Objective: The surgical management of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) represents an unclear option compared to medical therapy, and it is necessary to deepen the role of minimally invasive surgery, represented by laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) and transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy (THL), for the treatment of PCOS in infertile women resistant to drug therapy and to establish its success in terms of ovulation and pregnancy rates. Methods: A search was performed in the main electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library) from 1994 to October 2022 in order to evaluate the role of surgery in patients with PCOS resistant to pharmacological treatment. Only original scientific articles in English were included. Results: Seventeen studies were analyzed in this review. In all analyzed studies, more than 50% of the population underwent spontaneous ovulation after surgical treatment without great differences between the two surgical techniques (LOD and THL). More than 40% of patients delivered, with a higher rate after LOD, although eight ectopic pregnancies and sixty-three miscarriages were reported. A lower risk of adhesion formation after THL has been reported. No clear data regarding the effect of surgery on the regularization of the menstrual cycle has been described. A reduction in LH and AMH serum levels as well as the LH/FSH ratio compared to preoperative levels for both surgical techniques has been described. Conclusions: Despite the scarcity and heterogeneity of data, surgical therapy could be considered an effective and safe approach in the management of PCOS patients with resistance to pharmacological treatment who desire to become pregnant.

Lymphadenectomy for vulvar carcinoma is characterized by many complications. Studies have demonstrated the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as a valid alternative to lymphadenectomy in the early stages of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and accuracy, as well as the oncological outcomes of SLNB following scar injection; in addition, to assess the role of a repeat sentinel node procedure in patients with local vulvar recurrence after primary treatment. Materials and Methods: A systematic computerized search of the literature was performed in the main electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Pub Med, and Cochrane Library) from 2010 to August 2024. Only scientific publications in English were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed. Results: Five articles were included in the study: four retrospective and one prospective observational studies. All patients’ characteristics, including type of surgery, postoperative morbidities, adjuvant therapy, and recurrence, as well as SLN detection and oncological outcomes, have been reported. Four studies compared the scar-injection group (cases) with the tumor-injection group (controls); only one study described the SLNB after vulvar recurrence (second procedure), comparing it with SLNB during primary vulvar surgery (first procedure). Conclusions: SLNB is a feasible and safe option in patients who have had previous excision of the vulvar tumor and in patients with a recurrence of VSCC who are not able or willing to undergo lymphadenectomy. Moreover, it accurately reflects the nodal status in these patients.

Background: Since February 2020, the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Italy has induced the government to call for lockdown of any activity apart from primary needs, and changing the lives of each of us. All that has dramatically impacted the management of patients affected by cancer. Patients with vulvar cancer (VC) represent a particularly frail population because they are elderly and affected by multiple comorbidities. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical impact of the SARS-CoV-2 infection on VC patients in terms of delay or impossibility of carrying out the scheduled treatment. Methods: The medical records of patients affected by vulvar tumors, referred to “DAI Materno-Infantile” of AOU Federico II of Naples between February 2020 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The presence of a positive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in nasopharyngeal swab defined the positivity to SARS-CoV-2. Results: Twenty-four patients with VC were analyzed and scheduled for treatment. The median age was 70.7 years (range: 59–80). Seven (29.2%) patients were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection: In three (42.8%) patients, the treatment was delayed with no apparent consequences, in four (57.2%), the treatment was delayed or changed due to cancer progression and, of these four, one died due to respiratory complications of COVID-19, and one died due to oncologic disease progression. Conclusion: COVID-19 caused, in most cases, significant delays in oncologic treatments and high mortality in our series of patients affected by VC.

Background: Intestinal-type vulvar adenocarcinoma (VAIt) is an exceptionally rare form of primary vulvar cancer, characterized by histological features resembling mucinous colonic carcinomas, including villo-glandular structures composed of goblet and Paneth cells with intracytoplasmic mucin. Objective: To provide a comprehensive synthesis of the existing literature on VAIt and to also report a case from our institution in order to define its clinical, pathological, and immunohistochemical characteristics and its management and prognosis. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of the literature according to PRISMA guidelines was performed through searching five electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS and Cochrane Library), considering studies from 1998 to May 2025. In our research, we included all peer-reviewed studies which reported cases of VAIt. Data about VAIt were extracted by included studies and compared. Results: All in all, 32 studies with a total of 40 cases (including our case) of VAIt were assessed. The median age at diagnosis was 58 years. Most tumors arose in the labia or perineal structures, often mimicking benign lesions. Immunohistochemistry consistently showed CK20 and CDX2 positivity, with variable CK7 and p16 expression. FIGO stage IA was the most frequent stage at diagnosis. Surgical excision was the mainstay of treatment, while adjuvant therapy was less commonly reported. Lymph node metastases were present in about 31.5% of cases. Despite aggressive histology, most patients were disease-free at follow-up. Mortality due to disease occurred in 10% of cases. Conclusions: VAIt is a very rare histotype of vulvar cancer. Compared to vulvar squamous cell carcinomas, approximately 40% of early-stage clinical diseases reported in the literature presented positive inguinal lymph nodes with recurrence even after many years. The optimal treatment is not well defined and should be based on the individual clinical history of the patient, as there are no established guidelines. Further studies and longer follow-up periods are needed to clarify the best therapeutic management and its long-term prognosis.