Lucy Boyce Kennedy

Dr. Lucy Boyce Kennedy

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 January 2020 in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LKLucy Boyce Kennedy
Lucy Boyce Kennedy
ASApril Salama
April Salama
Cancer immunotherapies, including checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive cell therapy, manipulate the immune system to recognize and attack cancer cells. These therapies have the potential to induce durable responses in multiple solid and hematologic malignancies and thus have transformed treatment algorithms for numerous tumor types. Cancer immunotherapies lead to unique toxicity profiles distinct from the toxicities of other cancer therapies, depending on their mechanism of action. These toxicities often require specific management, which can include steroids and immune‐modulating therapy and for which consensus guidelines have been published. This review will focus on the toxicities of checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, including pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Youssef BouferraaYoussef Bouferraa
Youssef Bouferraa
CFCallie Fares
Callie Fares
MZMaroun Bou Zerdan
Maroun Bou Zerdan
LKLucy Boyce Kennedy
Lucy Boyce Kennedy
Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of melanoma, but its limitations due to resistance and variable patient responses have become apparent. The microbiota, which refers to the complex ecosystem of microorganisms that inhabit the human body, has emerged as a promising area of research for its potential role in melanoma development and treatment response. Recent studies have highlighted the role of microbiota in influencing the immune system and its response to melanoma, as well as its influence on the development of immune-related adverse events associated with immunotherapy. In this article, we discuss the complex multifactorial mechanisms through which skin and gut microbiota can affect the development of melanoma including microbial metabolites, intra-tumor microbes, UV light, and the immune system. In addition, we will discuss the pre-clinical and clinical studies that have demonstrated the influence of different microbial profiles on response to immunotherapy. Additionally, we will explore the role of microbiota in the development of immune-mediated adverse events.

2 December 2024 in Melanoma Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DSDavid Savage
David Savage
BSBenjamin Switzer
Benjamin Switzer
RPRujul Parikh
Rujul Parikh
JSJung Min Song
Jung Min Song
CSCarolyn Stanek
Carolyn Stanek
Pauline FunchainPauline Funchain
Pauline Funchain
Aim: This study determined the characteristics of patients with early-stage melanoma (IA-IIA) who later had stage IV recurrence.

22 February 2022 in Current Oncology Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TTThach-Giao Truong
Thach-Giao Truong
LKLucy Boyce Kennedy
Lucy Boyce Kennedy
SPSapna Patel
Sapna Patel

2 June 2025 in Acta Neuropathologica Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LKLucy Boyce Kennedy
Lucy Boyce Kennedy
ASAmanda E. D. Van Swearingen
Amanda E. D. Van Swearingen
MLMarissa R. Lee
Marissa R. Lee
LRLayne W. Rogers
Layne W. Rogers
ASAlexander B. Sibley
Alexander B. Sibley
ASApril K.S. Salama
April K.S. Salama
Background: Melanoma brain metastases (MBM) have a unique molecular profile compared to extracranial metastases (ECM). Description of the biological features and clinical outcomes of MBM will facilitate the design of rational therapies. Methods: We examined the mutational landscape and gene expression profiles of MBM (74 patients) and ECM (34 patients) in paired patient samples from a previously published dataset with whole-exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing (RNAseq) data from MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). We also present findings from MBM from a new cohort of 14 patients from Duke University to strengthen investigation of somatic mutations and gene expression profiles. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was used to compare paired MBM versus lymph node (LN) metastases and skin metastases. Relative immune cell abundance was inferred using deconvolution methods. Survival outcomes from craniotomy and associations with biological features, BRAF mutation status, and PTEN expression were assessed. Results: GSEA found that autophagy signaling pathways are enriched in MBM versus LN and skin metastases. BRAF was the most frequently mutated clinically relevant gene in MBM and ECM, with NRAS and PTEN also frequently altered in MBM. The most strongly upregulated genes in autophagy pathways were glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and hemoglobin beta (HBB). An increased proportion of immune-suppressive M2 compared to tumor-suppressive M1 macrophages in MBM and ECM was identified. There was not sufficient evidence for an association between BRAF V600 mutation status or expression and overall survival (OS) from craniotomy. Conclusions: The mutational landscape and gene expression of MBM from the Duke cohort resembled those previously reported in the MDACC cohort. Upregulation of autophagy pathways was observed in patient-matched MBM versus LN and skin metastases due to upregulation of two genes, GFAP and HBB. In MBM, higher M2:M1 ratio may contribute to a therapeutically relevant immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME).

1 July 2025 in Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RKRupayan Kundu
Rupayan Kundu
ACArjun Chatterjee
Arjun Chatterjee
JPJessica Philpott
Jessica Philpott
LKLucy Boyce Kennedy
Lucy Boyce Kennedy