OBJECTIVE: This study aims to establish the effect of electromagnetic diathermy therapies (e.g., shortwave, microwave, capacitive resistive electric transfer) on pain, function, and quality of life in treating musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review according to the PRISMA statement and Cochrane Handbook 6.3. The protocol has been registered in PROSPERO: CRD42021239466. The search was conducted in PubMed, PEDro, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and CINAHL. RESULTS: We retrieved 13,323 records; 68 studies were included. Many pathologies were treated with diathermy against placebo, as a standalone intervention or alongside other therapies. Most of the pooled studies did not show significant improvements in the primary outcomes. While the analysis of single studies shows several significant results in favour of diathermy, all comparisons considered had a GRADE quality of evidence between low and very low. CONCLUSIONS: The included studies show controversial results. Most of the pooled studies present very low quality of evidence and no significant results, while single studies have significant results with a slightly higher quality of evidence (low), highlighting a critical lack of evidence in the field. The results did not support the adoption of diathermy in a clinical context, preferring therapies supported by evidence.

Subjects with Parkinson’s Disease (PD) display different motor and non-motor symptoms. Different therapies have been shown to be effective, such as plantar foot stimulation, which has proved to be effective for motor symptoms. Different stimulation methods were proposed and tested through specific devices, or insoles. Our aim was to assess the effect of a newly designed custom-made insole called PRO-STEP compared with a flat sham insole on subjects with PD. Subjects were randomized 1:1 into two arms and were asked to wear PRO-STEP or sham insoles for at least 6 h per day for 10 weeks. Participants were evaluated at four timepoints. Forty-two subjects were randomly assigned to the PRO-STEP (EG) or sham group (SG). The comparison of the EG and SG without and with insoles (T0–T1) did not show significant differences in the TUG time and in the 10MWT gait parameters. At T1, T2, and T3 TUG time, BBS, SF12-MC, and SF12-PC did not show significant differences. The satisfaction level with the PRO-STEP or sham insoles was high in both groups. PD patients were satisfied with PRO-STEP insoles; however, plantar foot stimulation is not effective from a functional perspective. Future studies should consider possible modifications to the proposed stimulation to improve its effectiveness in patients with PD.

Aim: Investigate the efficacy of physical therapy in the management of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) Methods: We conducted a systematic review on 3 databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. The applied methods are stated in the protocol and registered in OSF: 10.17605/OSF.IO/SF49B. Results: At the end of the screening process, 12 RCTs were included. Included studies presented heterogeneous and multicomponent interventions. Physical therapy interventions resulted valuable in the management of CRPS. Motor imagery and some physical agents therapies are effective in reducing pain and for functional improvements. Conclusion: Physiotherapy is a central treatment for patients with CRPS.

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the reliability of a qualitative scoring system based on the movement analysis of the spine in different populations and after usual care rehabilitative intervention. If proven true, the results could further future research development in quantitative indexes, leading to a possible subclassification of chronic low back pain (cLBP). Methods: This was a preliminary exploratory observational study. Data of an optoelectronic spine movement analysis from a pathological population (cLBP population, 5 male, 5 female, age 58 ± 16 years) were compared to young healthy participants (5M, 5F, age 22 ± 1) and were analysed via a new qualitative score of the pattern of movement. Internal consistency was calculated. Two independent assessors (experienced and inexperienced) assessed the blinded data, and we calculated inter- and intrarater reliability. We performed an analysis for cLBP pre and post a ten session group rehabilitation program between and within groups. Results: Internal consistency was good for all movements (α = 0.84–0.88). Intra-rater reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient–ICC) was excellent for overall scores of all movements (ICC_(1,k) = 0.95–0.99), while inter-rater reliability was poor to moderate (ICC_(1,k) = 0.39–0.78). We found a significant difference in the total movement scores between cLBP and healthy participants (p = 0.001). Within-group comparison (cLBP) showed no significant difference in the total movement score in pre and post-treatment. Conclusion: The perception of differences between normal and pathological movements has been confirmed through the proposed scoring system, which proved to be able to distinguish different populations. This study has many limitations, but these results show that movement analysis could be a useful tool and open the door to quantifying the identified parameters through future studies.

Background: Physiotherapy plays a key role in managing fibromyalgia, a multifaceted disorder, through a combination of active and passive treatments. The purpose of this review is to compare the efficacy of “hands-off” treatments alone versus the combination of “hands-off” and “hands-on” therapies. Methods: MEDLINE (PubMed), CENTRAL, and Embase were searched. English-language randomized controlled trials involving adults with fibromyalgia were included. The included studies were divided into subgroups to reduce the possible heterogeneity. We calculated the standardized mean difference or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals for the continuous data according to the outcome measures. We used the risk ratio for dichotomous data of the drop-out rate of the studies. Results: We included and analyzed seven RCTs. The meta-analysis showed no significant results in the outcomes, pain, QoL, health status, and drop-out rate. We found significant results (p < 0.001) in favor of combining “hands-off” and “hands-on” treatments for the rest quality (SMD 0.72, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.09). Conclusions: This review increases the treatment options available for clinicians. Up to now, the main guidelines on managing fibromyalgia suggest only approaches based on “hands-off” treatments. These findings suggest that other approaches based on mixed interventions combining “hands-off” and “hands-on” treatments did not reduce the patient outcomes. Moreover, the mixed intervention led to better results for the patients’ sleep quality than the “hands-off” treatments alone.

This study aims to develop a new methodology for assessing postural transitions, such as sit-to-stand movements, and to preliminarily apply it in a clinical setting. These movements provide valuable information about the state of movement effector system components, whether musculoskeletal, nervous, or cognitive, and their evaluation is a key point in the functional assessment in the clinical setting of patients with complex rehabilitative needs. The objective of this study was developed by pursuing three goals: verifying the ability to discriminate between healthy and pathological subjects, defining a set of parameters for movement assessment, and thus designing a preliminary evaluation paradigm for future clinical applications. We investigated the signals from a single IMU sensor applied to subjects (20 healthy and 13 patients) performing five different postural transitions. A set of six kinematic variables that allowed a quantitative assessment of motion was identified, namely total time, smoothness, fluency, velocity, jerk root mean square, and maximum jerk variation. At the end of the study, the adopted methodology and set of parameters were shown to be able to quantitatively assess postural transitions in a clinical context and to be able to distinguish healthy subjects from pathological subjects. This, together with future studies, will provide researchers and clinicians with a valuable resource for evaluating the results of a rehabilitation program, as well as for keeping track of patients’ functional status in follow-up evaluations.