Extensive research has shown that noise has detrimental effects on learning in classrooms, yet schools remain noisy environments. In addition, little is known about the students’ insight into their subjective reaction to noise. Students’ awareness of noise, as well as their perception of its effects on their affective and bodily states, remain unanswered. In the current study, the self-reported experience of noise and reaction towards noise, which was collected by way of a questionnaire, was assessed for 408 students in primary and secondary schools in Québec. Results suggest that about half of the students experience affective and bodily reactions to noise, and students who report having a negative affective reaction to noise are also more prone to report feeling this noise in their bodies. The results of this study offer a comprehensive picture of the students’ subjective (affective and bodily) state in relation to noise in schools.

Nonverbal intelligence has been linked to language impairments and adaptational outcomes in clinical populations. However, the development of nonverbal intelligence in conjunction with language difficulties is still poorly understood. This study aims to characterize the progression of nonverbal intelligence in young children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD). This study collected data from medical records of children seen in a child psychiatric clinic. The sample consisted of 71 children diagnosed with DLD who had completed two Wechsler scale assessments. The first assessment took place at the mean age of 4:11 years, and the second at the mean age of 8:2 years. Three groups were formed according to the evolution of nonverbal intelligence: decrease (n = 22), increase (n = 21), and stability (n = 28). Multivariate analyses of covariance indicated that initial verbal and nonverbal intellectual skills, multilingualism, and age distinguished these three groups and effects were medium to large. Children in the increasing path are significantly younger and have significantly lower initial verbal and nonverbal intellectual skills. Evolution of nonverbal development in children with DLD seems highly variable. More studies are needed, but very young children with DLD may not be able to demonstrate their full intellectual potential in standardized Weschler assessments. It would be advisable to continue to follow the evolution of their abilities with caution to personalize interventions. Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) is a diagnosis directly related to expressive and receptive language difficulties. Therefore, assessment and intervention are focused on verbal and language ability. Children with DLD also seem to have nonverbal cognitive weaknesses, but the understanding of nonverbal development in this population is limited. Among school-aged children, a great deal of variation in nonverbal abilities according to age is observed, possibly linked to the type of assessment used. Nonverbal intelligence has been related to functional outcomes in children, adolescents, and adults with DLD, thus warranting further investigation. This paper explores different nonverbal intelligence developmental evolutions of children from diverse ethnic groups, ensuring representation from large urban areas, and the clinical factors related to those trajectories. Three developmental profiles were differentiated: increase (29.6 %), stability (39.4 %), and decrease (31 %), which were distinguished by initial verbal and nonverbal intelligence as well as age. Having weaker verbal and nonverbal intelligence and being younger were associated with increasing nonverbal intelligence between the two time points. Development of nonverbal intelligence seems highly variable among preschoolers diagnosed with DLD who consulted in a clinical setting, with children being just as likely to improve, maintain, or decrease in ability. These findings may also indicate that nonverbal intelligence assessments may not capture the true nonverbal potential of younger children with DLD, especially when they show an array of difficulties. More research is needed to understand the different trajectories of nonverbal development, but current results encourage caution in the intellectual assessments of children with DLD.