Zhuang Liu

Dr. Zhuang Liu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 July 2023 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJun Luo
Jun Luo
XLXiao Luo
Xiao Luo
YGYonghai Gan
Yonghai Gan
XXXiaoming Xu
Xiaoming Xu
BXBin Xu
Bin Xu
CSCheng Sun
Cheng Sun
The binary metal organic framework (MOF) is composed of two heterometallic ions bonded to an organic ligand. Compared with monometallic MOFs, bimetallic MOFs have greatly improved in terms of structure, porosity, active site, adsorption, selectivity, and stability, which has attracted wide attention. At present, many effective strategies have been designed for the synthesis of bimetallic MOF-based nanomaterials with specific morphology, structure, and function. The results show that bimetallic MOF-based nanocomposites could achieve multiple synergistic effects, which will greatly improve their research in the fields of adsorption, catalysis, energy storage, sensing, and so on. In this review, the main preparation methods of bimetallic MOFs-based materials are summarized, with emphasis on their applications in adsorption, catalysis, and detection of target pollutants in water environments, and perspectives on the future development of bimetallic MOFs-based nanomaterials in the field of water are presented.

1 January 2025 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZLZhuang Liu
Zhuang Liu
Yonghai GanYonghai Gan
Yonghai Gan
JLJun Luo
Jun Luo
XLXiao Luo
Xiao Luo
CDChengcheng Ding
Chengcheng Ding
YCYibin Cui
Yibin Cui
Increasing numbers of emerging contaminants (ECs) detected in water environments require a detailed understanding of these chemicals’ fate, distribution, transport, and risk in aquatic ecosystems. Modeling is a useful approach for determining ECs’ characteristics and their behaviors in aquatic environments. This article proposes a systematic taxonomy of EC models and addresses gaps in the comprehensive analysis of EC models and their applications. The reviewed models include conventional water quality models, multimedia fugacity models, and machine learning (ML) models. Conventional water quality models have higher prediction accuracy and spatial resolution; nevertheless, they are limited in functionality and can only be used to predict contaminant concentrations in aquatic environments. Fugacity models are excellent at depicting how contaminants travel between different environmental media, but they cannot be used directly to analyze contaminant variations in different parts of the same environmental media because the fugacity model assumes that contaminant concentrations are constant within the same environmental compartment. Compared to other models, ML models can be applied to more scenarios, such as contaminant identification and risk assessments, rather than being confined to the prediction of contaminant concentrations. In recent years, with the rapid development of artificial intelligence, ML models have surpassed fugacity models and conventional water quality models, becoming one of the newest hotspots in the study of ECs. The primary challenge faced by ML models is that the model outcomes are difficult to interpret and understand, and this influences the practical value of an ML model to some extent.

12 September 2024 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZLZhuang Liu
Zhuang Liu
YCYibin Cui
Yibin Cui
CDChengcheng Ding
Chengcheng Ding
Yonghai GanYonghai Gan
Yonghai Gan
JLJun Luo
Jun Luo
YWYongguo Wang
Yongguo Wang
Accurate water quality prediction is the basis for good water environment management and sustainable use of water resources. As an important time series forecasting model, the Autoregressive Moving Average Model (ARMA) plays a crucial role in environmental management and sustainability research. This study addresses the factors that affect the ARMA model’s forecast accuracy and goodness of fit. The research results show that the sample size used for model parameters estimation is the main influencing factor for the goodness of fit of an ARMA model, and the prediction time is the main factor affecting the prediction error of the model. Constructing a stable and reliable ARMA model requires a certain number of samples for the estimation of model parameters. However, using an excessive number of samples will not further improve the ARMA model’s goodness of fit but rather increase the workload and difficulty of data collection. The ARMA model is not suitable for long-term forecasting because the prediction error of ARMA models increases with the increase of prediction time, and when the prediction time exceeds a certain limit, the fitted values of an ARMA model will almost no longer change with the time, which means the model has lost its significance of prediction. For time series with periodic components, introducing periodic adjustment factors into the ARMA model can reduce the prediction error. These findings enable environmental managers and researchers to apply the ARMA model more rationally, hence developing more precise pollution control and sustainable development plans.

3 August 2026 in Toxics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZLZhuang Liu
Zhuang Liu
Yonghai GanYonghai Gan
Yonghai Gan
CDChengcheng Ding
Chengcheng Ding
ZWZheng Wang
Zheng Wang
JYJiabao Yan
Jiabao Yan
YCYibin Cui
Yibin Cui
The rapid expansion of machine learning applications in heavy metal risk research has generated a large but fragmented body of literature, necessitating a systematic summary of various methodologies. This survey examines 182 research articles from Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore over the past 10 years, providing a comprehensive analysis of the application of prevalent machine learning algorithms across research areas related to heavy metal risks, covering more than 30 algorithms and 9 research areas. The results show that regional risk assessment, risk source analysis, risk driver analysis, and research on the pathogenicity of HMs are the four most frequently applied areas of machine learning, accounting for 80.06% of all applications. Classical machine learning, especially a series of tree-based algorithms, dominates across all applications, accounting for 69.93% and 42.74%, respectively. In addition, some auxiliary algorithms, particularly those for feature analysis, are often used in conjunction with machine learning, primarily to interpret model predictions and analyze risk sources or drivers. Three principal methodological challenges emerge from our review: (1) poor model generalizability across different environmental conditions; (2) insufficient reliability of predictions; and (3) difficulty in obtaining high-quality training data. Some current literature is also constrained by small sample sizes, regional bias, limited field validation, and insufficient integration of multi-omics data with machine learning pipelines. To address these gaps, we advocate for the routine adoption of explainable AI techniques with rigorous stability checks, the development of publicly available, field-validated benchmark datasets, and greater integration of mechanistic knowledge with data-driven models.

5 September 2026 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZLZhuang Liu
Zhuang Liu
ZWZheng Wang
Zheng Wang
CDChengcheng Ding
Chengcheng Ding
JLJun Luo
Jun Luo
XLXiao Luo
Xiao Luo
YCYibin Cui
Yibin Cui
Anomaly detection in water-related time-series data often reveals important environmental problems and serves as a starting point for scientific discoveries. Machine learning has become the mainstream method and a research hotspot for anomaly detection in recent years. This review examines 106 research articles from the Web of Science database published over the past 10 years. Unlike other surveys, this review focuses on anomalies arising from the water-related variables themselves rather than from equipment malfunctions. The work assesses the overall trends in the application and development of machine learning models for water-related anomaly detection. It classifies machine learning-based anomaly-detection models from two dimensions: development stage and anomaly-detection paradigm. Our analysis covers the mechanisms, strengths, limitations, and applications of various machine learning-based anomaly-detection models across different paradigms, highlighting current challenges and prospective research directions in water-related anomaly detection.