To evaluate the stability of the retrograde intramedullary nail (IMN), angled blade plate (ABP), and a locked internal fixator (Less Invasive Stabilization System [LISS], Synthes, Paoli, PA) for internal fixation of distal femur fractures. Destructive biomechanical testing of matched pairs of fresh–frozen human cadaveric bone–implant constructs. Biomechanical laboratory. A fracture model was created to simulate an AO/OTA33-A3 fracture. Forty-eight matched pairs of specimens were used. Six groups of 8 pairs each were tested to failure: LISS versus ABP and LISS versus IMN (axial, torsional, and cyclical axial). Load to failure, mode of failure, energy to failure, displacement at the load to failure, and stiffness. Fixation strength (load/moment to failure) of the LISS constructs was 34% greater in axial loading (P = 0.01) and 32% less in torsional loading (P = 0.05) compared with ABP constructs and 13% greater in axial loading (P = 0.35) and 45% less in torsional loading (P < 0.01) compared with IMN constructs. Loss of distal fixation in axial loading occurred in 1 of 16 cases with the LISS, in 3 of 8 cases with the ABP, and in 8 of 8 cases with the IMN. Cyclical axial loading demonstrated significantly less plastic deformation for the LISS construct compared with ABP constructs (P < 0.01) and similar plastic deformation compared with IMN constructs (P = 0.98). All 3 fixation devices (LISS, ABP, and IMN) offer sufficient torsional stability and sufficient proximal fixation that withstands axial loading without failing. The LISS provides improved distal fixation, especially in osteoporotic bone, at the expense of more displacement at the fracture site.

Background: The less invasive stabilization system (LISS) is an internal fixator that utilizes unicortical locked screws for fixation of distal femur fractures. A question is whether locked unicortical screw fixation is sufficient, when compared with a standard implant such as a blade plate. Methods: Eight matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric femora were instrumented with either the LISS or a 95-degree blade plate. A 4-cm supracondylar gap fracture model was created and all bone-implant constructs were tested to failure in axial loading. Results: All constructs failed by plastic deformation of the implant. There was no significant difference between the LISS and the blade plate constructs with respect to load to failure. Conclusions: Despite unicortical fixation axial loading to failure of the LISS did not result in implant/screw pull-out neither proximally nor distally. However, there does not appear to be a biomechanical advantage of using the LISS as opposed to a blade plate in bones with high bone mineral density.

In this study, a simple approach for estimating the effect of surface roughness on the fatigue strength of additive manufactured Ti‐6Al‐4V is investigated. Surface roughness parameters are used to estimate the elastic stress concentration factor and the resulting fatigue stress concentration factor. The estimated fatigue strengths are then compared with experimentally obtained fatigue strengths for specimen batches with varying surface conditions. Results show that the estimated fatigue strengths are comparable with the experimental fatigue strengths, and the predicted stress‐life curves fit the experimental data reasonably well.