Objective We aimed to test the hypothesis that automated fibrosis score calculation and electronic reminder messages could increase the detection of advanced liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Design In this pragmatic randomised controlled trial at five general medical or diabetes clinics in Hong Kong and Malaysia, we randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention group with Fibrosis-4 index and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index automatically calculated based on routine blood tests, followed by electronic reminder messages to alert clinicians of abnormal results, or the control group with usual care. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with increased fibrosis scores who received appropriate care (referred for hepatology care or specific fibrosis assessment) within 1 year. Results Between May 2020 and Oct 2021, 1379 patients were screened, of whom 533 and 528 were assigned to the intervention and control groups, respectively. A total of 55 out of 165 (33.3%) patients with increased fibrosis scores in the intervention group received appropriate care, compared with 4 of 131 (3.1%) patients in the control group (difference 30.2% (95% CI 22.4% to 38%); p<0.001). Overall, 11 out of 533 (2.1%) patients in the intervention group and 1 out of 528 (0.2%) patients in the control group were confirmed to have advanced liver disease (difference 1.9% (95% CI 0.61% to 3.5%); p=0.006). Conclusion Automated fibrosis score calculation and electronic reminders can increase referral of patients with type 2 diabetes and abnormal fibrosis scores at non-hepatology settings. Trial registration number NCT04241575.

Background Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) affects over 30% of the general population and is the fastest growing cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Current guidelines recommend HCC surveillance in patients with cirrhosis when annual HCC incidence exceeds 1% without specifying the role of non-invasive tests in patient selection. Objective To define non-invasive test thresholds to select patients with MASLD for HCC surveillance. Design A multicentre longitudinal study of adults with MASLD from 16 tertiary centres in the USA, Europe and Asia between February 2004 and January 2023. Primary outcome was incident HCC. Results 12 950 patients had Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) (mean age 51.7 years; 41.1% male). At a median follow-up of 47.7 (IQR 23.3–72.3) months, 109 (0.8%) developed HCC. FIB-4 was below the low cut-off (<1.3 if aged <65 years and <2.0 if aged ≥65 years), between the low cut-off and <2.67, 2.67 to <3.25, and ≥3.25 in 66.3%, 23.9%, 3.4% and 6.4% of patients; the corresponding annual HCC incidence was 0.07%, 0.17%, 0.77% and 1.18%. As a stand-alone test, the annual HCC incidence exceeded 0.2% for LSM ≥10 kPa and 1% for LSM ≥20 kPa. If LSM was performed as a second step only among patients with FIB-4 above the low cut-off, the annual HCC incidence exceeded 0.2% for LSM ≥10 kPa and 1% for LSM ≥15 kPa. Conclusion HCC surveillance should be offered to patients with MASLD with FIB-4 ≥3.25 or LSM ≥20 kPa. When a two-step approach is adopted, LSM ≥15 kPa in patients with increased FIB-4 predicts a high HCC risk.

The epidemiology of acute hepatitis A and E has been changing over the last 2 decades. The impact of concomitant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) on clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the morbidity and mortality of patients with acute hepatitis A or E with and without underlying CHB. We identified consecutive patients with acute hepatitis A or E based on hepatitis serology from the electronic medical records of the Hospital Authority of Hong Kong from January 2000 to December 2016. Hepatic events, all-cause mortality, and liver-related mortality within 30 days of the diagnosis of acute hepatitis were evaluated. The cohort included 1068 cases of acute hepatitis A and 846 cases of acute hepatitis E. More patients with acute hepatitis E than those with acute hepatitis A had underlying CHB (13.5% vs 8.0%; P < .001). Patients with hepatitis E had more all-cause mortality (3.9% vs 0.6%; P < .001), liver-related mortality (2.0% vs 0.3%; P < .001), and hepatic events (2.8% vs 0.3%; P < .001) within 30 days from diagnosis. In patients with acute hepatitis E, underlying renal failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.90; P < .001) and age ≥50 years (aHR, 3.25; P = .036) were associated with 30-day all-cause mortality, whereas CHB (aHR, 3.34; P = .02) was associated with 30-day liver-related mortality. The mortality is higher in patients with acute hepatitis E than in those with hepatitis A. Coexisting CHB is the independent risk factor for liver-related mortality in patients with acute hepatitis E.