Despite the increasing interest in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), only a few cast aluminum alloys are available for this process. This study focuses on improving the LPBF processability of the A6061 alloy, which is challenging due to its wide solidification range, the dendritic columnar grain growth, and consequent solidification cracking. To address these issues, in situ-synthesized grain refiners can be used to induce equiaxial grain growth and prevent crack formation. A6061 RAM2 powder—a mixture of A6061, Ti, and B₄C—was characterized and processed using a low-power LPBF machine to create an in situ particle-reinforced metal matrix composite. Parameter optimization was performed to evaluate the effect of their variation on the printability of the alloy. Microstructural characterization of the samples revealed that the complete reaction and the synthesis of the ceramic reinforcement did not occur. However, TiAl₃ was synthesized during the process and promoted a partial grain refinement, leading to the formation of equiaxial grains and preventing the formation of solidification cracks. The tensile tests carried out on the optimized samples exhibit superior mechanical properties compared to those of A6061 processed through LPBF.

This paper focuses on optimizing the process parameters for manufacturing commercially pure titanium grade 2 using Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) technology. The most common approach involves trial-and-error builds with varying parameter combinations, followed by characterizing the bulk samples for defects and the microstructure. This method, typically based on Volumetric Energy Density (VED), is time-consuming and overlooks key powder properties. An alternative approach involves the use of efficient Volumetric Energy Density (VED_eff), which represents the energy density effectively available for the L-PBF process, considering both the process parameters and powder properties such as absorptivity and thermal diffusivity. In this study, VED_eff was applied and compared to a work window defined by thermodynamic data, with limits corresponding to the energy needed for titanium melting and evaporation. Forty-two tests were performed with different combinations of laser powers and scanning speeds; the samples were then characterized in terms of porosity, microstructure, and hardness. The findings showed no correlation between VED and the work window while VED_eff aligned with the work window, although the highest relative densities (>99%) and hardness values were achieved in a narrower range. Despite this, the VED_eff approach proved to be a useful starting point for optimizing the process parameters.