Inflammatory bowel diseases are increasing among different ethnic groups. We aimed to compare the clinical characteristics, complications, and outcomes among Arab and Jewish people sharing the same healthcare system. All patients older than 18 years with a diagnosis of Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) between the years 2000 and 2021 were included. Data regarding demographics, disease characteristics, extraintestinal manifestation, treatment, comorbidities, and mortality were retrieved. A total of 1263 (9.8%) Arab CD patients were compared with 11,625 Jewish CD patients, and 1461 (11.8%) Arab UC patients were compared to 10,920 Jewish patients. Arab CD patients were younger at diagnosis, 36.11 ± 16.7 compared to 39.98 ± 19.4 years, p < 0.001, 59.5% males compared to 48.7%, p < 0.001; in addition, Arab CD patients had a higher rate of anal fissure, perianal abscess, erythema nodosum, diabetes mellitus, obesity, liver cirrhosis, and male infertility. Arab CD patients were less frequently treated with azathioprine or mercaptopurine compared with Jewish patients. No significant difference was found in the rate of anti-TNF treatment, but a higher rate of steroids treatment was found. The all-cause mortality of CD patients was lower among Arab patients (8.4% vs. 10.2%, p = 0.039). Significant differences were found regarding disease characteristics, course, comorbidities, and treatment among Arab and Jewish patients with IBD.

Background: Colonoscopy is an important and essential diagnostic and screening tool for colorectal cancer and other pathologies in the colon. High-quality bowel preparation (BP) is a key quality measure of colonoscopy and is critical for maximizing its effectiveness, including enhancing adenoma detection rates. However, inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) remains a frequent challenge and is influenced by multiple factors. This review aims to summarize and evaluate educational and technological interventions implemented before colonoscopy to improve BP quality. Methods: The methodology comprised a structured narrative review of studies published in English, including randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, observational cohorts, and meta-analyses. Interventions were categorized by their delivery mode and impact on BP adequacy. Interventions included written materials, internet-based education modules, short message service (SMS) reminders, visual aids, instructional videos, verbal communication, telephone support, smartphone applications, and virtual reality (VR) platforms. Results: Most studies reported significant improvements in BP quality with enhanced patient education, particularly with the use of instructional videos and smartphone applications. Verbal communication and telephone support also demonstrated positive outcomes but were limited by resource availability. VR represents a promising emerging technology, though its implementation remains costly and complex. Conclusions: Enhanced educational interventions are proven methods to optimize BP quality. The selection of an appropriate modality should consider patient characteristics, technological accessibility, and institutional resources. Personalized strategies targeting high-risk populations can further reduce IBP rates and improve overall colonoscopy outcomes.