Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α) is a transcription factor that regulates the cellular response to hypoxia and is upregulated in all types of solid tumor, leading to tumor angiogenesis, growth, and resistance to therapy. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly vascular tumor, as well as a hypoxic tumor, due to the liver being a relatively hypoxic environment compared to other organs. Trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and trans-arterial embolization (TAE) are locoregional therapies that are part of the treatment guidelines for HCC but can also exacerbate hypoxia in tumors, as seen with HIF-1α upregulation post-hepatic embolization. Hypoxia-activated prodrugs (HAPs) are a novel class of anticancer agent that are selectively activated under hypoxic conditions, potentially allowing for the targeted treatment of hypoxic HCC. Early studies targeting hypoxia show promising results; however, further research is needed to understand the effects of HAPs in combination with embolization in the treatment of HCC. This review aims to summarize current knowledge on the role of hypoxia and HIF-1α in HCC, as well as the potential of HAPs and liver-directed embolization.

Purpose: Early characterization of small (T1a, < 4 cm) renal masses is imperative for patient care and treatment planning. Renal biopsy is a sensitive and specific procedure that can accurately differentiate small renal masses as malignant or benign. However, it is an invasive procedure with a non-negligible complication rate and is not performed routinely at most institutions. In this study, we sought to apply the Re-VASC scoring system to T1a renal masses and analyzed whether it could differentiate these masses as benign or malignant. Methods: We obtained Institutional Review Board approval to retrospectively examine the records of all patients who presented to our single, urban academic referral center for surgical treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). For the malignant group, patients with a diagnosis of T1a RCC from pathologic evaluation were included. Additionally, patients with a histopathological diagnosis of a T1a non-malignant renal mass (fat poor-angiomyolipoma or oncocytoma) were included in our benign group. Results: This study includes 57 benign and 69 malignant T1a renal tumors. Average size for benign and malignant masses were 2.47 and 2.63 respectively (p=0.267). Analysis demonstrated no significant difference between both groups in terms of sex, laterality, or size. The average Re-VASC score of benign and malignant masses was 0.175 and malignant masses was 0.784 respectively (p<0.001). Additionally, the Re-VASC score was independently associated with malignancy with an odds ratio of 2.223 (p=0.0109). Conclusion: The Re-VASC scoring system exhibits significantly greater values for malignant T1a renal masses when compared to benign masses. As a result, it shows promise as an adjunctive tool to renal biopsy for clinical decision-making. Further assessment of Re-VASC’s true efficacy as a diagnostic marker will include prospective evaluation of a larger multicenter population.