Fifth metatarsal base fractures of the metaphyseal-diaphyseal watershed junction (Jones fracture) are commonly treated with surgical fixation in athletes. Intramedullary screw fixation remains the most utilized construct, although plantar-lateral plating is an alternative. The purpose was to compare the mechanical strength of fracture fixation between an intramedullary screw and plantar-lateral plating. The hypothesis was that plantar-lateral plate fixation would allow for more cycles and higher peak loads before failure, as well as less fracture gapping, than would an intramedullary screw in cadaveric foot specimens with simulated Jones fractures exposed to cantilever bending. Controlled laboratory study. Twelve pairs of male cadaver feet were separated into 2 groups (plate or screw) to conduct contralateral comparative testing of 2 devices with equally numbered right and left feet. For each fifth metatarsal, an osteotomy with a microsagittal saw was created to simulate a Jones fracture. The plate group underwent fixation with a 3.0-mm 4-hole low-profile titanium plate placed plantar-laterally with 3 locking screws and 1 nonlocking screw. The screw group underwent fixation with a 40- or 45-mm × 5.5-mm partially threaded solid titanium intramedullary screw. After fixation, the metatarsals were excised for biomechanical testing. Cyclic cantilever failure testing was conducted with a gradient-cycle method. Sinusoidal loading forces were applied, increasing by 5.0-pound-force increments per 10 cycles, until each specimen experienced mechanical failure of implant or bone. Failure mode, number of cycles to failure, peak failure load, gap width at the last mutual prefailure loading, and video data were recorded. Paired 2-tailed t test (α = 0.05) was used to compare groups (P < .05 set for significance). Failure mode in both groups occurred predominantly at the bone-implant interface. Plate fixation resulted in significantly higher mean ± SD values for cycles to failure (63.9 ± 27.0 vs 37.3 ± 36.9, P = .01) and peak failure load (159.2 ± 60.5 N vs 96.5 ± 45.8 N, P = .01), with a significantly lower mean gap width (0.0 ± 0.0 mm vs 3.2 ± 2.4 mm, P < .01). As compared with intramedullary screw fixation, plantar-lateral plating allowed for greater cycles to failure and peak load before failure, as well as less gap width, when applied to cadaver foot specimens with simulated Jones fractures exposed to cantilever bending in a load frame. Early return to play among athletes before Jones fracture union is associated with increased risk of failure. This study introduces a plantar-lateral plating construct that performed more favorably than intramedullary screw fixation when applied to simulated Jones fractures in cadaveric foot specimens. Further clinical comparative studies are needed to assess the clinical use of this construct.

Inactivity following injury and surgery due to pain, instability, or immobilization results in loss of muscle mass and function. As a result, both risk of reinjury and overall recovery time are a prime concern for clinicians and therapists trying to minimize these deleterious effects. While resistance exercise has been demonstrated to be highly effective in combating loss of muscle mass and function, it is often not advised for postoperative or injured patients because of elevated risk of injury or exacerbating existing injury sites. Low-intensity resistance exercise (<30% 1 repetition-maximum) performed with mild to moderate blood flow restriction (BFR) has been observed to elicit beneficial anabolic and functional responses in skeletal muscle that are governed by mechanisms that regulate muscle protein metabolism and myogenesis similar to the responses following high-intensity resistance exercise. On the basis of these findings, practical applications of BFR in clinical and sport settings have been developed to mitigate skeletal muscle loss following injury and accelerate rehabilitation. However, many aspects of the physiological effects of BFR therapy in rehabilitation settings remain unclear. This review provides current information regarding skeletal muscle responses to BFR with a focus on skeletal muscle protein metabolism, anabolic signaling, applied outcomes, and applications in the clinical setting.

Decreased mechanical loading after orthopaedic surgery predisposes patients to develop muscle atrophy. The purpose of this review was to assess whether the evidence supports oral protein supplementation can help decrease postoperative muscle atrophy and/or improve patient outcomes following orthopaedic surgery. A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials that assessed protein or amino acid supplementation in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Two investigators independently conducted the search using relevant Boolean operations. Primary outcomes included functional or physiologic measures of muscle atrophy or strength. Fourteen studies including 611 patients (224 males, 387 females) were analyzed. Three studies evaluated protein supplementation after ACL reconstruction (ACLR), 3 after total hip arthroplasty (THA), 5 after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and 3 after surgical treatment of hip fracture. Protein supplementation showed beneficial effects across all types of surgery. The primary benefit was a decrease in muscle atrophy compared to placebo as measured by muscle cross sectional area. Multiple authors also demonstrated improved functional measures and quicker achievement of rehabilitation benchmarks. Protein supplementation has beneficial effects on mitigating muscle atrophy in the postoperative period following ACLR, THA, TKA, and surgical treatment of hip fracture. These effects often correlate with improved functional measures and quicker achievement of rehabilitation benchmarks. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term effects of protein supplementation and to establish standardized population-specific regimens that maximize treatment efficacy in the postoperative period.

The purpose of this study was to develop an equation to predict strength for seven common resistance training exercises using anthropometric and demographic measures. One-hundred forty-seven healthy adults (74 males, 73 females, 35 ± 12 yr, 174 ± 10 cm, 88 ± 19 kg) volunteered to participate. Body composition values (regional/total) and body dimensions were assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Subjects underwent the following maximal strength assessments: Leg Press, Chest Press, Leg Curl, Lat Pulldown, Leg Extension, Triceps Pushdown, and Biceps Curl. Multiple linear regression with stepwise removal was used to determine the best model to predict maximal strength for each exercise. Independent predictor variables identified (p < 0.05) were height (cm); weight (kg); BMI; age; sex (0 = F,1 = M); regional lean masses (LM,kg); fat mass (FM,kg); fat free mass (FFM,kg); percent fat (%BF); arm, leg, and trunk lengths (AL, LL, TL; cm); and shoulder width (SW,cm). Analyses were performed with and without regional measures to accommodate scenarios where DEXA is unavailable. All models presented were significant (p < 0.05, R² = 0.68–0.83), with regional models producing the greatest accuracy. Results indicate that maximal strength for individual resistance exercises can be reasonably estimated in adults.

Purpose: To assess the utility of a validated wearable device (VWD) in examining preoperative and postoperative sleep patterns and how these data compare to patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) after rotator cuff repair (RCR) or total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Methods: Male and female adult patients undergoing either RCR or TSA were followed up from 34 days preoperatively to 6 weeks postoperatively. Sleep metrics were collected using a VWD in an unsupervised setting. PROs were assessed using the following validated outcome measures: Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function questionnaire; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons self‐evaluation questionnaire; visual analog scale assessing pain; and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire. Data were analyzed preoperatively and at 2‐week intervals postoperatively with χ ² analysis to evaluate device compliance. Sleep metrics and PROs were evaluated at each interval relative to preoperative values within each surgery type with an analysis of variance repeated on time point. The relation between sleep metrics and PROs was assessed with correlation analysis. Results: A total of 57 patients were included, 37 in the RCR group and 20 in the TSA group. The rate of device compliance in the RCR group decreased from 84% at surgery to 46% by 6 weeks postoperatively ( P < .001). Similarly, the rate of device compliance in the TSA group decreased from 81% to 52% ( P < .001). Deep sleep decreased in RCR patients at 2 to 4 weeks (decrease by 10.99 ± 3.96 minutes, P = .021) and 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively (decrease by 13.37 ± 4.08 minutes, P = .008). TSA patients showed decreased deep sleep at 0 to 2 weeks postoperatively (decrease by 12.91 ± 5.62 minutes, P = .045) and increased rapid eye movement sleep at 2 to 4 weeks postoperatively (increase by 26.91 ± 10.70 minutes, P = .031). Rapid eye movement sleep in the RCR group and total sleep in the TSA group were positively correlated with more favorable PROs ( P < .05). Conclusions: VWDs allow for monitoring components of sleep that offer insight into potential targets for improving postoperative fatigue, pain, and overall recovery after shoulder surgery. However, population demographic factors and ease of device use are barriers to optimized patient compliance during data collection. Level of Evidence: Level IV, diagnostic case series.