Microplastics and nanoplastics (MNPs) are becoming an increasingly severe global problem due to their widespread distribution and complex impact on living organisms. Apart from their environmental impact, the effects of MNPs on living organisms have also continued to attract attention. The harmful impact of MNPs has been extensively documented in marine invertebrates and larger marine vertebrates like fish. However, the research on the toxicity of these particles on mammals is still limited, and their possible effects on humans are poorly understood. Considering that MNPs are commonly found in food or food packaging, humans are primarily exposed to them through ingestion. It would be valuable to investigate the potential harmful effects of these particles on gut health. This review focuses on recent research exploring the toxicological impacts of micro- and nanoplastics on the gut, as observed in human cell lines and mammalian models. Available data from various studies indicate that the accumulation of MNPs in mammalian models and human cells may result in adverse consequences, in terms of epithelial toxicity, immune toxicity, and the disruption of the gut microbiota. The paper also discusses the current research limitations and prospects in this field, aiming to provide a scientific basis and reference for further studies on the toxic mechanisms of micro- and nanoplastics.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are intricate systemic conditions that can extend beyond the gastrointestinal tract through both direct and indirect mechanisms. Sarcopenia, characterized by a reduction in muscle mass and strength, often emerges as a consequence of the clinical course of IBDs. Indeed, sarcopenia exhibits a high prevalence in Crohn’s disease (52%) and ulcerative colitis (37%). While computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging remain gold-standard methods for assessing muscle mass, ultrasound is gaining traction as a reliable, cost-effective, and widely available diagnostic method. Muscle strength serves as a key indicator of muscle function, with grip strength test emerging nowadays as the most reliable assessment method. In IBDs, sarcopenia may arise from factors such as inflammation, malnutrition, and gut dysbiosis, leading to the formulation of the ‘gut–muscle axis’ hypothesis. This condition determines an increased need for surgery with poorer post-surgical outcomes and a reduced response to biological treatments. Sarcopenia and its consequences lead to reduced quality of life (QoL), in addition to the already impaired QoL. Of emerging concern is sarcopenic obesity in IBDs, a challenging condition whose pathogenesis and management are still poorly understood. Resistance exercise and nutritional interventions, particularly those aimed at augmenting protein intake, have demonstrated efficacy in addressing sarcopenia in IBDs. Furthermore, anti-TNF biological therapies showed interesting outcomes in managing this condition. This review seeks to furnish a comprehensive overview of sarcopenia in IBDs, elucidating diagnostic methodologies, pathophysiological mechanisms, and clinical implications and management. Attention will also be paid to sarcopenic obesity, exploring the pathophysiology and possible treatment modalities of this condition.

Malnutrition poses a critical challenge in inflammatory bowel disease, with the potential to detrimentally impact medical treatment, surgical outcomes, and general well-being. Parenteral nutrition is crucial in certain clinical scenarios, such as with patients suffering from short bowel syndrome, intestinal insufficiency, high-yielding gastrointestinal fistula, or complete small bowel obstruction, to effectively manage malnutrition. Nevertheless, research over the years has attempted to define the potential effects of parenteral nutrition on the intestinal barrier and the composition of the gut microbiota. In this narrative review, we have gathered and analyzed findings from both preclinical and clinical studies on this topic. Based on existing evidence, there is a clear correlation between short- and long-term parenteral nutrition and negative effects on the intestinal system. These include mucosal atrophic damage and immunological and neuroendocrine dysregulation, as well as alterations in gut barrier permeability and microbiota composition. However, the mechanistic role of these changes in inflammatory bowel disease remains unclear. Therefore, further research is necessary to effectively address the numerous gaps and unanswered questions pertaining to these issues.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an acute inflammation of the pancreas caused by the activation of digestive enzymes in the pancreatic tissue. The main causes of AP are cholelithiasis and alcohol abuse; less commonly, it can be caused by drugs, with a prevalence of up to 5%. Causal associations between drugs and pancreatitis are largely based on case reports or case series with limited evidence. We reviewed the available data on drug-induced AP, focusing on antimicrobial drugs and antivirals, and discussed the current evidence in relation to the classification systems available in the literature. We found 51 suspected associations between antimicrobial and antiviral drugs and AP. The drugs with the most evidence of correlation are didanosine, protease inhibitors, and metronidazole. In addition, other drugs have been described in case reports demonstrating positive rechallenge. However, there are major differences between the various classifications available, where the same drug being assigned to different probability classes. It is likely that the presence in multiple case reports of an association between acute pancreatitis and a drug should serve as a basis for conducting prospective randomized controlled trials to improve the quality of the evidence.

This scoping review aims to map the existing literature on nutritional knowledge among people with IBD, identify gaps in current understanding, and provide guidance for future educational interventions. Background: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic conditions affecting the gastrointestinal tract, where nutrition plays a crucial role in symptom management. Despite its significance, patient knowledge about proper dietary practices remains limited, with widespread misconceptions potentially leading to suboptimal health outcomes. Methods: This review followed the Arksey and O’Malley framework and adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS) for studies published between 2003 and 2024. Only studies involving adults (≥18 years) with IBD and focusing on nutritional knowledge were included. Results: From 1440 records initially identified, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings highlight that IBD patients often base dietary decisions on personal beliefs rather than evidence-based guidelines, leading to widespread food avoidance and increased risk of malnutrition. Misconceptions such as avoiding dairy, gluten, and fiber without professional advice were prevalent. Educational interventions, including personalized counseling and group sessions, showed the potential to improve nutritional knowledge and symptom management, though their application remains inconsistent across settings. Conclusions: IBD patients face significant gaps in nutritional knowledge, emphasizing the need for structured educational initiatives. A personalized, multidisciplinary approach, integrating dietary education into standard care, is essential to improve symptom control and enhance quality of life. Future research should focus on developing evidence-based interventions tailored to the unique needs of this population.

Short bowel syndrome (SBS), usually resulting from massive small bowel resections or congenital defects, may lead to intestinal failure (IF), requiring intravenous fluids and parenteral nutrition to preserve patients’ nutritional status. Approximately 15% to 40% of subjects with SBS and IF develop chronic hepatic damage during their life, a condition referred to as intestinal-failure-associated liver disease (IFALD), which ranges from steatosis to fibrosis or end-stage liver disease. Parenteral nutrition has been largely pointed out as the main pathogenetic factor for IFALD. However, other elements, such as inflammation, bile acid metabolism, bacterial overgrowth and gut dysbiosis also contribute to the development of liver damage and may deserve specific treatment strategies. Indeed, in our review, we aim to explore IFALD pathogenesis beyond parenteral nutrition. By critically analyzing recent literature, we seek to delve with molecular mechanisms and metabolic pathways underlying liver damage in such a complex set of patients.