19 August 2015 in Current Medicinal Chemistry
AGAntonios N. Gargalionis
Hyperlipidemia is characterized by abnormally increased plasma of any or all lipids and /or lipoproteins and is a confirmed risk factor for the formation of atherosclerosis. Inflammation plays a crucial role in the formation and progression of atherosclerosis and consequently on cardiovascular diseases. Nowadays, the effective role of the immune system and subsequently of systemic inflammation is well established. Multiple levels of evidence from experimental models and histopathologic assessment of tissues to systemic biomarkers and epidemiologic or clinical associations have revealed that inflammation is one of the basic mechanisms in the destabilization of the atherogenetic plaque which leads to clinical events. Several inflammatory markers are affiliated with lipids level and the process of atherosclerosis. The most known of them are interleukin 6 and interleukin 1β, C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, pentraxin3, serum amyloid A, sCD40, adhesion molecules, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, sEndoglin, PAPP-A, chemokine 16, insulin like growth factor, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 and galectin 3 but their role in atherogenesis is not well established for all of them. As atheromatosis is one of the main causes of death all over the world, in upcoming studies it will be useful to specify the exact role of these markers in this process in order to have a better prognosis, diagnosis and understanding of this disorder. The aim in this review is to study the literature on the novel inflammation markers of hyperlipidemia according to their clinical implications.
13 May 2018 in Journal of International Medical Research
Objective: Osteonectin plays a central role in various processes during the development of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This prospective pilot study was performed to determine the feasibility of serum osteonectin as a screening tool for pancreatic cancer. Methods: Blood samples were collected from 15 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer and 30 matched healthy controls. Serum osteonectin was measured using an osteonectin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. The primary outcomes were the diagnostic performance of serum osteonectin and the threshold value for differentiation of patients from controls. Results: The median/quartile range of serum osteonectin in patients and controls were 306.8/288.5 ng/mL and 67.5/39.8 ng/mL, respectively. Osteonectin concentrations significantly differed among the study groups. A plasma osteonectin concentration of >100.18 ng/mL as selected by the receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrated an estimated area under the curve of 86% for prediction of pancreatic cancer. Tumour size was a significant predictor of serum osteonectin. A statistically significant difference in serum osteonectin between T1/T2 and T3/T4 tumours was found. Post-hoc comparisons revealed statistically significant differences in the serum osteonectin among the control, T1/T2, and T3/T4 groups. Conclusion: Osteonectin may be used as a screening tool for pancreatic cancer, although this must be validated in prospective studies.