Xingqiang Song

Dr. Xingqiang Song


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2018 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JDJiangyu Dai
Jiangyu Dai
SWShiqiang Wu
Shiqiang Wu
GHGuoyi Han
Guoyi Han
JWJosh Weinberg
Josh Weinberg
XXXinghua Xie
Xinghua Xie
QYQianqian Yang
Qianqian Yang

1 October 2017 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XSXingqiang Song
Xingqiang Song
JPJohan Berg Pettersen
Johan Berg Pettersen
KPKristine Bondo Pedersen
Kristine Bondo Pedersen
SRStian Røberg
Stian Røberg

1 April 2019 in Journal of Industrial Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XSXingqiang Song
Xingqiang Song
YLYing Liu
Ying Liu
JPJohan Berg Pettersen
Johan Berg Pettersen
Miguel BrandãoMiguel Brandão
Miguel Brandão
XMXiaona Ma
Xiaona Ma
BFBjörn Frostell
Björn Frostell

14 September 2012 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XSXingqiang Song
Xingqiang Song
BFBjörn Frostell
Björn Frostell
Without monitoring anthropogenic pressures on the water environment, it is difficult to set realistic river restoration targets in relation to water quality. Therefore a more holistic approach is needed to systematically explore the links between socio-economic drivers and observed water quality-related impacts on river ecosystems. Using the DPSIR (Drivers-Pressures-State of the Environment-Impacts-Responses) framework, this study linked ecological river restoration with the socio-economic sector, with the focus on promoting a pressure-oriented water quality monitoring system. Based on the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) and relevant literature, it was found that most water quality-related indicators employed today are state/impacts-oriented, while very few are pressure-oriented. As a response, we call for more attention to a DPR (Drivers-Pressures-Responses) framework in developing an industrial ecology-based pressure-oriented water quality monitoring system for aiding ecological river restoration planning. This approach is characterized in general by accounting for material-related flows throughout the socio-economic sector in relation to river ecosystem degradation. Then the obtained information would help decision makers take appropriate measures to alleviate various significant human-induced wastes and emissions at their sources. We believe that such a pressure-oriented monitoring system will substantially complement traditional state/impacts-oriented environmental and ecological monitoring and help develop more proactive planning and decision-making processes for specific river restoration projects and general water quality management.


1 January 2010 in Water Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XSXingqiang Song
Xingqiang Song
WRW. Ravesteijn
W. Ravesteijn
BFB. Frostell
B. Frostell
Ronald WennerstenRonald Wennersten
Ronald Wennersten
The emerging water crisis in China shows that the current institutional frameworks and policies with regard to water resources management are incapable of achieving an effective and satisfactory situation that includes Integrated River Basin Management (IRBM). This paper analyses this framework and related policies, examines their deficiencies in relation to all water stress problems and explores alternatives focusing on river basins. Water resources management reforms in modern China are reviewed and the main problems involved in transforming the current river management system into an IRBM-based system are analysed. The Huai River basin is used as an example of current river basin management, with quantitative data serving to show the scale and scope of the problems in the country as a whole. The institutional reforms required are discussed and a conceptual institutional framework is proposed to facilitate the implementation of IRBM in China. In particular, the roles, power and responsibilities of River Basin Commissions (RBCs) should be legally strengthened; the functions of supervising, decision-making and execution should be separated; and cross-sectoral legislation, institutional coordination and public participation at all levels should be promoted.