Background: Treatment of complicated infections in persons who inject drugs (PWID) and patients experiencing homelessness poses a unique challenge to clinicians. Long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotics, such as oritavancin, may facilitate extended courses of outpatient intravenous therapy while avoiding the need for central lines, improving compliance and thus increasing the chance of clinical cure. Methods: Retrospective chart review of adult PWID who received at least one dose of oritavancin for a gram-positive infection between 1/1/17 and 6/30/19 at a large safety net hospital. Results: Twenty three PWID received 24 courses of at least one dose of oritavancin for a gram-positive infection; 16 were experiencing homelessness at the time of diagnosis. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the most common infecting pathogen and bone or joint the most frequent infection site. Nineteen encounters resulted in clinical cure, including 5 whose conditions improved despite non-adherence to their prescribed regimen. Three patients experienced a non-favorable outcome. Two patients experienced mild adverse drug reactions that did not interfere with therapy; no patients died while on therapy. Conclusion: Oritavancin may be a clinically effective treatment option for the management of complicated gram-positive infections in PWID and patients experiencing homelessness. Further studies should be performed to validate these results.

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare but increasingly prevalent disease with high morbidity and mortality, requiring antimicrobials and at times surgical intervention. Through the decades of healthcare professionals’ experience with managing IE, certain dogmas and uncertainties have arisen around its pharmacotherapy. The introduction of new antimicrobials and novel combinations are exciting developments but also further complicate IE treatment choices. In this review, we provide and evaluate the relevant evidence focused around contemporary debates in IE treatment pharmacotherapy, including beta-lactam choice in MSSA IE, combination therapies (aminoglycosides, ceftaroline), the use of oral antimicrobials, the role of rifamycins, and long-acting lipoglycopeptides.

Conflicts of interest (COI) among clinical practice guideline (CPG) authors are common^1-3 and may affect clinician behavior, given the association that CPGs have with clinical decisions. The prevalence and nature of COI among authors of infectious diseases CPGs are poorly understood. We assessed the prevalence of COI associated with guideline-recommended drugs among Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) CPG authors and compliance with Council on Medical Specialty Societies (CMSS) and Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines.^4,5

Vancomycin is a glycopeptide antibiotic that requires close therapeutic monitoring. Prolonged exposure to elevated concentrations increases risk for serious adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity. However, subtherapeutic concentrations may lead to bacterial resistance and clinical failure or death. The most recent Infectious Diseases Society of America publication regarding therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin recommends using area under the curve (AUC)-based monitoring to maximize clinical success. Despite the guideline recommendation for AUC-guided dosing, many institutions still use trough-only monitoring in their practices, including those caring for patients with acute burn injuries. Following burn injury, patients are at a higher risk for infections, multiorgan failure, and pharmacokinetic alterations. The primary objective of this multicenter retrospective study is to determine optimal therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin by comparing clinical success between AUC and trough-based monitoring in patients with burns. MONITOR was a multicenter, retrospective study of patients with thermal or inhalation injury admitted to one of 13 burn centers from January 1, 2017 to August 31, 2022 who received vancomycin. Demographic and clinical course data, including acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence and clinical success, were obtained. Patients were evaluated for clinical success and grouped according to method of monitoring and adjusting doses: AUC vs trough-based monitoring. Clinical success was a composite definition and lack of meeting any 1 of 5 criteria: (1) persistent infection, (2) relapse, (3) antibiotic failure (clinical worsening), (4) AKI, and (5) death. A total of 517 vancomycin courses were assessed from 485 patients. There was no difference in the rate of clinical success between AUC monitored and the trough-only monitored groups. Incidence of AKI was higher in the trough-only group; however, it was not statistically significant after controlling for renal function on admission, past medical history of chronic kidney disease, and concomitant nephrotoxins.

: Strongyloides stercoralis is a parasitic roundworm that is present worldwide and can cause lifelong, often asymptomatic, infection. Immunosuppression, particularly by corticosteroids, is a risk factor for hyperinfection syndrome and disseminated strongyloidiasis—severe disease states that can lead to septic shock and death. Our institution implemented a strongyloidiasis screening and empiric ivermectin treatment protocol for inpatients receiving high-dose corticosteroids for severe COVID-19. Among 487 COVID-19 admissions treated with high-dose corticosteroids from June 10, 2020 to March 31, 2021, 61% of those with demographics at risk for Strongyloides exposure were screened for Strongyloides and treated empirically with ivermectin. Adherence to the protocol declined over time during the study period. The empiric ivermectin protocol appeared safe, but more research is needed to determine the effect on hyperinfection and/or disseminated strongyloidiasis risk and mortality rate, as well as to improve institutional adherence to the protocol.