FELIPE Galván-Magaña

Dr. FELIPE Galván-Magaña

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2015 in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMarloes Poortvliet
Marloes Poortvliet
JOJeanine L. Olsen
Jeanine L. Olsen
DCDonald A. Croll
Donald A. Croll
Giacomo BernardiGiacomo Bernardi
Giacomo Bernardi
KNKelly Newton
Kelly Newton
GHGalice Hoarau
Galice Hoarau

21 December 2011 in Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMA. Maz-Courrau
A. Maz-Courrau
CLC. López-Vera
C. López-Vera
FELIPE Galván-MagañaFELIPE Galván-Magaña
FELIPE Galván-Magaña
OEO. Escobar-Sánchez
O. Escobar-Sánchez
RRR. Rosíles-Martínez
R. Rosíles-Martínez
ASA. Sanjuán-Muñoz
A. Sanjuán-Muñoz

8 July 2011 in Biological Trace Element Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AOAlfredo Ordiano-Flores
Alfredo Ordiano-Flores
FELIPE Galván-MagañaFELIPE Galván-Magaña
FELIPE Galván-Magaña
RRRene Rosiles-Martínez
Rene Rosiles-Martínez

26 November 2014 in Animal Biotelemetry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EHE Mauricio Hoyos-Padilla
E Mauricio Hoyos-Padilla
JKJames T Ketchum
James T Ketchum
AKA Peter Klimley
A Peter Klimley
FELIPE Galván-MagañaFELIPE Galván-Magaña
FELIPE Galván-Magaña
Little information exists on the vertical and horizontal movements of juvenile scalloped hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna lewini). Measurements of the sizes of juveniles caught in nets close to shore and those swimming in schools at seamounts and islands in the southwestern Gulf of California, Mexico indicate that at least part of the population undergoes a migration during their life cycle at a length of approximately 115 cm total length (TL) from coastal to offshore waters. Three juvenile hammerhead sharks were outfitted with archival tags in Mazatlan and La Paz Bay (LPB), Mexico during February 2006 and January 2007, respectively.

16 July 2016 in Animal Biotelemetry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EHE. Mauricio Hoyos-Padilla
E. Mauricio Hoyos-Padilla
AKA. Peter Klimley
A. Peter Klimley
FELIPE Galván-MagañaFELIPE Galván-Magaña
FELIPE Galván-Magaña
AAAlex Antoniou
Alex Antoniou
Although the effort in the study of white sharks in Mexico is rapidly elucidating adult biology, almost nothing is known about the juveniles. Current understanding of this life history is based largely on the incidental take of juveniles in nursery grounds in the Pacific coast of Baja California and some individuals tagged in the USA that have migrated to Mexican waters. Also, it is not known how or when they recruit to adult aggregation sites or how they learn to make seasonal migrations offshore. Five white sharks were manually tracked using ultrasonic transmitters with depth and temperature sensors between 2006 and 2007. Additional white sharks were tagged (N = 60) with long-lived coded transmitters and detected at listening stations located on the west coast of the United States of America and Guadalupe Island (GI) from August 2008 to October 2015. We found that: (1) juvenile white sharks remained close to the island throughout the day between the surface and 50 m depth in warm waters (from 14 to 20 °C), whereas the adults moved offshore into deep waters during the day and stayed close to the island during the night presenting a broader tolerance of colder waters (from 9 to 20 °C); (2) tagged white sharks had a positive correlation between total length and habitat range, and the core areas of adults were related to pinniped colonies; (3) adults patrolled in deep waters in November and December when the northern elephant seals (NESs) returned back to the island for pupping with their mean mass higher than during the winter post-breeding migration; (4) tagged juvenile white sharks remained near the island for 12–14 months before departing; and (5) tagged subadults undertook coastal migrations before starting their offshore migrations. The data collected in our study suggest that white shark juveniles arrive to GI from nursery grounds on the mainland after they have reached at least 180 cm TL; then, they remained around the island for several months, potentially taking advantage of the diversity of prey. In addition, they may start their first offshore migrations, coming back to their nursery grounds and GI before they reach maturity, while at GI juveniles stayed close to the shore and in shallow water to avoid adults, probably feeding on demersal prey and species that perform nocturnal migrations such as squid and mackerel. It is argued that the distribution of the large white sharks in GI is controlled by the availability of NES and that adult white sharks look for this prey in deep waters during the day in the vicinity of the seal colonies, taking advantage of the great visibility of GI waters. It is also possible that white sharks take advantage of NES in GI before they go to their pupping grounds to give birth in California and Baja California or to their offshore migration to the west.

23 May 2015 in Environmental Biology of Fishes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AHAna Hacohen-Domené
Ana Hacohen-Domené
RMRaúl Martínez-Rincón
Raúl Martínez-Rincón
FELIPE Galván-MagañaFELIPE Galván-Magaña
FELIPE Galván-Magaña
NCNatalí Cárdenas-Palomo
Natalí Cárdenas-Palomo
RPRafael de la Parra-Venegas
Rafael de la Parra-Venegas
ADAlistair D. M. Dove
Alistair D. M. Dove