We studied the use of self-attention mechanism networks (SAN) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for forest tree species classification using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing imagery in Dongtai Forest Farm, Jiangsu Province, China. We trained and validated representative CNN models, such as ResNet and ConvNeXt, as well as the SAN model, which incorporates Transformer models such as Swin Transformer and Vision Transformer (ViT). Our goal was to compare and evaluate the performance and accuracy of these networks when used in parallel. Due to various factors, such as noise, motion blur, and atmospheric scattering, the quality of low-altitude aerial images may be compromised, resulting in indistinct tree crown edges and deficient texture. To address these issues, we adopted Real-ESRGAN technology for image super-resolution reconstruction. Our results showed that the image dataset after reconstruction improved classification accuracy for both the CNN and Transformer models. The final classification accuracies, validated by ResNet, ConvNeXt, ViT, and Swin Transformer, were 96.71%, 98.70%, 97.88%, and 98.59%, respectively, with corresponding improvements of 1.39%, 1.53%, 0.47%, and 1.18%. Our study highlights the potential benefits of Transformer and CNN for forest tree species classification and the importance of addressing the image quality degradation issues in low-altitude aerial images.

Understanding the biodiversity–productivity relationship (BPR) is crucial for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem management. While it is known that diversity enhances forest productivity, the underlying mechanisms at the local neighborhood level remain poorly understood. We established a 9.6 ha dynamic forest plot to study how neighborhood diversity, intraspecific competition, and interspecific competition influence tree growth across spatial scales using linear mixed-effects models. Our analysis reveals a significant positive correlation between neighborhood species richness (NSR) and relative growth rate (RGR). Notably, intraspecific competition, measured by conspecific neighborhood density and resource competition, negatively impacts RGR at finer scales, indicating intense competition among conspecifics for limited resources. In contrast, interspecific competition, measured by heterospecific density and resource competition, has a negligible impact on RGR. The relative importance of diversity and intra/interspecific competition in influencing tree growth varies with scale. At fine scales, intraspecific competition dominates negatively, while at larger scales, the positive effect of NSR on RGR increases, contributing to a positive BPR. These findings highlight the intricate interplay between local interactions and spatial scale in modulating tree growth, emphasizing the importance of considering biotic interactions and spatial variability in studying BPR.