This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.

Dr. Anne Velenturf
Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Basic Info


Research Keywords & Expertise

0 Business Model Innovation
0 Governance
0 Sustainability
0 circular economy
0 Network Analysis

Fingerprints

circular economy
Sustainability
Governance

Honors and Awards

The user has no records in this section


Career Timeline

The user has no records in this section.


Short Biography

The user biography is not available.
Following
Followers
Co Authors
The list of users this user is following is empty.
Following: 0 users

Feed

Preview
Published: 01 March 2021 in One Earth
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Global decarbonization relies on technologies such as solar and wind energy that require "critical" materials. In this issue of One Earth, Babbitt et al. propose circular economy interventions that preserve critical materials. Here we discuss how the lack of research and industry and policy readiness are challenging the adoption of such practices.

ACS Style

Anne P.M. Velenturf; Phil Purnell; Paul D. Jensen. Reducing material criticality through circular business models: Challenges in renewable energy. One Earth 2021, 4, 350 -352.

AMA Style

Anne P.M. Velenturf, Phil Purnell, Paul D. Jensen. Reducing material criticality through circular business models: Challenges in renewable energy. One Earth. 2021; 4 (3):350-352.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anne P.M. Velenturf; Phil Purnell; Paul D. Jensen. 2021. "Reducing material criticality through circular business models: Challenges in renewable energy." One Earth 4, no. 3: 350-352.

Short review
Published: 16 February 2021 in Sustainable Production and Consumption
Reads 0
Downloads 0

The pressure that the human species exerts on the natural environment through the extraction of materials and generation of wastes is widely recognised. Circular economy has emerged as a potential solution to make better use of resources. Positioned as a technology-focused concept that can generate economic gains while alleviating pressure on the environment, circular economy enjoys a positive reception by organisations in public, private and civic sectors and, increasingly, academia alike. However, concerns have been raised regarding some purported circular economy practices being promoted as ‘sustainable’ yet resulting in detrimental impacts on environment and society. We briefly revisit the systems ecology literature that construed the context for both circular economy and sustainable development. Values and principles in core sustainable development literature are analysed to offer a foundation against which circular economy can be discussed. We then analyse and critically reflect upon the strengths, shortcomings and theoretical flaws within the values and principles that emerged from the evolving circular economy literature. We propose a value framework and set of ten principles for the design, implementation and evaluation of a sustainable circular economy. We finish with a call for action for both practitioners and a research agenda for academia.

ACS Style

Anne P.M. Velenturf; Phil Purnell. Principles for a sustainable circular economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2021, 27, 1437 -1457.

AMA Style

Anne P.M. Velenturf, Phil Purnell. Principles for a sustainable circular economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2021; 27 ():1437-1457.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anne P.M. Velenturf; Phil Purnell. 2021. "Principles for a sustainable circular economy." Sustainable Production and Consumption 27, no. : 1437-1457.

Short review
Published: 22 July 2020 in Sustainable Production and Consumption
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Development and deployment of low carbon infrastructure (LCI) is essential in a period of accelerated climate change. The deployment of LCI is, however, not taking place with any obvious long term or joined up thinking in respect of life-cycle material extraction, usage and recovery across technologies or otherwise. This proposition is demonstrated through empirical quantification of selected infrastructure and a review of decommissioning plans, as exemplified by offshore wind in the United Kingdom. There is wide acknowledgment that offshore wind and other LCI are dependent on the production and use of many composite and critical materials that can and regularly do inflict high impacts on the environment and society during extraction and manufacturing. To optimise resource use from a whole system perspective, it is thus essential that the components of LCI and the materials they share and are comprised of, are designed with a circular economy in mind. As such, LCI must be designed for durability, reuse and remanufacturing, rather than committing them to sub-optimal waste management and energy recovery pathways. Beyond a promise to remove installed components, end-of-life decommissioning plans do not however provide any insight into a given operators’ awareness of the nuances of their proposed material management methods or indeed current or future management capacities. Decommissioning plans for offshore wind are at best formulaic and at worst perfunctory and provide no value to the growing movement toward a circular economy. At this time, millions of tonnes of composites, precious and rare earth materials are being extracted, processed and deployed in infrastructure with nothing in place that suggests that these materials can be sustainably recovered, managed and returned to productive use at the potential scales required to meet accelerating LCI deployment. Academic and industry literature, or lack thereof, suggest that this statement is largely reflected throughout LCI deployment and not just within the deployment of offshore wind in the UK.

ACS Style

Paul D. Jensen; Philip Purnell; Anne P.M. Velenturf. Highlighting the need to embed circular economy in low carbon infrastructure decommissioning: The case of offshore wind. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2020, 24, 266 -280.

AMA Style

Paul D. Jensen, Philip Purnell, Anne P.M. Velenturf. Highlighting the need to embed circular economy in low carbon infrastructure decommissioning: The case of offshore wind. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2020; 24 ():266-280.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paul D. Jensen; Philip Purnell; Anne P.M. Velenturf. 2020. "Highlighting the need to embed circular economy in low carbon infrastructure decommissioning: The case of offshore wind." Sustainable Production and Consumption 24, no. : 266-280.

Short communication
Published: 08 July 2020 in Energy Policy
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Energy sector policies have focused historically on the planning, design and construction of energy infrastructures, while typically overlooking the processes required for the management of their end-of-life, and particularly their decommissioning. However, decommissioning of existing and future energy infrastructures is constrained by a plethora of technical, economic, social and environmental challenges that must be understood and addressed if such infrastructures are to make a net-positive contribution over their whole life. Here, we introduce the magnitude and variety of these challenges to raise awareness and stimulate debate on the development of reasonable policies for current and future decommissioning projects. Focusing on power plants, the paper provides the foundations for the interdisciplinary thinking required to deliver an integrated decommissioning policy that incorporates circular economy principles to maximise value throughout the lifecycle of energy infrastructures. We conclude by suggesting new research paths that will promote more sustainable management of energy infrastructures at the end of their life.

ACS Style

Diletta Colette Invernizzi; Giorgio Locatelli; Anne Velenturf; Peter Ed. Love; Phil Purnell; Naomi J. Brookes. Developing policies for the end-of-life of energy infrastructure: Coming to terms with the challenges of decommissioning. Energy Policy 2020, 144, 111677 .

AMA Style

Diletta Colette Invernizzi, Giorgio Locatelli, Anne Velenturf, Peter Ed. Love, Phil Purnell, Naomi J. Brookes. Developing policies for the end-of-life of energy infrastructure: Coming to terms with the challenges of decommissioning. Energy Policy. 2020; 144 ():111677.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Diletta Colette Invernizzi; Giorgio Locatelli; Anne Velenturf; Peter Ed. Love; Phil Purnell; Naomi J. Brookes. 2020. "Developing policies for the end-of-life of energy infrastructure: Coming to terms with the challenges of decommissioning." Energy Policy 144, no. : 111677.

Journal article
Published: 26 February 2020 in Energy Policy
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Existing energy infrastructure have a technical and/or economic lifecycle predetermined by the lifetime of certain components. In energy infrastructure, the residual lifetime of civil structure or other components with a longer life is usually wasted. Modular energy infrastructure can be reconfigurable decoupling the life of the infrastructure from their modules, and extending module and/or infrastructure lifecycle. Modularisation could become a cornerstone to enable circular economy (CE) and enhanced sustainability. Remarkably, despite the growing interest among policymakers, practitioners and academics in both CE and modularisation, there is a lack of knowledge about the link between CE and modularisation in energy infrastructure. Through a Systematic Literature Review, this paper derives the gap in knowledge regarding the link between CE and modularisation in energy infrastructure. This link is then investigated in other sectors identifying relevant implications such as reduction of construction waste and achievement of the closed-loop material cycle. Furthermore, the case of Yamal Liquefied Natural Gas project is used to compare and contrast two perspectives: “Traditional modularisation” and “Modular CE”. Lastly, the paper discusses existing policies, provides policy recommendations to foster “Modular CE” in energy infrastructure and suggests a research agenda.

ACS Style

Benito Mignacca; Giorgio Locatelli; Anne Velenturf. Modularisation as enabler of circular economy in energy infrastructure. Energy Policy 2020, 139, 111371 .

AMA Style

Benito Mignacca, Giorgio Locatelli, Anne Velenturf. Modularisation as enabler of circular economy in energy infrastructure. Energy Policy. 2020; 139 ():111371.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Benito Mignacca; Giorgio Locatelli; Anne Velenturf. 2020. "Modularisation as enabler of circular economy in energy infrastructure." Energy Policy 139, no. : 111371.

Communication
Published: 30 November 2019 in Administrative Sciences
Reads 0
Downloads 0

A broad range of organizations, from small and medium-sized enterprises to large multi-nationals, are interested in adopting circular economy practices. A circular economy can help companies make better use of materials by minimizing the input of natural resources, reducing waste, and optimizing the economic, social, technical and environmental costs and benefits of materials and products throughout their lifecycle. Despite the interest of companies in a circular economy, only 9% of material flows in the global economy are circular. There is formal guidance for those offering business support with the aim to expedite the transition to a circular economy. However, support measures narrowly confine the role of companies and the motivations of business managers to the economic realms, assuming that companies are solely driven by monetary factors. Conversely, pluralist economic views emphasize the broader role of companies in society: for example, in respect of the well-being of their staff and the communities in which they reside. Indeed, our practical experiences of business support have brought alternative motivations to explore a circular economy to the fore. We argue that business support should stem from a broader conception of the role of business in society. The diverse motivations and willingness of business managers to engage in a circular economy should be investigated further with results feeding into broader and more inclusive business support guidelines in the future to accelerate the transition towards a circular economy.

ACS Style

Anne P. M. Velenturf; Paul D. Jensen; Phil Purnell; Juliet Jopson; Norman Ebner. A Call to Integrate Economic, Social and Environmental Motives into Guidance for Business Support for the Transition to a Circular Economy. Administrative Sciences 2019, 9, 92 .

AMA Style

Anne P. M. Velenturf, Paul D. Jensen, Phil Purnell, Juliet Jopson, Norman Ebner. A Call to Integrate Economic, Social and Environmental Motives into Guidance for Business Support for the Transition to a Circular Economy. Administrative Sciences. 2019; 9 (4):92.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anne P. M. Velenturf; Paul D. Jensen; Phil Purnell; Juliet Jopson; Norman Ebner. 2019. "A Call to Integrate Economic, Social and Environmental Motives into Guidance for Business Support for the Transition to a Circular Economy." Administrative Sciences 9, no. 4: 92.

Discussion
Published: 27 June 2019 in Science of The Total Environment
Reads 0
Downloads 0

A circular economy offers solutions for global sustainability challenges through the transition from the linear take-make-use-dispose economy to a better organisation of resources. However, realising a circular economy has ran into various biophysical constraints. Circular economy implementation is shaped by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation's butterfly diagram that depicts ‘biological’ and ‘technical’ flows as separate cycles, subsequently interpreted as organic materials circulating in open loop systems via the environment and inorganic materials circulating in closed loop systems within society. Conversely, in our view, resource flows often contain tightly bound combinations of organic and inorganic materials either due to their natural composition or due to their technical design. Building on this observation, a new diagram is proposed that broadens the scope of the circular economy to cover extractive sectors and the return of materials from anthropogenic use to natural reserves, thereby reshaping the conceptual space within which solutions such as effective zero-waste-residue technologies, business models, and policies can be developed for the optimal management of integrated resources from a whole-system perspective. The diagram offers a realistic outlook on the biophysical limitations of circularity and endeavours to inspire discussion that supports the transition towards a sustainable circular economy.

ACS Style

Anne P.M. Velenturf; Sophie Alice Archer; Helena I. Gomes; Beate Christgen; Alfonso José Lag Brotons; Phil Purnell. Circular economy and the matter of integrated resources. Science of The Total Environment 2019, 689, 963 -969.

AMA Style

Anne P.M. Velenturf, Sophie Alice Archer, Helena I. Gomes, Beate Christgen, Alfonso José Lag Brotons, Phil Purnell. Circular economy and the matter of integrated resources. Science of The Total Environment. 2019; 689 ():963-969.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anne P.M. Velenturf; Sophie Alice Archer; Helena I. Gomes; Beate Christgen; Alfonso José Lag Brotons; Phil Purnell. 2019. "Circular economy and the matter of integrated resources." Science of The Total Environment 689, no. : 963-969.

Journal article
Published: 18 August 2018 in Science of The Total Environment
Reads 0
Downloads 0

People altered the biophysical environment upon which they depend through the overexploitation of resources and growing waste generation. Action is urgently needed to return the resource economy within planetary boundaries and safeguard human well-being, by realising an increasingly closed-loop system that maintains values of materials and products within a sustainable circular economy. Innovative technologies and business models must be developed and implemented, requiring convincing “business cases” for industry and government; why should they be interested in adopting circular, resource recovery practices? Despite multi-dimensional challenges facing people and their environment, and the ability of resource recovery to contribute to restoring environment, society and economy, arguments for circular practices are often overly focused on economic aspects. Economic growth is not a panacea and this article supports the preparation of better arguments by presenting expert insights on 37 themes to consider for a resource recovery business case. The most important themes cover 1) Economic, social, environmental and technical value of resources and 2) Regulatory change; focusing business cases on these is likely to deliver positive impacts regarding all identified themes. The article synthesises the old “growth will solve it-” with a new “multi-dimensional challenges and solutions” paradigm, suggesting that resource recovery should support multi-dimensional growth to partly redistribute economic benefits to social and environmental values through the preservation of technical, functional value of materials and products. Writing successful business cases for resource recovery requires inter-disciplinary collaboration, and sustained effort to complete and translate business cases into measurable impacts through changed practices outside academia.

ACS Style

Anne P.M. Velenturf; Juliet S. Jopson. Making the business case for resource recovery. Science of The Total Environment 2018, 648, 1031 -1041.

AMA Style

Anne P.M. Velenturf, Juliet S. Jopson. Making the business case for resource recovery. Science of The Total Environment. 2018; 648 ():1031-1041.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anne P.M. Velenturf; Juliet S. Jopson. 2018. "Making the business case for resource recovery." Science of The Total Environment 648, no. : 1031-1041.

Journal article
Published: 02 May 2018 in Sustainability
Reads 0
Downloads 0

The United Kingdom’s (UK) economy is overly reliant on unsustainable production and consumption practices that deplete finite resources at rates that will increase production costs, business risk, and economic instability; it also produces emissions and waste that cause climate change and environmental degradation, impacting on well-being in the UK and beyond. The Resource Recovery from Waste programme (RRfW) promotes a transition towards waste and resource management in a circular economy that restores the environment, creates societal benefits, and promotes clean growth by engaging relevant actors in academia, government, and industry to co-produce a shared vision and approach that will realise such a transition. Sharing the RRfW’s government engagement results, this article presents a positive outlook for changing the UK economy and society through waste and resource management practices that maximise the values of materials by circulating them in the economy for as long as possible. Key themes, regulatory instruments, a stable policy framework, and an approach for effective academic–government collaboration are proposed. Comparing the results to government plans in four UK nations shows great differences in progress towards realising a circular economy. The article concludes with recommendations to capitalise on opportunities for growth, innovation, and resilient infrastructure whilst contributing to quality jobs and welfare throughout the UK.

ACS Style

Anne Velenturf; Phil Purnell; Mike Tregent; John Ferguson; Alan Holmes. Co-Producing a Vision and Approach for the Transition towards a Circular Economy: Perspectives from Government Partners. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1401 .

AMA Style

Anne Velenturf, Phil Purnell, Mike Tregent, John Ferguson, Alan Holmes. Co-Producing a Vision and Approach for the Transition towards a Circular Economy: Perspectives from Government Partners. Sustainability. 2018; 10 (5):1401.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anne Velenturf; Phil Purnell; Mike Tregent; John Ferguson; Alan Holmes. 2018. "Co-Producing a Vision and Approach for the Transition towards a Circular Economy: Perspectives from Government Partners." Sustainability 10, no. 5: 1401.

Preprint
Published: 05 February 2018
Reads 0
Downloads 0

The UK economy is overly reliant on unsustainable production and consumption practices, depleting finite resources at rates that will increase production costs, business risk and economic instability. This over-consumption produces emissions and waste that cause climate change and environmental degradation, impacting on the wellbeing of people in the UK and beyond. The Resource Recovery from Waste programme (RRfW) promotes a transition towards waste and resource management in a circular economy that restores the environment, creates societal benefits and promotes clean growth by engaging relevant actors in the transition process. RRfW collaborates with academia, government, and industry to co-produce a shared vision and approach to realise such a transition. Reflecting insights from RRfW’s government engagement, this article presents a positive outlook for changing the UK economy and society. It envisions a long-term future for waste and resource management that maximises the value of materials by circulating them in the economy for as long as possible. Four themes and an approach are proposed, including recommendations for regulatory instruments and a stable policy framework. It recommends further collaborative research to capitalise on opportunities for economic growth, innovation and resilient infrastructure whilst contributing to quality jobs and welfare in all four UK nations.

ACS Style

Anne P. M. Velenturf; Phil Purnell; Mike Tregent; John Ferguson; Alan Holmes. Co-producing a Vision and Approach for the Transition towards a Circular Economy: Perspectives from Government Partners. 2018, 1 .

AMA Style

Anne P. M. Velenturf, Phil Purnell, Mike Tregent, John Ferguson, Alan Holmes. Co-producing a Vision and Approach for the Transition towards a Circular Economy: Perspectives from Government Partners. . 2018; ():1.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anne P. M. Velenturf; Phil Purnell; Mike Tregent; John Ferguson; Alan Holmes. 2018. "Co-producing a Vision and Approach for the Transition towards a Circular Economy: Perspectives from Government Partners." , no. : 1.

Article
Published: 08 September 2017 in Sustainability
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Current societal patterns of production and consumption drive a twin environmental crisis of resource scarcity and waste overload. Positioning waste and resource management in the context of ecosystem stewardship, this article relates increasing resource demand and waste production to the violation of planetary boundaries and human rights. We argue that a transition towards a circular economy (CE) that contributes to a resilient environment and human well-being is necessary to achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals. The transition requires scientific and technological progress, including the development of low-energy biogeochemical technologies for resource recovery, and multi-dimensional value assessment tools integrating environmental, social, and economic factors. While the urgency to adopt a CE is well-recognised, progress has been slow. Coordinated change is required from multiple actors across society. Academia can contribute through participatory action research. This article concludes with the participation strategy of the Resource Recovery from Waste programme, aiming for changes in mentality, industry practices, and policies and regulations in the waste and resource management landscape in the UK.

ACS Style

Anne P. M. Velenturf; Phil Purnell. Resource Recovery from Waste: Restoring the Balance between Resource Scarcity and Waste Overload. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1603 .

AMA Style

Anne P. M. Velenturf, Phil Purnell. Resource Recovery from Waste: Restoring the Balance between Resource Scarcity and Waste Overload. Sustainability. 2017; 9 (9):1603.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anne P. M. Velenturf; Phil Purnell. 2017. "Resource Recovery from Waste: Restoring the Balance between Resource Scarcity and Waste Overload." Sustainability 9, no. 9: 1603.

Journal article
Published: 03 August 2017 in Microbial Biotechnology
Reads 0
Downloads 0

As we transition from fossil fuel reliance to a new energy future, innovative microbial biotechnologies may offer new routes to maximize recovery from conventional and unconventional energy assets; as well as contributing to reduced emission pathways and new technologies for carbon capture and utilization. Here we discuss the role of microbiology in petroleum biotechnologies in relation to addressing UN Sustainable Development Goal 12 (ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns), with a focus on microbially-mediated energy recovery from unconventionals (heavy oil to methane), shale gas and fracking, bioelectrochemical systems for the production of electricity from fossil fuel resources, and innovations in synthetic biology. Furthermore, using wastes to support a more sustainable approach to fossil fuel extraction processes is considered as we undertake the move towards a more circular global economy.

ACS Style

Angela Sherry; Luiza Andrade; Anne Velenturf; Beate Christgen; Neil D. Gray; Ian M. Head. How to access and exploit natural resources sustainably: petroleum biotechnology. Microbial Biotechnology 2017, 10, 1206 -1211.

AMA Style

Angela Sherry, Luiza Andrade, Anne Velenturf, Beate Christgen, Neil D. Gray, Ian M. Head. How to access and exploit natural resources sustainably: petroleum biotechnology. Microbial Biotechnology. 2017; 10 (5):1206-1211.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Angela Sherry; Luiza Andrade; Anne Velenturf; Beate Christgen; Neil D. Gray; Ian M. Head. 2017. "How to access and exploit natural resources sustainably: petroleum biotechnology." Microbial Biotechnology 10, no. 5: 1206-1211.

Journal article
Published: 01 January 2017 in Regional Studies, Regional Science
Reads 0
Downloads 0
ACS Style

Anne P. M. Velenturf. Initiating resource partnerships for industrial symbiosis. Regional Studies, Regional Science 2017, 4, 117 -124.

AMA Style

Anne P. M. Velenturf. Initiating resource partnerships for industrial symbiosis. Regional Studies, Regional Science. 2017; 4 (1):117-124.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anne P. M. Velenturf. 2017. "Initiating resource partnerships for industrial symbiosis." Regional Studies, Regional Science 4, no. 1: 117-124.

Journal article
Published: 01 August 2016 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Reads 0
Downloads 0
ACS Style

Anne Velenturf. Promoting industrial symbiosis: empirical observations of low-carbon innovations in the Humber region, UK. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016, 128, 116 -130.

AMA Style

Anne Velenturf. Promoting industrial symbiosis: empirical observations of low-carbon innovations in the Humber region, UK. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016; 128 ():116-130.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anne Velenturf. 2016. "Promoting industrial symbiosis: empirical observations of low-carbon innovations in the Humber region, UK." Journal of Cleaner Production 128, no. : 116-130.

Journal article
Published: 29 July 2016 in People, Place and Policy Online
Reads 0
Downloads 0
ACS Style

Anne Velenturf. Analysing the governance system for the promotion of industrial symbiosis in the Humber region, UK. People, Place and Policy Online 2016, 10, 146 -173.

AMA Style

Anne Velenturf. Analysing the governance system for the promotion of industrial symbiosis in the Humber region, UK. People, Place and Policy Online. 2016; 10 (2):146-173.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anne Velenturf. 2016. "Analysing the governance system for the promotion of industrial symbiosis in the Humber region, UK." People, Place and Policy Online 10, no. 2: 146-173.

Journal article
Published: 07 July 2015 in Journal of Industrial Ecology
Reads 0
Downloads 0

SummaryIndustrial symbiosis (IS) has been identified as a strategy for promoting industrial sustainability. IS has been defined as the development of close working agreements between industrial and other organizations that, through the innovative reuse, recycling, or sharing of resources, leads to resource efficiency. Key to IS are innovation and social network development. This article critically reviews IS literature and concludes that, to inform proactive strategies for promoting IS, the understanding of the social processes leading to resource innovation needs to be improved. Industrial ecologists generally believe that close geographical proximity and trust are essential to the development of IS. This article argues, however, that there is a need to learn more about the meaning of, need for, and specific role of geographical proximity and trust in IS and, additionally, that other potentially important social factors have remained underexplored. To move IS research forward, this article suggests to engage with research in economic geography on the concept of ‘proximity,’ which draws attention to the ways in which geographical, cognitive, institutional, social, and organizational distances between actors might affect innovation. Arguably, the analytically distinct, but flexible, dimensions of proximity can be useful to explore how and why IS develops. The resulting qualitative knowledge would form a basis for researching whether general patterns for IS development exist and, more important, could inform public and private strategies that indicate which actions could be taken, as well as when and in what way to promote resource synergies and sustainable industrial development.

ACS Style

Anne Velenturf; Paul D. Jensen. Promoting Industrial Symbiosis: Using the Concept of Proximity to Explore Social Network Development. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2015, 20, 700 -709.

AMA Style

Anne Velenturf, Paul D. Jensen. Promoting Industrial Symbiosis: Using the Concept of Proximity to Explore Social Network Development. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2015; 20 (4):700-709.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anne Velenturf; Paul D. Jensen. 2015. "Promoting Industrial Symbiosis: Using the Concept of Proximity to Explore Social Network Development." Journal of Industrial Ecology 20, no. 4: 700-709.