Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a progressive liver disease characterized by chronic inflammation leading to liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Even though the exact pathogenesis is still unclear, a combination of autoimmune, environmental, and ischemic factors could explain certain aspects of the disease. The most important diagnostic step is cholangiography, which can be obtained either by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRCP as the gold standard), or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. It shows multifocal short biliary duct strictures leading to the “beaded” aspect. Cholangiocarcinoma and colorectal adenocarcinoma are the most feared complications in patients with Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Continuous screening consists of annual clinical, biochemical, and ultrasound assessments in asymptomatic patients and annual colonoscopy in patients with PSC and inflammatory bowel disease. In newly diagnosed patients with PSC, colonoscopy is mandatory and, if negative, then, a repeat colonoscopy should be performed in 3–5 years. The lack of efficient curative medical treatment makes invasive treatments such as liver transplant and endoscopy the mainstream for managing PSC and its complications. Until now, even though only ursodeoxycholic acid has shown a moderate clinical, biochemical, and even histological improvement, it has no significant influence on the risk of cholangiocarcinoma, liver transplant need, or death risk and it is no longer recommended in treating early PSC. Further studies are in progress to establish the effect of molecular-targeted therapies in PSC.

Pancreatic cysts are becoming a popular diagnostic tool due to the increased availability of high-quality cross-sectional imaging. Pancreatic cystic lesions constitute closed, liquid-containing cavities, which are either neoplastic or non-neoplastic. While serous lesions often follow a benign course, mucinous lesions can hide carcinoma and, therefore, require different management. Moreover, all cysts should be considered mucinous until proven otherwise, thus limiting the errors in managing these entities. Due to the need for high contrast soft tissue imaging, magnetic resonance imaging represents an elective, non-invasive diagnostic tool. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has started gaining more prominence with regard to the proper diagnosis and management of pancreatic cysts, offering quality information with minimal risks. Enabling both the acquisition of endoscopic images of the papilla and the endosonographic high-quality evaluation of septae, mural nodules along with the vascular patterns of the lesion contribute to a definitive diagnosis. Moreover, the possibility of obtaining cytological or histological samples could become mandatory in the foreseeable future, allowing for more precise molecular testing. Future research should focus on detecting methods to quickly diagnose high-grade dysplasia or early cancer for patients with pancreatic cysts, thus allowing time for appropriate treatment and avoiding surgical overtreatment or over surveillance in selected cases.

Background and aims. Clinically significant delayed bleeding (CSDB) may complicate endoscopic colorectal submucosal dissection (ESD). We aimed to assess the efficacy of preventive measures for CSDB. Methods. We assessed the results of a prospective registry of colorectal ESD for laterally spreading lesions. We evaluated the effect of clip closure and PuraStat application on the prevention of CSDB. Results. A total of 40 patients with 41 colorectal ESDs were included. ESD was successful in 38 lesions (92.7%), 35 with R0 resection (92.1%) and 33 with curative resection (86.8%). CSDB occurred in 3 of 38 lesions (7.9%, 95% CI [1.7–21.4%]), exclusively after rectal ESD (3 of 22 rectal lesions vs. 0 of 16 colonic lesions, p = 0.249). Clip closure was more frequently used after colonic ESD (12 of 16 colonic lesions vs. 2 of 22 rectal lesions, p < 0.001) and was not protective for CSDB in the univariate analysis, even though no events occurred after clip closure (0 of 14 lesions with clip closure vs. 3 of 24 lesions without, p = 0.283). PuraStat was more frequently applied after ESD for rectal lesions (16 of 22 rectal lesions vs. 2 of 16 colonic lesions, p < 0.001) and was not protective for CSDB, with all three events occurring after PuraStat application (3 of 18 lesions with PuraStat application vs. 0 of 20 lesions without, p = 0.097). Conclusions. CSDB occurred exclusively after rectal ESD, and no predictive factors were identified in the univariate analysis. Clip closure and PuraStat application were not protective for CSDB.

Background/Objectives: Acute-on-chronic pancreatitis (ACP) is a fibro-inflammatory syndrome that stands at the border between acute pancreatitis (AP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP). It can be broadly defined as an acute exacerbation of CP. Large language models (LLMs) are artificial intelligence (AI) machine learning tools that can be employed in clinical decision systems (CDSs). Methods: This is an exploratory benchmark study. Six LLM chatbots were evaluated on a Likert scale by a panel of 13 experts in pancreatology based on the similarity of responses to a position statement (PS) in ACP. Results: ClaudeAI had the best average Likert score, while Alice had the lowest. There was a positive correlation between the length of the response and expert-perceived similarity. There was no correlation between seniority and Likert score. Conclusions: In this exploratory benchmark, some LLMs generated answers that were often judged as similar to the position statement, suggesting that they might be helpful as educational support tools and may assist in the refinement of research questions or in the identification of research gaps in this particular pathology.

Background and aims. Clinically significant delayed bleeding (CSDB) may complicate endoscopic colorectal submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods. We assessed the results of a prospective registry of colorectal ESD. We evaluated the effect of clip closure and PuraStat application for prevention of CSDB. Results. 40 patients with 41 colorectal ESD were included. ESD was successful in 38 lesions (92.7%), 35 with R0 resection (92.1%) and 33 with curative resection (86.8%). CSDB occurred in 3 out 38 lesions (7.9%, 95% CI [1.7 – 21.4%]), exclusively after rectal ESD (3 of 22 rectal lesions vs. 0 of 16 colonic lesions, p = 0.249). Clip closure was more frequently used after colonic ESD (12 of 16 colonic lesions vs. 2 of 22 rectal lesions, p < 0.001) and was not protective for CSDB in univariate analysis, even though no events occurred after clip closure (0 of 14 lesions with clip closure vs. 3 of 27 lesions without, p = 0.283). PuraStat was more frequently applied after ESD for rectal lesions (16 of 22 rectal lesions vs. 2 of 16 colonic le-sions, p < 0.001) and was not protective for CSDB, all three events occurring after PuraStat application (3 of 21 lesions with PuraStat application vs. 0 of 20 lesions without, p = 0.097). Conclusions. CSDB occurred exclusively after rectal ESD, and no predictive factors were identified in uni-variate analysis. Clip closure and PuraStat application were not protective for CSDB.