Our study was aimed to explore the clinical implication of chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) in genetically etiological diagnosis of children with congenital heart disease (CHD). A total of 104 children with CHD with or without multiple congenital anomalies (MCA) or intellectual disabilities/developmental delay (ID/DD) but normal karyotype were investigated using Affymetrix CytoScan HD array. Pathogenic copy number variations (PCNVs) were identified in 29 children (27.9%). The detection rates in children with simple CHD and complex CHD were 31.1% (19/61) and 23.2% (10/43), respectively. The detection rates of PCNVs were 17.9% (7/39), 20% (5/25), 63.2% (12/19) and 23.8% (5/21) in isolated CHD, CHD plus MCA, CHD plus ID/DD, CHD plus MCA and ID/DD, respectively. The PCNVs rate of CHD plus ID/DD was significantly higher than that of isolated CHD. Two genomic loci including 15q11.2 deletion and 1q43-q44 deletion were considered as CHD locus. The DVL1, SKI, STIM1, CTNNA3 and PLN were identified as candidate genes associated with CHD phenotypes. CMA can increase the diagnostic rate and improve the etiological diagnosis in children with CHD. We suggest CMA as a first-tier test in children with CHD, especially in children with CHD plus ID/DD.

Background: There are few studies on the detection rate by chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) of the prenatal diagnosis of talipes equinovarus (TE) compared to conventional karyotyping. We aimed to explore the molecular etiology of fetal TE and examine the detection rate by CMA, which provides more information for the clinical screening and genetic counseling of TE. Methods: In this retrospective study, pregnancies diagnosed with fetal TE were enrolled and clinical data for all cases were retrieved from our medical record database, including demographic data for pregnancies, ultrasound findings, karyotype/CMA results, and pregnant and perinatal outcomes. Results: Among the 164 patients, 17 (10.4%) clinically significant variants were detected by CMA. In 148 singleton pregnancies, the diagnostic rate of clinically significant variants was significantly higher in the non-isolated TE group than in the isolated TE group (10/37, 27.0% vs. 6/111, 5.4%, P < 0.001). In twin pregnancies, 1 (6.3%) pathogenic copy number variant was present in the other 16 twin pregnancies. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that CMA is useful for the prenatal genetic diagnosis of fetal TE. Fetal TE with the associated structural malformation correlates with a higher probability of clinically significant variants. This data may aid prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling for fetal TE.

(1) Purpose: Retrospective back-to-back comparisons were performed to evaluate the accuracy, effectiveness, and incremental yield of chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) and exome sequencing (ES) analysis in fetuses with digestive system malformations (DSMs). (2) Methods: In total, 595 women with fetal DSMs who underwent prenatal diagnosis were enrolled. We analyzed the diagnostic yields of CMA and ES and evaluated pregnancy outcomes. Copy number variants (CNVs) were classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. (3) Results: Pathogenic CNVs were detected in 11/517 (2.12%) fetuses, and variants of unknown significance (VUS) were identified in 69 (13.35%) fetuses using CMA. ES detected 29 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in 23/143 (16.08%) fetuses and 26/143 (18.2%) VUS. In those with other ultrasound abnormalities, the detection rate of multiple system structural malformations was 41.2%, followed by skeletal (33.3%), cardiovascular (25.4%), and central nervous system (18.6%) malformations. Of the 391 surviving children, 40 (10.2%) exhibited varying degrees of mental retardation. (4) Conclusion: A correlation exists between DSMs and chromosomal abnormalities. When combined with other systemic abnormalities, the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities increases significantly. Patients with congenital DSM are at risk of developing neurodevelopmental disorders. Combined CMA and ES detection of fetal DSM has good clinical application potential.

Background: There are few studies on the burden of chromosomal abnormalities and single gene disorders in fetal hemivertebra (HV). We aim to investigate the cytogenetic and monogenic risk and evaluate prenatal outcomes of fetal HV. Method: This study included fetuses diagnosed with HV divided into two groups: isolated HV and non-isolated HV. Data on other sonographic structural anomalies, chromosomal and sub-chromosomal abnormalities, monogenic variations detected by WES, and prenatal outcomes are recorded and reviewed. Results: Among 109 fetal HV cases, forty-seven (43.1%) non-isolated HV cases were associated with structural anomalies. Chromosomal test results were available in 58 cases, identifying six (10.3%) chromosomal aberrations involved in four isolated and two non-isolated HV. WES identified four (likely) pathogenic variants in three cases among 16 fetuses with HV, involving three novel variants, 1250G > T and c.1277G> inherited from parents, respectively, in DLL3 and c.7213C > A ** in the FLNB. The live birth rate (LB) was higher in the isolated fetal HV group than in the non-isolated group (67.7% (42/62) vs. 12.5% (12/47), p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study emphasizes the risk of cytogenetic abnormalities in isolated HV. WES yields a diagnostic rate of 18.3% in HV with normal CMA, probably aiding the prenatal counseling and management of fetal HV.

Currently, there are still many challenges in prenatal diagnosis, such as limited or uncertain fetal phenotyping, variant interpretation, and rapid turnaround times. The aim of this study was to illustrate the value of a comprehensive genomic evaluation in prenatal diagnosis. We retrospectively reviewed 20 fetuses with clinically significant copy number variants (CNVs) detected by chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and no further exome sequencing testing in our tertiary center between 2019 and 2020. The residual DNA from the prenatal cases was used for the parallel implementation of CNV sequencing (CNV-seq) and trio-based clinical exome sequencing (trio-CES). CMA revealed 26 clinically significant CNVs (18 deletions and eight duplications) in 20 fetuses, in which five fetuses had two or more CNVs. There were eight fetuses with pathogenic CNVs (e.g., del 1p36), nine fetuses with likely pathogenic CNVs (e.g., dup 22q11.21), and three fetuses with variants of unknown significance (VOUS, e.g., dup 1q21.1q21.2). Trio-CES identified four fetuses with likely pathogenic mutations (SNV/InDels). Of note, a fetus was detected with a maternally inherited hemizygous variant in the SLX4 gene due to a 16p13.3 deletion on the paternal chromosome. The sizes of CNVs detected by CNV-seq were slightly larger than that of the SNP array, and four cases with mosaic CNVs were all identified by CNV-seq. In conclusion, microdeletion/duplication syndromes and monogenic disorders may co-exist in a subject, and CNV deletion may contribute to uncovering additional recessive disease alleles. The application of a comprehensive genomic evaluation (CNVs and SNV/InDels) has great value in the prenatal diagnosis arena. CNV-seq based on NGS technology is a reliable and a cost-effective technique for identifying CNVs.