprehensive benefits of surgical intervention in the management of lipedema.

The incidence of patients with heart failure is growing steadily, particularly due to advancements in medical therapy

Background: The radial forearm flap remains the gold standard in phalloplasty in gender-affirming surgery due to its versatility and functional outcome, but the significant donor site morbidity and its impact on daily functioning and aesthetic perception remains understudied. This study provides valuable insights into the mid-term functional and aesthetic outcomes of the forearm in transgender individuals following radial forearm flap phalloplasty using widespread instruments for assessment scoring systems and for the evaluation of postoperative wound healing of surgical interventions in general. Methods: Between January 2013 and March 2018, a total of 47 patients underwent radial phalloplasty at AGAPLESION Markus Hospital, and 20 consented to participate in this cross-sectional, retrospective study evaluating functional and aesthetic outcomes post-radial forearm flap phalloplasty using standardized questionnaires (DASH, POSAS, and SBSES). A univariate median regression of each score was performed to determine the associations with selected variables, and correlation analyses between scores was performed using a nonparametric Spearman rank correlation. Results: Among the 20 participants, the median Quick DASH, DASH functionality, DASH sport and music, and DASH work scores indicated minimal to no functional impairment. Scar evaluations using the PSAS, OSAS, and SBSES scales showed overall patient satisfaction with minimal concerns regarding pigmentation and scar texture. Notably, an increase of 0.27 cm² in wound surface area added one point to the DASH sport and music score (p = 0.037). Statistical analysis also demonstrated a significant correlation between functional and aesthetic assessment scores. Conclusions: The radial forearm phalloplasty donor site, evaluated by the PSAS, OSAS, and SBSES scales, leads to minimal or no functional impairment; however, the worsening of the DASH sport and music score with increasing wound surface reflects a direct relation between wound size and functional impairment.

OBJECTIVES: To study the risk factors for mortality, moderate or more left atrioventricular valve regurgitation (LAVVR) and reoperation after the surgical repair of complete atrioventricular septal defect (cAVSD) in a single centre. METHODS: The current study is a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgical repair of cAVSD between 2000 and 2021. Patients with unbalanced ventricles not amenable to biventricular repair, double outlet right ventricle and malpositioned great arteries were excluded. The clinical predictors of outcome for end points were analysed with univariate and multivariable Cox regression analysis or Fine–Gray modelling for competing risks. Time-dependent end points were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier curve analysis and cumulative incidence curves. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 2.3 years. Among 220 consecutive patients were 10 (4.6%) operative and 21 late mortalities (9.6%). A total of 26 patients were identified to have immediate postoperative moderate or more regurgitation and 10 of them ultimately died. By multivariable analysis prematurity and having more than moderate regurgitation immediately after the operation were identified as predictors of overall mortality (P = 0.003, P = 0.012). Five- and ten-year survival rates were lower for patients with immediate postoperative moderate or more LAVVR {51.9% [confidence interval (CI): 27.5–71.7%]} when compared to patients without moderate or more regurgitation [93.2% (CI: 87.1–96.4%) and 91.3% (CI: 83.6–95.5%)]. CONCLUSIONS: The patients who undergo cAVSD repair remain subjected to a heavy burden of disease related to postoperative residual LAVVR. Immediate postoperative moderate or more LAVVR contributes significantly to overall mortality. Whether a second run of bypass can decrease this observed mortality should be investigated.

Objectives: This study compares outcomes of patch repair vs direct anastomosis in neonatal aortic arch repair with the goal of identifying any long-term differences in restenosis, reoperation, and reintervention rates. Methods: Neonates who underwent aortic arch repair via median sternotomy between 2004 and 2021, using either patch repair or direct anastomosis techniques, were included in this study. Patch materials were glutaraldehyde-treated pericardium and femoral vein homograft. Statistical comparisons included descriptive and bivariable analyses to evaluate patient characteristics, reintervention, reoperation, and restenosis at a 20 mm Hg threshold. Results: Seventy-five neonates, who underwent neonatal arch repair using patch technique (n = 53) or direct anastomosis (n = 22), were included in the study. No significant differences in reintervention, reoperation, or restenosis were found between surgical approaches at 20 mm Hg threshold (P > .13). Patient characteristics such as younger age (P = .06), shorter height (P = .1), and lower weight (P = .2), at the time of surgery were not significant predictors of restenosis. Cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest times were shorter with direct anastomosis. Ten-year mortality was 11% (n = 8). Conclusions: There is no clear advantage of either patch or direct anastomosis for neonatal aortic arch repair regarding early- to mid-term outcomes. Patient-specific factors did not appear to be stronger predictors of restenosis risk than the surgical technique employed.