Yinzeng 刘印增 Liu

Mr. Yinzeng 刘印增 Liu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 June 2023 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HYHuawei Yang
Huawei Yang
YLYinzeng 刘印增 Liu
Yinzeng 刘印增 Liu
SWShaowei Wang
Shaowei Wang
HQHuixing Qu
Huixing Qu
NLNing Li
Ning Li
JQJianfeng Qiu
Jianfeng Qiu
This study proposes an improved algorithm based on the You Only Look Once v7 (YOLOv7) to address the low accuracy of apple fruit target recognition caused by high fruit density, occlusion, and overlapping issues. Firstly, we proposed a preprocessing algorithm for the split image with overlapping to improve the robotic intelligent picking recognition accuracy. Then, we divided the training, validation, and test sets. Secondly, the MobileOne module was introduced into the backbone network of YOLOv7 to achieve parametric fusion and reduce network computation. Afterward, we improved the SPPCSPS module and changed the serial channel to the parallel channel to enhance the speed of image feature fusion. We added an auxiliary detection head to the head structure. Finally, we conducted fruit target recognition based on model validation and tests. The results showed that the accuracy of the improved YOLOv7 algorithm increased by 6.9%. The recall rate increased by 10%, the mAP1 algorithm increased by 5%, and the mAP2 algorithm increased by 3.8%. The accuracy of the improved YOLOv7 algorithm was 3.5%, 14%, 9.1%, and 6.5% higher than that of other control YOLO algorithms, verifying that the improved YOLOv7 algorithm could significantly improve the fruit target recognition in high-density fruits.

5 July 2024 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYinzeng 刘印增 Liu
Yinzeng 刘印增 Liu
FZFandi Zeng
Fandi Zeng
HDHongwei Diao
Hongwei Diao
JZJunke Zhu
Junke Zhu
DJDong Ji
Dong Ji
ZZZhihuan Zhao
Zhihuan Zhao
Accurate weed detection is essential for the precise control of weeds in wheat fields, but weeds and wheat are sheltered from each other, and there is no clear size specification, making it difficult to accurately detect weeds in wheat. To achieve the precise identification of weeds, wheat weed datasets were constructed, and a wheat field weed detection model, YOLOv8-MBM, based on improved YOLOv8s, was proposed. In this study, a lightweight visual converter (MobileViTv3) was introduced into the C2f module to enhance the detection accuracy of the model by integrating input, local (CNN), and global (ViT) features. Secondly, a bidirectional feature pyramid network (BiFPN) was introduced to enhance the performance of multi-scale feature fusion. Furthermore, to address the weak generalization and slow convergence speed of the CIoU loss function for detection tasks, the bounding box regression loss function (MPDIOU) was used instead of the CIoU loss function to improve the convergence speed of the model and further enhance the detection performance. Finally, the model performance was tested on the wheat weed datasets. The experiments show that the YOLOv8-MBM proposed in this paper is superior to Fast R-CNN, YOLOv3, YOLOv4-tiny, YOLOv5s, YOLOv7, YOLOv9, and other mainstream models in regards to detection performance. The accuracy of the improved model reaches 92.7%. Compared with the original YOLOv8s model, the precision, recall, mAP1, and mAP2 are increased by 10.6%, 8.9%, 9.7%, and 9.3%, respectively. In summary, the YOLOv8-MBM model successfully meets the requirements for accurate weed detection in wheat fields.

29 June 2024 in Horticulturae
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DJDong Ji
Dong Ji
Limin LiuLimin Liu
Limin Liu
FZFandi Zeng
Fandi Zeng
GZGuangteng Zhang
Guangteng Zhang
YLYinzeng 刘印增 Liu
Yinzeng 刘印增 Liu
ZZZhihuan Zhao
Zhihuan Zhao
The most important part of fruit cultivation is transplanting, which can be completed efficiently by an automatic transplanter. In this study, an automatic solanum lycopersicum transplanter was developed. It is primarily composed of the following devices: a seedling tray fixator, a mechanical transplanting arm, double horizontal driving modules, double vertical driving cylinders, a seedling separation device, double-crank five-bar planting devices, a power distribution system, and a PLC control system. An experimental test on an automatic transplanter was carried out on dry land. The experimental results showed that when the planting frequency was 80 plants/(min·row), the transplanting success rate was 93.89%, the missed planting rate was 1.58%, the replanting rate was 0.65%, the lodging rate was 1.94%, and the exposed seedling rate was 1.94%. Each device of the automatic transplanter was coordinated to complete the transplanting process. The automatic transplanter met the operation requirements, and it not only transplanted in dry land but also provided a theoretical basis for fruit cultivation in solar greenhouses in the future.

12 August 2024 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FZFandi Zeng
Fandi Zeng
HDHongwei Diao
Hongwei Diao
YLYinzeng 刘印增 Liu
Yinzeng 刘印增 Liu
DJDong Ji
Dong Ji
MDMeiling Dou
Meiling Dou
ZZZhihuan Zhao
Zhihuan Zhao
There is a significant difference between the simulation effect and the actual effect in the design process of maize straw-breaking equipment due to the lack of accurate simulation model parameters in the breaking and processing of maize straw. This article used a combination of physical experiments, virtual simulation, and machine learning to calibrate the simulation parameters of maize straw. A bimodal-distribution discrete element model of maize straw was established based on the intrinsic and contact parameters measured via physical experiments. The significance analysis of the simulation parameters was conducted via the Plackett–Burman experiment. The Poisson ratio, shear modulus, and normal stiffness of the maize straw significantly impacted the peak compression force of the maize straw and steel plate. The steepest-climb test was carried out for the significance parameter, and the relative error between the peak compression force in the simulation test and the peak compression force in the physical test was used as the evaluation index. It was found that the optimal range intervals for the Poisson ratio, shear modulus, and normal stiffness of the maize straw were 0.32–0.36, 1.24 × 108–1.72 × 108 Pa, and 5.9 × 106–6.7 × 106 N/m3, respectively. Using the experimental data of the central composite design as the dataset, a GA–BP neural network prediction model for the peak compression force of maize straw was established, analyzed, and evaluated. The GA–BP prediction model’s accuracy was verified via experiments. It was found that the ideal combination of parameters was a Poisson ratio of 0.357, a shear modulus of 1.511 × 108 Pa, and a normal stiffness of 6.285 × 106 N/m3 for the maize straw. The results provide a basis for analyzing the damage mechanism of maize straw during the grinding process.

16 May 2025 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HDHongwei Diao
Hongwei Diao
FZFandi Zeng
Fandi Zeng
YLYinzeng 刘印增 Liu
Yinzeng 刘印增 Liu
MDMeiling Dou
Meiling Dou
ZZZhicheng Zhang
Zhicheng Zhang
ZZZhihuan Zhao
Zhihuan Zhao
The yam bean lacks accurate simulation model parameters for mechanized sowing and harvesting. The absence of parameters for the simulation model can lead to low-level mechanized design of the yam bean, which greatly affects its utilization and causes a waste of resources. This paper combines physical and simulation tests to carry out discrete elemental parameter calibration of the yam bean. The data were predictively analyzed by machine learning algorithms. A determination of basic and contact parameters of the yam bean was conducted based on physical tests. A discrete elemental model of the yam bean was developed, and angle of repose discrete elemental simulation tests were performed. The selection of simulation parameters and the identification of the optimal value range for simulation parameters were carried out by the Plackett–Burman test and the steepest climb test. Central Composite Design tests were conducted, and the results were used as a dataset for machine learning regression modeling. Then, the performances of three machine learning regression models were compared—back propagation (BP), genetic algorithm back propagation (GA-BP), and particle swarm optimization back propagation (PSO-BP). The coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MSE), and mean square error (MAE) of BP were 0.9004, 0.5204, and 0.3554, respectively. The R2, MSE, and MAE of GA-BP were 0.9611, 0.2112, and 0.2809, respectively. The R2, MSE, and MAE of PSO-BP were 0.9485, 0.2166, and 0.2883, respectively. It was determined that the GA-BP prediction model performed better overall. To ultimately determine the ideal set of simulation parameters, the GA-BP prediction model was examined and assessed. The GA-BP prediction model’s accuracy was validated by testing, revealing an inaccuracy of 1.22% between the rest angles measured in the simulation and the physical test. The results obtained from this research can act as a theoretical premise for further exploring the sowing and harvesting mechanisms of the yam bean.