Introduction: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign published the Hour-1 Sepsis Bundle in 2018. The first-hour management of patients with sepsis in the emergency department (ED) is important, as suggested in the Hour-1 Sepsis Bundle. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate 28-day mortality and delayed septic shock with use of a complete and incomplete Hour-1 Sepsis Bundle in the ED. Methods: This prospective cohort study included adult patients with sepsis from March to July 2019. We followed the sepsis protocol used in the ED of a tertiary care hospital. Results: We enrolled 593 patients, with 55.9% in the complete Hour-1 Sepsis Bundle group. The 28-day mortality was 3.9% overall and no significant difference between the complete and incomplete Hour-1 Sepsis Bundle groups (3.6% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.707). Complete Hour-1 Sepsis Bundle treatment was not associated with 28-day mortality (adjusted OR = 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.72–5.74, P = 0.176) or delayed septic shock (adjusted OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.30–1.78, P = 0.499). Completion of each bundle did not affect outcomes of 28-day mortality and delayed septic shock. Conclusions: The complete Hour-1 Sepsis Bundle treatment in the ED was not significantly associated with 28-day mortality and delayed septic shock. Trial registration: The trial was registered in the Thai Clinical Trial Registry, TCTR 20200526013.

Introduction: Sepsis is a severe medical condition that can be life-threatening. If sepsis progresses to septic shock, the mortality rate increases to around 40%, much higher than the 10% mortality observed in sepsis. Diabetes increases infection and sepsis risk, making management complex. Various scores of screening tools, such as Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II), are used to predict the severity or mortality rate of disease. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness and optimal cutoff points of these scores. We focused on the early prediction of septic shock in patients with diabetes in the Emergency Department (ED). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to collect data on patients with diabetes. We collected prediction factors and MEWS, SOFA, SAPS II and APACHE II scores to predict septic shock in these patients. We determined the optimal cutoff points for each score. Subsequently, we compared the identified scores with the gold standard for diagnosing septic shock by applying the Sepsis-3 criteria. Results: Systolic blood pressure (SBP), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), pH, and lactate concentrations were significant predictors of septic shock (p < 0.001). The SOFA score performed well in predicting septic shock in patients with diabetes. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for the SOFA score was 0.866 for detection within 48 h and 0.840 for detection after 2 h of admission to the ED, with the optimal cutoff score of ≥ 6. Conclusion: SBP, SpO2, GCS, pH, and lactate concentrations are crucial for the early prediction of septic shock in patients with diabetes. The SOFA score is a superior predictor for the onset of septic shock in patients with diabetes compared with MEWS, SAPS II, and APACHE II scores. Specifically, a cutoff of ≥ 6 in the SOFA score demonstrates high accuracy in predicting shock within 48 h post-ED visit and as early as 2 h after ED admission.

The objective of this study was to determine the height of optimal hand position for chest compression during adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) from the tip of the sternal xiphoid process (TOX) along with the relative heights of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and abdominal organs among the Thai population. The retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted through a review of medical records and contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography. The total of 204 Thai patients without obvious chest deformity at Ramathibodi Hospital from January to June 2018 was included as part of a multi-regional study. The heights of the level of maximal LV width (LV_max), LOVT, top of liver and stomach with respect to TOX were measured on midline sagittal image. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 59.5 years and 23.9 kg/m², respectively. One hundred and one subjects (49.5%) had pulmonary diseases. Mean height of the LV_max from TOX was 37.7 mm, corresponding to 20% of the sternal length (SL) in the inspiration arm raised position (IAR). The adjusted height of LV_max from TOX in the expiration arm-down position (EAD) was 89.7 mm (48% of SL). The inter-nipple line was at 84.5 mm (45.1% of SL) from TOX on IAR. Among 178 and 109 subjects whose uppermost part of the liver and stomach were above TOX, 80.4% and 94.5% were located within the lower half of the sternum, respectively. The adjusted optimal hand position for chest compression during CPR was at approximately 89.7 mm from TOX in EAD (48% of SL). The hand position at the upper part of the lower half of the sternum is closest to the adjusted LV_max and has a better chance to avoid compression of intraabdominal organs.Trial registration This trial was retrospectively registered on 2 February 2023 in the Thai Clinical Trial Registry, identification number TCTR 20230202006.

Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide, and bystander CPR with public-access defibrillation improves OHCA survival outcomes. The COVID-19 pandemic has posed many challenges for emergency medical services (EMS), including the suggestion of compression-only resuscitation and recommendations for complete personal protective equipment, which have created operational difficulties and prolonged response time. However, the risk factors affecting OHCA outcomes during the pandemic are poorly defined. This study aimed to assess the characteristics and outcomes of OHCA patients before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study used data from electronic medical records and EMS paper records. All OHCA patients who visited Ramathibodi Hospital’s emergency department before COVID-19 (March 2018 to December 2019) and during COVID-19 (March 2020-December 2021) were identified, and the number of emergency department returns of spontaneous circulation (ED-ROSC) and characteristics in OHCA patients before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand were collected. Results: A total of 136 patients were included (78 men [59.1%]; mean [SD] age, 67.9 [18] years); 60 of these were during the COVID-19 period (beginning March 2020), and 76 were before the COVID-19 period. The overall baseline characteristics that differed significantly between the two groups were bystander witness and mode of chest compression (p-values < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). The ED ROSC during the COVID-19 period was significantly lower than before the COVID-19 period (26.67% vs. 46.05%, adjusted OR 0.21, p-value < 0.001). There were significant differences in survival to admission between the COVID-19 period and before (25.00% and 40.79%, adjusted OR 0.26, p-value 0.005). However, 30-day survivals were not significantly different (3.3% during the COVID-19 period and 10.53% before the COVID-19 period). Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand, ED ROSC and survival to admission in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients were significantly reduced. Additionally, the witness responses and mode of chest compression were very different between the two groups. Trial registration: This trial was retrospectively registered on 7 December 2021 in the Thai Clinical Trial Registry, identification number TCTR20211207006.

Background Administration of antibiotics to septic patients within 1 h was recommended in 2018 by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) as a strategy to improve survival outcomes. The use of sepsis screening tools in emergency departments (EDs) is important for early diagnosis and initiation of sepsis care. This study aimed to assess the impact of the Ramathibodi early warning score (REWs) on the administration of antibiotics within 1 h of presentation. Methods This was an observational retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching between the sepsis-3 criteria (pre-period) and the REWs (post-period) as screening tools in adult patients with sepsis in EDs. The primary outcome was the proportion of receiving antibiotics within 1 h of presentation in the pre- and post-periods. Results A total of 476 patients were analyzed without propensity matching. The proportion of antibiotic administration within 1 h was higher in patients screened using the REWs compared with standard of care in the total study population (79.5% vs. 61.4%, p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, 153 patients were included in both groups. The proportion of antibiotic administration within 1 h was similar in patients screened using the REWs and those receiving standard of care (79.7% vs. 80.4%, p = 0.886). However, time to intensive care unit (ICU) admission was faster in patients screened using the REWs. Delays in receiving antibiotics of longer than 3 h were associated with increased mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 7.04, 95% confidence interval 1.45 to 34.11, p = 0.015). Conclusions Implementing the REWs as a tool in sepsis screening protocols in EDs did not improve rates of antibiotic administration within 1 h as recommended by the SSC. However, time to ICU admission was improved after implementation of the REWs.