Zehua Song

Dr. Zehua Song

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 July 2023 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BZBosong Zou
Bosong Zou
LZLisheng Zhang
Lisheng Zhang
XXXiaoqing Xue
Xiaoqing Xue
Rui TanRui Tan
Rui Tan
PJpengchang jiang
pengchang jiang
Wei HuaWei Hua
Wei Hua
The battery system, as the core energy storage device of new energy vehicles, faces increasing safety issues and threats. An accurate and robust fault diagnosis technique is crucial to guarantee the safe, reliable, and robust operation of lithium-ion batteries. However, in battery systems, various faults are difficult to diagnose and isolate due to their similar features and internal coupling relationships. In this paper, the current research of advanced battery system fault diagnosis technology is reviewed. Firstly, the existing types of battery faults are introduced in detail, where cell faults include progressive and sudden faults, and system faults include a sensor, management system, and connection component faults. Then, the fault mechanisms are described, including overcharge, overdischarge, overheat, overcool, large rate charge and discharge, and inconsistency. The existing fault diagnosis methods are divided into four main types. The current research and development of model-based, data-driven, knowledge-based, and statistical analysis-based methods for fault diagnosis are summarized. Finally, the future development trend of battery fault diagnosis technology is prospected. This paper provides a comprehensive insight into the fault and defect diagnosis of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles, aiming to promote the further development of new energy vehicles.

24 June 2024 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZSZehua Song
Zehua Song
ZLZekai Li
Zekai Li
Ziyu LiuZiyu Liu
Ziyu Liu
In order to achieve the International Air Transport Association’s (IATA) goal of achieving net-zero emissions in the aviation industry by 2050, there has been a growing emphasis globally on the technological development and practical application of sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs). Discrepancies in feedstock and production processes result in differences in composition between SAFs and traditional aviation fuels, ultimately affecting the emission performance of the two types of fuel. This paper discusses the impact of CO2/NOx/SO2/CO/PM/UHC emissions from the aviation industry on the natural environment and human health by comparing the two types of fuel under the same conditions. Fuel combustion is a complex process in the combustor of an engine, which transfers chemical energy into heat energy. The completeness of combustion is related to the fuel properties, including spray, evaporation, and flammability. Therefore, engine performance is not only affected by fuel performance, but also interacts with engine structure and control laws. The CO2 emissions of SAFs differ significantly from traditional aviation fuels from a lifecycle analysis perspective, and most SAFs can reduce CO2 emissions by 41–89%. Compared with traditional aviation fuels, SAFs and blended fuels can significantly reduce SO2 and PM emissions. Pure Fischer–Tropsch hydroprocessed synthesized paraffinic kerosine (FT-SPK) can reduce SO2 and PM emissions by 92% and 70–95% respectively, owing to its extremely low sulfur and aromatic compound content. In contrast, the differences in NOx emissions between the two types of fuel are not significant, as their generation mechanisms largely stem from thermal drive and turbulent flow in the combustor, with emissions performance being correlated to power output and flame temperature profile in engine testing. CO and UHC emissions are related to engine operating conditions and the physical/chemical properties of the SAFs, with no significant upward or downward trend. Therefore, SAFs have significant advantages over conventional aviation fuels in terms of CO2, SO2, and PM emissions, and can effectively reduce the hazards of aviation to the environment and human health.

13 July 2024 in Aerospace
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDShengfei Dong
Shengfei Dong
ZSZehua Song
Zehua Song
Zheyi MengZheyi Meng
Zheyi Meng
Ziyu LiuZiyu Liu
Ziyu Liu
As global warming intensifies, the world is increasingly concerned about carbon emissions. As an important industry that affects carbon emissions, the air transportation industry takes on the important task of energy saving and emission reduction. For this reason, major airlines have designed or will design different kinds of new-energy aircraft; however, each aircraft has a different scope of application according to its energy source. Biofuels have an obvious carbon emission reduction effect in the whole life cycle, which can offset the drawback of the high pollutant emission of traditional fossil fuels in the preparation and combustion stages. At the same time, a battery has zero emissions in the operating condition, while the low energy density also makes it more applicable to short-range navigation in small aircraft. In this paper, the development direction of a biofuel–electric hybrid aircraft is proposed based on the current development of green aviation, combining the characteristics of biofuel and electric aircraft.

21 July 2025 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZSZehua Song
Zehua Song
YXYan Xinsai
Yan Xinsai
Ziyu LiuZiyu Liu
Ziyu Liu
XYXiaoyi Yang
Xiaoyi Yang
Sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) are vitally important for aviation decarbonization. The laminar burning velocity (LBV), a key parameter reflecting the combustion behavior of fuel/oxidizer mixtures, serves as a fundamental metric for evaluating SAF performance. This paper systematically reviews and evaluates the LBV experiment method and the performance of traditional aviation fuel, SAFs produced via different pathways, and individual components (n-alkanes, iso-alkanes, cycloalkanes, and aromatic hydrocarbons, as well as the impacts of isomers and homologues) in aviation fuels. It is found that LBV values of different SAFs exhibit significant fluctuations, approaching or slightly deviating from those of conventional aviation fuels. Carbon number, branching degree, substituent types, and testing methods in the components all affect LBV performance. Specifically, increased branching in iso-alkanes reduces LBV, cyclohexane and benzene show higher LBV than their methylated counterparts (methylcyclohexane and toluene), and n-alkylcyclohexanes/benzenes with short (C1–C3) side chains demonstrate minimal LBV variation. Spherical flame methods yield more consistent (and generally lower) LBV values than stagnation flame techniques. These findings provide insights for optimizing SAF–conventional fuel blends and enhancing drop-in compatibility while ensuring operational safety and usability.