Background: Deep brain stimulation has become an established technology for the treatment of patients with a wide variety of conditions, including movement disorders, psychiatric disorders, epilepsy, and pain. Surgery for implantation of DBS devices has enhanced our understanding of human physiology, which in turn has led to advances in DBS technology. Our group has previously published on these advances, proposed future developments, and examined evolving indications for DBS. Summary: The crucial roles of structural MR imaging pre-, intra-, and post-DBS procedure in target visualization and confirmation of targeting are described, with discussion of new MR sequences and higher field strength MRI enabling direct visualization of brain targets. The incorporation of functional and connectivity imaging in procedural workup and their contribution to anatomical modelling is reviewed. Various tools for targeting and implanting electrodes, including frame-based, frameless, and robot-assisted, are surveyed, and their pros and cons are described. Updates on brain atlases and various software used for planning target coordinates and trajectories are presented. The pros and cons of asleep versus awake surgery are discussed. The role and value of microelectrode recording and local field potentials are described, as well as the role of intraoperative stimulation. Technical aspects of novel electrode designs and implantable pulse generators are presented and compared.

Brain metastases are common among adult patients with solid malignancies and are increasingly being treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). As more patients with brain metastases are becoming eligible for SRS, there is a need for practical review of patient selection and treatment considerations. Two patient cases were identified to use as the foundation for a discussion of a wide and representative range of management principles: (A) SRS alone for 5 to 15 lesions and (B) a large single metastasis to be treated with pre- or postoperative SRS. Patient selection, fractionation, prescription dose, treatment technique, and dose constraints are discussed. Literature relevant to these cases is summarized to provide a framework for treatment of similar patients. Treatment of brain metastases with SRS requires many considerations including optimal patient selection, fractionation selection, and plan optimization. Case-based practice guidelines developed by the Radiosurgery Society provide a practical guide to the common scenarios noted above affecting patients with metastatic brain tumors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: ChatGPT is a novel natural language processing artificial intelligence (AI) module where users enter any question or command and receive a single text response within seconds. As AI becomes more accessible, patients may begin to use it as a resource for medical information and advice. This is the first study to assess the neurosurgical information that is provided by ChatGPT. METHODS: ChatGPT was accessed in January 2023, and prompts were created requesting treatment information for 40 common neurosurgical conditions. Quantitative characteristics were collected, and four independent reviewers evaluated the responses using the DISCERN tool. Prompts were compared against the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) “For Patients” webpages. RESULTS: ChatGPT returned text organized in paragraph and bullet-point lists. ChatGPT responses were shorter (mean 270.1 ± 41.9 words; AANS webpage 1634.5 ± 891.3 words) but more difficult to read (mean Flesch-Kincaid score 32.4 ± 6.7; AANS webpage 37.1 ± 7.0). ChatGPT output was found to be of “fair” quality (mean DISCERN score 44.2 ± 4.1) and significantly inferior to the “good” overall quality of the AANS patient website (57.7 ± 4.4). ChatGPT was poor in providing references/resources and describing treatment risks. ChatGPT provided 177 references, of which 68.9% were inaccurate and 33.9% were completely falsified. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT is an adaptive resource for neurosurgical information but has shortcomings that limit the quality of its responses, including poor readability, lack of references, and failure to fully describe treatment options. Hence, patients and providers should remain wary of the provided content. As ChatGPT or other AI search algorithms continue to improve, they may become a reliable alternative for medical information.

✓ Harvey Cushing performed over 2000 operations on patients with brain tumors, including 832 for gliomas. He implanted radioactive radium needles, known as a “radium bomb,” in a small number of these patients. He was not impressed with the results and did not pursue this method of treatment in a serious way. The authors present here Cushing's little-known experience with brachytherapy and discuss the reasons for his lack of interest in this technique, despite his advocacy of radiotherapy for certain lesions. An interesting perspective is offered for contemporary neurosurgeons involved in the treatment of brain tumors with cranial irradiation.

Introduction: Noninvasive frameless modalities have become increasingly utilized for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for benign and malignant pathologies. There is minimal comparison in the literature of frame-based (FB) and mask-based (MB) SRS. With the dual capabilities of the Elekta Gamma Knife® Icon™, we sought to compare patient perceptions of FB and MB SRS with respect to comfort and pain and to examine effects of lesion type on the patient experience of SRS. Methods: Over a 1-year period, patients who underwent single fraction, fractionated or hypofractionated FB or MB Gamma Knife SRS at our institution were given an 8-question survey about their experience with the procedure immediately after treatment was completed. Descriptive statistics were applied. Results: A total of 117 patients completed the survey with 65 FB and 52 MB SRS treatments. Mean pain for FB SRS (5.64 ± 2.55) was significantly greater than mean pain for MB SRS (0.92 ± 2.24; t₁₁₄ = 10.46, p < 0.001). Patient comfort during the procedure was also higher for those having MB SRS (p < 0.001). Mixed results were obtained when investigating if benign versus malignant diagnosis affected patient experience of SRS. For the purposes of this study, malignant diagnoses were almost entirely metastatic lesions. Diagnosis played no role on pain levels when all patients were analyzed together. The treatment technique had no effect on patient comfort in patients with benign diagnoses, while patients with malignant diagnoses treated with MB SRS were more likely to be comfortable (p < 0.001). Among patient’s receiving FB treatments, diagnosis played no role on patient comfort. When only MB treatments were analyzed, patients were more likely to be comfortable if they had a malignant lesion (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Patients treated with MB SRS experience the procedure as more comfortable and less painful compared to those treated using a FB modality. Overall, this difference was not affected by a benign versus a malignant diagnosis and the treatment type is more indicative of the patient experience during SRS. A more homogenous sample between modalities and diagnoses and further follow-up with the patient’s input on their experience would be beneficial.