As in every workplace, human sustainability in dental enterprises is connected to air and water quality, eco-friendly and naturally designed working spaces and 4R’s culture. Purpose of this study is to access the preferences and knowledge on circular economy and green building construction in a sample of students and dentists in Greece. Students (N1=93) and dentists (N2= 126) filled in e-questionnaires from April to December 2022. The response rate was 17,88% for N1 and 1.94% for N2. Data revealed that both students and dentists lack knowledge on circular economy (N1=67.7%, N2=68,25%), EU regulations on amalgam disposal (N1=64.5%, N2=58.73%) and plastic recycling (N1=76.34%, N2=76,98) while they do recycle at home (N1= 80.6%, N2=82.54%) and have participated in voluntary environmental actions (N1=58.1%, N2=66.67%). Gender influences the importance of factors related to green dental practices, with women students being more prone to answer positively as important for increase costs for network changes (p=0.02), lack of environmental awareness of manufacturers (p=0.057), and poor wastewater management (p=0.01). Students from urban areas are more prone to answer positively for lack of state financial support (p=0.02), low level of green design in the building (p=0.03), low direct financial benefit of a green dental office (p=0.04), low benefit to the reputation of the green dental office (p=0.02), lack of continuing education training seminars on green dentistry (p=0.05). For dentists, no significant relationships were observed except of a weak positive relationship in increase in costs for changes related to utility networks (p=0.08) while increased wasteful energy (p=0.12) and waste of dental materials (p=0.19) seemed important only for dentists in urban areas. Women dentists were more prone to answer positively on wasting energy (p=0.024) and use of unapproved disinfection products (p=0.036). The findings contribute ideas and solutions on green dental office buildings and sustainable behaviors through educational activities and social perspective of factors such as age, experience in dentistry, gender, and urbanism. It also inspires future multi-disciplinary research on dental quality assurance, psychology of environmentalism, economics, and behavioral science in dentistry.

Students studying dentistry and nursing experience anxiety daily, which affects both their general well-being and academic achievement. Anxiety is exacerbated by several circumstances, such as stressors in one's personal life, clinical environment exposure, and academic expectations. To effectively regulate anxiety and support students' achievement, treatments that take these elements into account must be designed. In this study, 271 students from the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece's departments of dentistry and nursing were polled. Being the following resources, participants filled out an electronic questionnaire that was uploaded to Google Forms and assessed their levels of stress, anxiety, depression, resilience, hope, and spiritual well-being: a) the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS-21), b) the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-12), c) the Adult Hope Scale (AHS), d) the Resilience Assessment Questionnaire (RAQ8), and e) the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Additionally, demographic data was gathered, such as gender, educational attainment, family income, and country of origin. Statistical analyses were performed to investigate the relationships between the variables, including hierarchical multiple linear regression and t-tests. The sample consisted of 271 students from the Department of Nursing (n=126, 46.5%) and Dentistry (n=145, 53.5%), with 68.60% of them being female, 80.10% being undergraduate students, and 48.30% being from Athens, the country's capital. Comparatively speaking, 74.50 percent of nursing students were female, while 62.80% of dental students were. Compared to dental students (2.10%), nurses (40.50%) participated in postgraduate studies at a higher rate. Compared to dental students (44.80%), nursing students reported a household income of just 13.90%, which is much less than €35,000. Anxiety was reported by 51.30% of participants overall, with dental students reporting higher anxiety than nursing students. Higher family wealth was associated with reduced stress levels, while female undergraduate students reported higher levels of anxiety than their male counterparts. Hope was a strong predictor of resilience, but stress and worry had a negative correlation. Promoting students' well-being and academic success requires effective stress-reduction and resilience-building techniques aimed to not only improve student performance but also support future healthcare professionals' personal sustainability and holistic growth.

Background/ Objectives: Selecting an intraoral scanner (IOS) has evolved into a complex clinical decision that extends beyond technical performance alone. This study aimed to investigate the clinical, technical, educational, and organizational factors influencing intraoral scanner selection among dentists, evaluate awareness of ISO specifications and evidence-based criteria, and propose a conceptual framework to support evidence-based technology selection. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted among dentists practicing in Greece. A total of 86 questionnaires were returned from 271 invited participants (response rate: 31.73%). Valid sample sizes varied across analyses according to item applicability and analyzable responses. The questionnaire assessed demographic and professional characteristics, intraoral scanner use, selection criteria, awareness of ISO specifications, educational background, and evidence-related factors. Composite indices were developed to evaluate the principal decision-making dimensions. Results: Technical and clinical performance-related criteria received the highest importance ratings in intraoral scanner selection. Although participants generally reported good perceived knowledge of intraoral scanners, only 35.7% reported awareness of ISO specifications. Dentists familiar with ISO standards assigned significantly greater importance to specification-related and safety-related criteria, suggesting an association between reported ISO awareness and greater emphasis on specification- and safety-related selection criteria. Continuing professional education represented the predominant source of knowledge acquisition. Based on the integration of these findings, the EBIOS Pilot Framework (Evidence-Based Intraoral Scanner Selection Framework) is proposed as a preliminary conceptual synthesis of factors potentially relevant to evidence-informed intraoral scanner selection. Conclusions: The findings suggest that intraoral scanner selection may be understood as a multidimensional decision-making process involving technical performance, scientific evidence, professional education, and standardized quality criteria. The proposed EBIOS Pilot Framework provides a preliminary conceptual basis for future validation and refinement in larger, independent populations.