Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) pose an increasingly significant global burden, driven by urbanization, population explosion, global travel, changes in human behavior, and inadequate public health systems. The recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic highlights the urgent need for innovative and robust technologies to effectively monitor newly emerging pathogens. Rapid identification, epidemiological surveillance, and transmission mitigation are crucial challenges for ensuring public health safety. Genomics has emerged as a pivotal tool in public health during pandemics, enabling the diagnosis, management, and prediction of infections, as well as the analysis and identification of cross-species interactions and the categorization of infectious agents. Recent advancements in high-throughput DNA sequencing tools have facilitated rapid and precise identification and characterization of emerging pathogens. This review article provides insights into the latest advances in various genomic techniques for pathogen detection and tracking and their applications in global outbreak surveillance. We assess methods that leverage pathogen sequences and explore the role of genomic analysis in understanding the epidemiology of newly emerged infectious diseases. Additionally, we address technical challenges and limitations, ethical and legal considerations, and highlight opportunities for integrating genomics with other surveillance approaches. By delving into the prospects and obstacles of genomics, we can gain valuable insights into its role in mitigating the threats posed by emerging pathogens and improving global preparedness in the face of future outbreaks.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most heterogeneous and deadly diseases, with a global incidence of 1.5 million cases per year. Genomics has revolutionized the clinical management of CRC by enabling comprehensive molecular profiling of cancer. However, a deeper understanding of the molecular factors is needed to identify new prognostic and predictive markers that can assist in designing more effective therapeutic regimens for the improved management of CRC. Recent breakthroughs in single-cell analysis have identified new cell subtypes that play a critical role in tumor progression and could serve as potential therapeutic targets. Spatial analysis of the transcriptome and proteome holds the key to unlocking pathogenic cellular interactions, while liquid biopsy profiling of molecular variables from serum holds great potential for monitoring therapy resistance. Furthermore, gene expression signatures from various pathways have emerged as promising prognostic indicators in colorectal cancer and have the potential to enhance the development of equitable medicine. The advancement of these technologies for identifying new markers, particularly in the domain of predictive and personalized medicine, has the potential to improve the management of patients with CRC. Further investigations utilizing similar methods could uncover molecular subtypes specific to emerging therapies, potentially strengthening the development of personalized medicine for CRC patients.

The standard-of-care (SOC) for genomic testing of myeloid cancers primarily relies on karyotyping/fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) (cytogenetic analysis) and targeted gene panels (usually ≤54 genes) that harbor hotspot pathogenic variants (molecular genetic analysis). Despite this combinatorial approach, ~50% of myeloid cancer genomes remain cytogenetically normal, and the limited sequencing variant profiles obtained from targeted panels are unable to resolve the molecular etiology of many myeloid tumors. In this study, we evaluated the performance and clinical utility of combinatorial use of optical genome mapping (OGM) and a 523-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel for comprehensive genomic profiling of 30 myeloid tumors and compared it to SOC cytogenetic methods (karyotyping and FISH) and a 54-gene NGS panel. OGM and the 523-gene NGS panel had an analytical concordance of 100% with karyotyping, FISH, and the 54-gene panel, respectively. Importantly, the IPSS-R cytogenetic risk group changed from very good/good to very poor in 22% of MDS (2/9) cases based on comprehensive profiling (karyotyping, FISH, and 54-gene panel vs. OGM and 523-gene panel), while additionally identifying six compound heterozygous events of potential clinical relevance in six cases (6/30, 20%). This cost-effective approach of using OGM and a 523-gene NGS panel for comprehensive genomic profiling of myeloid cancers demonstrated increased yield of actionable targets that can potentially result in improved clinical outcomes.

Copy number alterations (CNAs) are significant in tumor initiation and progression. Identifying these aberrations is crucial for targeted therapies and personalized cancer diagnostics. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods present advantages in scalability and cost-effectiveness, surpassing limitations associated with reference assemblies and probe capacities in traditional laboratory approaches. This retrospective study evaluated CNAs in 50 FFPE tumor samples (breast cancer, ovarian carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, melanoma, and prostate carcinoma) using Illumina’s TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500) and the Affymetrix Oncoscan Molecular Inversion Probe (OS-MIP) (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). NGS analysis with the NxClinical 6.2 software demonstrated a high sensitivity and specificity (100%) for CNA detection, with a complete concordance rate as compared to the OS-MIP. All 54 known CNAs were identified by NGS, with gains being the most prevalent (63%). Notable CNAs were observed in MYC (18%), TP53 (12%), BRAF (8%), PIK3CA, EGFR, and FGFR1 (6%) genes. The diagnostic parameters exhibited high accuracy, including a positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall diagnostic accuracy. This study underscores NxClinical as a reliable software for identifying clinically relevant gene alterations using NGS TSO500, offering valuable insights for personalized cancer treatment strategies based on CNA analysis.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), induced a global pandemic with a diverse array of clinical manifestations. While the acute phase of the pandemic may be waning, the intricacies of COVID-19′s impact on neurological health remain a crucial area of investigation. Early recognition of the spectrum of COVID-19 symptoms, ranging from mild fever and cough to life-threatening respiratory distress and multi-organ failure, underscored the significance of neurological complications, including anosmia, seizures, stroke, disorientation, encephalopathy, and paralysis. Notably, patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission due to neurological challenges or due to them exhibiting neurological abnormalities in the ICU have shown increased mortality rates. COVID-19 can lead to a range of neurological complications such as anosmia, stroke, paralysis, cranial nerve deficits, encephalopathy, delirium, meningitis, seizures, etc., in affected patients. This review elucidates the burgeoning landscape of neurological sequelae associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and explores the underlying neurobiological mechanisms driving these diverse manifestations. A meticulous examination of potential neuroinvasion routes by SARS-CoV-2 underscores the intricate interplay between the virus and the nervous system. Moreover, we dissect the diverse neurological manifestations emphasizing the necessity of a multifaceted approach to understanding the disease’s neurological footprint. In addition to elucidating the pathophysiological underpinnings, this review surveys current therapeutic modalities and delineates prospective avenues for neuro-COVID research. By integrating epidemiological, clinical, and diagnostic parameters, we endeavor to foster a comprehensive analysis of the nexus between COVID-19 and neurological health, thereby laying the groundwork for targeted therapeutic interventions and long-term management strategies.

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is characterized by the inability of a cell to repair the double-stranded breaks using the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway. The deficiency of the HRR pathway results in defective DNA repair, leading to genomic instability and tumorigenesis. The presence of HRD has been found to make tumors sensitive to ICL-inducing platinum-based therapies and poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]–ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi). However, there are no standardized methods to measure and report HRD phenotypes. Herein, we compare optical genome mapping (OGM), chromosomal microarray (CMA), and a 523-gene NGS panel for HRD score calculations. This retrospective study included the analysis of 196 samples, of which 10 were gliomas, 176 were hematological malignancy samples, and 10 were controls. The 10 gliomas were evaluated with both CMA and OGM, and 30 hematological malignancy samples were evaluated with both the NGS panel and OGM. To verify the scores in a larger cohort, 135 cases were evaluated with the NGS panel and 71 cases with OGM. The HRD scores were calculated using a combination of three HRD signatures that included loss of heterozygosity (LOH), telomeric allelic imbalance (TAI), and large-scale transitions (LST). In the ten glioma cases analyzed with OGM and CMA using the same DNA (to remove any tumor percentage bias), the HRD scores (mean ± SEM) were 13.2 (±4.2) with OGM compared to 3.7 (±1.4) with CMA. In the 30 hematological malignancy cases analyzed with OGM and the 523-gene NGS panel, the HRD scores were 7.6 (±2.2) with OGM compared to 2.6 (±0.8) with the 523-gene NGS panel. OGM detected 70.8% and 66.8% of additional variants that are considered HRD signatures in gliomas and hematological malignancies, respectively. The higher sensitivity of OGM to capture HRD signature variants might enable a more accurate and precise correlation with response to PARPi and platinum-based drugs. This study reveals HRD signatures that are cryptic to current standard of care (SOC) methods used for assessing the HRD phenotype and presents OGM as an attractive alternative with higher resolution and sensitivity to accurately assess the HRD phenotype.